Title I school-wide Plan for



Download 268.79 Kb.
Page1/4
Date19.10.2016
Size268.79 Kb.
#4343
  1   2   3   4
Title I School-wide Plan for
Written/Revised during the

School Year:


Revision Dates 05 /31, 07/12. 08/12, 09.12 / 10/12

Principal’s Signature






Title I School-wide Plan





Name of School Lindley Middle 7th/8th










NAME

POSITION/ROLE/PARENT

SIGNATURE

Bivens, Mike

Principal

 

Adams, Jeanolyn

Parent Facilitator

 

Baker, Thomas

ELA Contact & 8th Grade ELA Contact

 

Bounds, Damian

Assistant Principal




Brown, Kasisi

S.S. Coordinator




Bryant- Young, Necole

7th Grade Counselor

 

Dixon. Scott

Enrichment Contact




Dominick, Tiana

8th Grade Science Contact




Dupree, Terri

Math & Science Coach




Dye, Julia

Assistant Principal




Fulwood, Njeri

Student Support Specialist




Henry, Latoya

Enrichment Coordinator

 

Jones, Joy

7th Grade Science Contact

 

Jones, Marcella

8th Grade Math Contact




Leach, Amanda

8D Team Leader




Lewis, Terri

ESOL Contact

 

Morris, Ashley

Academic Literacy Coach

 

Price, Ronda

Fine Arts Contact

 

Richard, Glenn

7D Team Leader

 

Richardson ,Sabrina

Assistant Principal




Rikard, Bradley

Fine Arts Contact

 

Roberts, Dana

7B Team Leader

 

Roberts, Michelle

8A/Team Leader & S.S. Contact

 

Robinson, Terri

Parent




Shull, Angela

7C Team Leader & Science Co.




Tartaro, Marc

Physical Ed. Contact




Weisman, Jeri

Cafeteria Manager




Williams, Kerri-Ann

7th Grade Math Contact









Table of Contents

Pages

  1. Comprehensive Needs Assessment

  1. Participation of Individuals……………………………………………

  2. Instruments, Procedures, or Processes…………………………………

  3. The Needs of Homeless, Neglected, and Migrant Children……………

  4. Current Achievement Data……………………………………………..

  5. Information about All Students………………………………………...

  6. Data, Conclusions………………………………………………………

  7. Measurable Goals/Benchmarks………………………………………...

………………………………………………..



5-13

  1. Schoolwide Reform Strategies That Are Scientifically Researched

  1. Schoolwide Reform Strategies That Provide Opportunities For All Children………………………………………………………………..

  2. Effective Means of Raising Student Achievement…………………….

  3. Effective Instructional Methods That Increase Learning Time………...

  4. Address the Needs of All Children……………………………………..

12-16

  1. Instruction by Highly Qualified Professional Staff

  1. Strategies to Attract Highly Qualified Teachers……………………….

  2. School Status of Highly Qualified Teachers…………………………...

16

  1. Professional Development For Staff

  1. Include Teachers, Principals, Paraprofessionals, and Others…………

  2. Aligned Professional Development with the State’s Academic Content…………………………………………………………………

  3. Professional Development Activities that Address the Root Causes…..

  4. Include Teachers in Professional Development Activities Regarding the Use of Academic Assessments……………………………………..

  5. Schools Yearly Professional Development Schedule………………….

19

  1. Strategies to Increase Parental Involvement

  1. Involved Parents in the Planning of the Comprehensive School-wide Program………………………………………………………………...

  2. Parent Involvement Policy and Parent Compact………………………




22

  1. Plans for Assisting Preschool Children in the Transition From Early Childhood Programs and/or Students Entering Middle School or High School………………….




23

  1. Measures to Include Teachers in the Decisions Regarding the Use of Assessment……………………………………………………………………..

24

  1. Coordination and Integration of Federal, State, and Local Services and Programs

  1. List of State and Local Educational Agency Programs and Other Federal Programs that will be Included………………………………

  2. Description of How Resources from Title I and Other Sources will be Used……………………………………………………………………

  3. Plan Developed in Coordination with Other Programs………………..

25

  1. Activities to Ensure that Students who Experience Difficulty Mastering Standards shall be Provided with Effective , Timely Assistance

