GREAT BRITAIN | VP | UMP | Flanders |
20
|
+3
|
Holland
|
20
|
+3
|
Hanover
|
10
|
+2
|
Sweden
|
10
|
+2
|
Portugal
|
10
|
+2
|
Denmark
|
5
|
+2
|
Sicily
|
5
|
+2
|
Egypt
|
5
|
+2
|
Malta
|
5
|
+2
|
Gibraltar
|
5
|
+2
|
Corfu
|
5
|
+1
|
Each lost home nation province
|
-30
|
+3
|
Flanders and/or Holland controlled by any other power
|
-30
|
(-3)
|
Sweden controlled by any other power
|
-20
|
(-2)
|
Egypt controlled by any other power
|
-10
|
(-1)
|
Gibraltar controlled by any other power
|
-10
|
(-1)
|
Malta controlled by any other power
|
-10
|
(-1)
|
Commentary: Britain entered the war against France with two objectives: to secure the Low Countries and to restore the European balance of power, because both these objectives were necessary for Britain’s military and economic security; otherwise, successive British governments were concerned to limit Britain’s involvement on the Continent as much as possible. Certain exceptions to this policy were acknowledged however: the claims on British resources of the king’s German principality of Hanover could not be ignored entirely in Whitehall’s calculations, no matter how much some British politicians might have wished to do so. Moreover, after the loss of the American colonies, the Baltic became Britain’s chief source of naval supplies, and as a result Britain became very sensitive to the extension of other powers’ influence in that region, treating successive Leagues of Armed Neutrality as virtual declarations of war. In southern Europe and the Mediterranean, Portugal was a traditional British ally and an important trade partner, Sicily, Gibraltar, Malta and Corfu were crucial bases for the maintenance of British naval power, and (particularly after Bonaparte’s expedition in 1798) Egypt’s importance for the defence of India was well understood in London.
PRUSSIA Control | VP | UMP | Hanover |
20
|
+3
|
Saxony
|
20
|
+3
|
Hesse
|
15
|
+2
|
North German Confederation (11.5)*
|
15
|
+1 eacha
|
Duchies
|
5
|
+1
|
Berg
|
5
|
+1
|
Kleves
|
5
|
+1
|
Mecklenburg
|
5
|
+1
|
Hither Pomerania
|
5
|
+1
|
Holland
|
5
|
+1
|
Each lost home nation province
|
-10
|
+2
|
Poland controlled by any other power
|
-15
|
(-2)
|
German Confederation controlled by any other power
|
-15/-25b
|
(-3)
|
a) +1 for each potential constituent of the Confederation except Hanover, Saxony and Hesse. The Confederation may not be ceded as a unit.
b) The higher victory point penalty is used if Prussia has ever activated its landwehr (see 12.11.3.1)
|
Commentary: Prussia in the 18th and early 19th cs. had two chief concerns, both of which were essentially defensive in nature. First, while the Partitions of Poland had significantly increased Prussia’s territory, it had also incorporated a large Polish minority within the kingdom’s borders; the Poles had drawn inspiration from the French Revolution, and had fought for their own independence as recently as 1796. A revived Polish state would inevitably make the Polish population within Prussia restive and difficult to govern, and therefore Prussia was opposed to any attempt to resurrect Polish statehood. More importantly, however, Prussia’s rulers since Frederick the Great were aware that Prussia’s future depended on the fate of the rest of Germany; Prussia was bound to oppose the hegemony of another Power over the lesser German states whether French or Austrian, and to work toward the supremacy of Prussia in Germany. More immediately, Prussia had ambitions for the annexation or domination of Hanover (which it briefly occupied in 1805-6), Saxony (half of which it gained finally at Vienna), and the Hessian landgraviates (which traditionally were Prussian client-states).
Share with your friends: |