A number of practical steps can be taken to facilitate an effective investigation into an allegation of a human rights violation against an indigenous person/people.240
When a complaint is made, it is important to collect all possible information that might help support the allegation. However, the collection of this information should not be done in a way that violates any cultural protocols of the relevant indigenous people.
3.1. Interview
The first step is to promptly interview the complainant, preferably in person, and with an interpreter if required. The next step is to test the information from the interview. It is important to consider if:
The testimony is consistent with other independent sources (e.g. indigenous peoples’ organizations or relevant NGOs)
The testimony corresponds with known policies and patterns of behaviour that impact indigenous peoples
Other testimonies and evidence corroborate the complainant’s statement
The testimony is understood by the NHRI officer in light of language and cultural differences.
Where possible, the Nigerian Human Rights Commission provides interpreters during the complaints process for indigenous peoples.241
| 3.2. Keeping records
Recording information for use is a necessary part of any investigation. All information gathered in relation to an allegation of a human rights violation against an indigenous person/people should be properly recorded in a file, including:
Testimonies
Statements or complaints
Relevant records
Photographs
Affidavits
Information and responses from authorities
Other relevant information (i.e. information supplied by indigenous peoples’ organizations).
In addition, relevant reports on human rights violations faced by indigenous peoples should be kept, including:
Data on the number of complaints received and resolved relating to indigenous peoples
Decisions in relevant court cases (i.e. domestic, in other jurisdictions and by intergovernmental bodies)
Reports prepared by NGOs and indigenous peoples’ organizations
Reports of international and regional bodies (i.e. by the Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, the Permanent Forum or the Expert Mechanism) and by other NHRIs
Media reports of indigenous peoples’ human rights violations.
This additional information can be used to help cross-check allegations and identify consistent patterns of human rights violations.
All information should by systemically collated in a formal recording format that allows others within the NHRI to analyse and use the information appropriately. Records with confidential information should be kept in a secure location and possibly be de-identified.
In recording and storing this information, NHRIs must be cognizant that indigenous peoples have suffered from a legacy of misappropriation of their identity, culture and decision-making powers. This appropriation has frequently been in the form of State records. Ownership and control of these records resides in the creator, in this case the State. However, these records might contain images of important forms of cultural expression and indigenous knowledges (i.e. dance or ceremony).242
This legacy has two main impacts on the ability of NHRIs to create an effective record from investigating a complaint made by an indigenous person/people. First, there may be a reluctance to provide information for the NHRI to record. Second, there may be a need to develop, in conjunction with indigenous peoples, a protocol for the recording and archiving of records pertaining to indigenous peoples. Principles from the Declaration can guide the development of such a protocol, including:
Self-determination
Participation in decision-making
Free, prior and informed consent
Rights to culture.243
If a protocol is developed and is subsequently promoted to indigenous communities, it is likely to reduce the reluctance to provide information for the NHRI to record.
4. Recommendations and remedies/redress
Depending on the mandate of the NHRI, it may be empowered to issue “findings” or recommendations following the investigation of a complaint of human rights violation. In some situations, NHRIs can call for the payment of compensation to victims. Some NHRIs have used this aspect of their mandate after investigating complaints of violations of economic, social and cultural rights, including matters specifically pertaining to indigenous peoples.
The National Human Rights Commission of India has a mandate to inquire into complaints of human rights violations, either in response to complaints or on its own motion (i.e. suo moto).
It also has the power to instruct the police and other law enforcement authorities to provide it with post-mortem video tapes and autopsy reports conducted by state medical officers in response to deaths in custody and other violations of rights occurring in custody.
The Commission’s investigative mandate is not confined to violations of civil and political rights; it can use its powers to inquire into violations of economic, social and cultural rights.
The Commission regularly uses its powers to recommend the payment of financial compensation to victims of human rights violations, following a determination by the Commission that the relevant government authorities have violated the rights of victims.
In one such case, the Commission recommended the payment of financial compensation to 125 tribal families from Orissa state, whose children had died due to the effects of malnutrition arising from the State’s denial of the right to food of the affected population. Reports indicate an almost universal rate of compliance by State authorities in response to the Commission’s recommendations for the payment of financial compensation to victims of violations.244
|
Key points: Chapter 9
Depending on their mandate, NHRIs can consider individual and collective complaints regarding violations of indigenous peoples’ human rights and make recommendations for redress and remedies to the appropriate authorities.
Some NHRIs have mandates that allow them to refer human rights complaints to the relevant authorities, including government agencies, the parliament, the judiciary and prosecuting authorities, and also to seek redress or remedies on behalf of complainants.
|
Share with your friends: |