  1. Measures to Ensure that Students’ Difficulties are Identified on a Timely Basis……………………………………………………………

  2. Periodic Training for Teachers in the Identification of Difficulties……

  3. Teacher-Parent Conferences……………………………………………

26

  1. Description of how Individual Student Assessment Results will be Provided to Parents……………………………………………………………………….




26

  1. Provisions for the Collection and Disaggregation of data…………………….

27

  1. Provisions to Ensure the Disaggregated Assessment Results are Valid and Reliable…………………………………………………………………………

27

  1. Provisions for Public Reporting of Disaggregated Data………………………

27

  1. Plan Developed During a One-Year Period…………………………………...

28

  1. Plan Developed with the Involvement of the Community to be Served………

28

  1. Plan Available to the LEA, Parents, and the Public…………………………...

28

  1. Plan Translated………………………………………………………………...

29

  1. Plan is Subject to the School Improvement Provisions of Section 1116 ……...

30



  1. Comprehensive Needs Assessment of the entire school that addresses all academic areas and other factors that may affect achievement.



  1. Participation of Individuals

This is the charge, the vision, of Lindley 7th & 8th Grade Academy. We are excited for the upcoming and continued growth in the 4-core academic areas of math, science, social studies, language arts, and literature. All content areas will emphasize reading and writing components to enhance student learning. It is our hope that Lindley Middle School students will improve in their ability to self-assess and self-monitor their own progress by utilizing data. This will develop higher order thinking skills and independent learners. Decisions made from this data will improve the performance of individual students and the overall instruction program. The utilization of information by teachers, students, and administrators will move students to higher levels of performance on the Georgia Performance Standards aid in the development of lifelong learners. If we are to soar to new heights, teachers, administrators, and students, must know where our students stand academically. We must build relationships and successfully move students through levels of Blooms’ Taxonomy in order to increase the level of rigor required to master Georgia Performance Standards (GPS) and to be successful contributing members of society.


All Lindley students take classes from the state approved core-curriculum. The staff strives to assist all students in their area(s) of strength or weakness. Some students have a double dose of math and/or reading depending on their current performance level. We also offer advanced classes which include Spanish I, Accelerated Math 1, and Advanced Learning Program classes in all subject areas. Students are able to earn high school credit in the eighth grade for Spanish I and Accelerated Math I. The connections offerings are Chorus, Band, Orchestra, Music, Physical Education, Math Connections (Title I), Reading Connections (Title I), Health, Dance, Guitar, Keyboarding, Lindley Café’ Poetry, Helen Ruffin Reading Bowl and Art. This allows a wide variety of choice and ensures that all learning styles are met through these offerings.

Lindley students benefit from a variety of extracurricular activities including: After School Reading & Tutorial Program, Band, Chorus, Dance Ensemble, Drama Ensemble, Green Thumbs Gardening Club, Intramurals, Orchestra, Pre-College Readiness Enrichment Program (PREP), Step Team, Student Ambassadors, Student Government Association (SGA), the Leading Ladies of Lindley Mentorship Program, Male Mentor Program, Japanese Language Lessons, Science Club, Top Secret Writing Club and Yearbook Staff. At Lindley, we strive to find every child a place to grow outside of the classroom. School should help develop the well-rounded student. The selection of electives and extracurricular activities is based on student and teacher requests. The qualifications for participating in extracurricular programs vary based upon advisor mandates and/or standardized criteria. Students are informed of upcoming events via daily school-wide television broadcast, WLMS, which is produced by Lindley students.


This plan outlines the goals and steps to ensure students reach their highest academic level. This plan is a living document that will be monitored, evaluated, and adjusted as needed in order to maximize student accomplishment. Lindley teachers are involved in the practice of shared governance. The School Leadership Team is comprised of Subject Coordinators, Team Leaders, Administrators, District Support Staff, and the Parent Facilitator. The Leadership Team makes decisions that directly affect student achievement and school organization. The members of this team along with other stakeholders were instrumental in the development and revision of Lindley’s School-wide Plan. The development of the plan was carried forth by a committee of stakeholders that includes representatives from the leadership team, volunteer members of the staff, district support staff, parents and community members.

We have developed our school-wide plan with the participation of individuals who will carry out the comprehensive school-wide/school improvement program plan. Those persons involved were key staff members, as well as parents/community members. (See above list)….These individuals were involved by attending meetings in which the school’s leadership team met to discuss the year at a glance. During this time, former GAPSS data (2008), as well as the corresponding Title I and School Strategic Plans were revisited to discuss significant gains in student achievement and parental involvement, as well as critical areas of need. Climbing Mount Lindley to Reach the Summit-No Excuses. This is the charge, the vision, of Lindley 7th & 8th Grade Academy. We strive strategically, every day to reach those heights. We are excited for the continued growth in the 4-core academic areas of math, science, social studies, language arts/literature. It is our hope that Lindley Middle School students will improve in their ability to self-assess and self-monitor their own progress by utilizing data. This will develop higher order thinking skills and independent learners. Decisions made from this data will improve the performance of individual students and the overall instruction program. The utilization of information by teachers, students, and administrators will move students to higher levels of performance on the Georgia Performance Standards aid in the development of lifelong learners. If we are to reach the summit of Mount Lindley all teachers, administrators, parents and students, must know where our students stand academically. We must build relationships and successfully move students through levels of Blooms’ Taxonomy in order to increase the level of rigor required to master Georgia Performance Standards (GPS) and to be successful contributing members of society.

The GAPSS analysis conducted in March of 2008 revealed several challenges. The challenges with the highest priority were:

• A need to further unpack the state standards

• A need for standards based instruction in all classrooms

• A need for differentiation of instruction practices

• A need for additional higher order thinking questions and activities

• A lack of integration of 21st Century technology

• A need to further align curriculum, assessment, and instruction with state standards.

Significant Challenges


The GAPSS analysis conducted in March of 2008 revealed several challenges. The challenges with the highest priority were:

• A need to further unpack the state standards

• A need for standards based instruction in all classrooms

• A need for differentiation of instruction practices

• A need for higher order thinking questions and activities

• A lack of integration of 21st Century technology

• A need to further align curriculum, assessment, and instruction with state standards
Additional challenges include:

• High teacher turnover (result of RIF process)

• High student transiency rate

• Large number of students entering below grade level in reading and in math

• Large number of Special Education students with significant academic needs

• Large number of ESOL students with significant academic needs

• A small number of parents who participate fully but overall parental and community involvement presents a challenge as well

This Systematic Approach provides a more challenging, supportive, and rigorous academic program for all students.

The Systematic Approach emphasizes:

o Having high expectations for ALL Students

o Increasing academic rigor within all subject areas

o Determining the academic strengths and improvement needs of each student

o Connecting with each student and forming positive relationships within a more caring school environment

o High levels of teacher content collaboration-once a week for content (Tuesday)

o Weekly Staff Development- weekly on Mondays

o Weekly Leadership Meetings

o Weekly Team Meetings

o Weekly Data Team Meetings


Lindley Middle School made positive improvements during the 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and the 2011-2012 year. Specifically, over this span of time, our students’ score significantly escalated from a 68% passing rate to the most recent 90% passing rate on the Middle Grades Writing Assessment. Our students used their knowledge and skills in writing expository and persuasive essay to guarantee success.

Lindley Middle School utilizes a traditional schedule for the core-academic and connections areas (60 minutes). We attribute these significant improvements in student performance to the intense levels of common content teacher planning. All of our teachers meet weekly before/after and during school hours. They compose weekly lesson plans, as well as create common assessments, which are directly aligned to the CCGPS. According to Robert Marzano, effective schools promote a viable curriculum. A viable curriculum is one in which teachers clearly understand the standards for their designated, taught grade levels, as well as a grade level above and below. We are proud of our unique, pure middle school model that employs a certified teacher for each subject area on every team in the building.



The 2012-2013 grade level teams consist of the following configurations:
1) 7th grade – four 4-man teams, Literature/ Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies

2) 8th grade – four 4-man teams, Literature/Language Arts, Math, Science, Social Studies


We must make certain that our targeted interventions are implemented based on student learning needs and a full-time paraprofessional has been assigned to the class to assist with implementation. In addition to this initiative, the school has adopted the Inclusion Model, based on the students’ IEPs, which is used to strengthen and increase teaching effectiveness and student learning.
Each instructional subject has an interrelated special education and general education teacher. The special education teachers were placed in accordance with their certification. The teachers collaborate weekly to meet the needs of all subgroups. This is beneficial to all students in the inclusion class. We pride ourselves on the cooperative nature of the class. Every student is gaining skills from both professionals.

We at Lindley Middle School know that the success of our students depends on that of our teachers. With this goal in mind, all beginning teachers and teachers new to the school are assigned mentors. The mentors meet with their assigned teachers on a regular basis and perform classroom observations twice a quarter to monitor the success of their mentees. These mentors also work with new teachers on effective instruction through the Direct Instruction Program. Mentor teachers ultimately serve not only to guide our new teachers, but to support them as well.





  1. Instruments, Procedures, or Processes:

At Lindley Middle School, we follow a sequential, data-driven process to warrant our students’ instructional needs. We administer weekly, teacher-made common assessments, 12 (twelve) and 24 (twenty-four) week benchmark assessments, Checkpoints, and spring CRCT assessments. We carefully analyze and disaggregate our students’ data. We examine the full scope of our students’ performance; all students, as well as by delineated subgroups. Subsequently, we provide professional learning sessions for our staff to align their instructional practices with students’ instructional needs.




  1. The Needs of Homeless, Neglected, and Migrant Children:

We have taken into account the needs of homeless, neglected and migrant children by ensuring that upon enrollment, the counselors and social worker make an outreach to the families in need. According to the state we need to include the following statement for Cobb County students that reside in a Neglected and Delinquent Residential Facility:


“In cases where the student(s) reside in a Neglected and Delinquent Residential Facility, a representative from that Facility can serve as a proxy for the parent(s).”

  1. Current Achievement Data:

We have reflected current achievement data that will help the school understand the subjects and skills in which teaching and learning need to be improved. For example, we will focus on school –wide literacy across all content areas as well as connection classes. We will continue to work to close achievement gaps among subgroups as we embrace the Common Core Standards and explore ways to increase text complexity.


CRCT

Level

Reading

Language

Arts


Math

Science

Social Studies

Writing Assessment

Grade 7

90

89

84

80

75

---------

Grade 8

94

95

71

59

71

83% On Target

1% Exceeding Target





ITBS

Level

Reading

Language

Arts


Math

Science

Social Studies

Composite Score

Grade 7

40

35

35

37

46

40




  1. Information About All Students:

We have based our plan on information about all students in the school and identified students and groups of students who are not yet achieving to the State Academic content standards and to State student academic achievement standards including: economically disadvantage students, Black and Hispanic students, with disabilities as well as Limited English proficiency students.


READING

(% of Students Meeting/Exceeding Standards)



Grade Level


2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

Grade 6


76

81

85

---

---

---

---

Grade 7


67

73

83

86.7

88

89

90

Grade 8


84

78

83

91.6

95

97

94

Language Arts

(% of Students Meeting/Exceeding Standards)

Grade Level


2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

Grade 6


76

79

77

---

---

---

---

Grade 7


72

83

84

85.4

91

92

89

Grade 8


76

82

82

89.6

92

94

95

Math


(% of Students Meeting/Exceeding Standards)

Grade Level


2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

Grade 6


38**

48

54

---

---

---

---

Grade 7


68

51

63

72.3

76

83

84

Grade 8


63

68

29

59

57

63

71

Science


(% of Students Meeting/Exceeding Standards)

Grade Level


2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

Grade 6


36

35

42

---

---

---

---

Grade 7


33

49

54

64

71

76

80

Grade 8


55

52

25

49

39

47

59

Social Studies

(% of Students Meeting/Exceeding Standards)

Grade Level


2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

Grade 6


73

68
















Grade 7


78

74







68

67

75

Grade 8


83

73

37

49.3

70

68

71

Eighth Grade Writing

(% of Students Meeting/Exceeding Standards)



2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

2011-2012

Scale Score


355

200

201

203

207

212

212

% on Target


75

60

66

68

74

87

83

% Exceeding Target


8

1

2

1

1

3

1

Grade 8 ITBS COMPOSITE – 2010/2011 – 7th Grade ITBS COMPOSITES

Average Percentile Rank



Year

2002-2003

2003-2004

2004-2005

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2010-2011

2011-2012

Composite

38

37

33

36

32

27

34

38

40

Reading

36

32

29

35

28

25

32

33

35

Mathematics

40

37

34

36

34

26

31

34

35

Language

43

42

36

38

34

29

33

38

37

Science

38

36

34

37

32

31

38

41

46

Social Studies

37

35

31

36

37

31

35

38

40



  1. Data, Conclusions:

The data has helped us reach conclusions regarding achievement or other related data. In all subject areas our students met or exceeded the standards with at least an 70% or higher. The major strengths included the 91.67% pass rate of all students in Reading/Language Arts. Our teachers utilize Folio Writing to help prepare for the 8th Grade Writing Assessment. The compositions are submitted electronically and students receive specific feedback about how to improve their writing. Teachers place special emphasis on the domain of ideas, which accounts for 40% of the Writing Assessment.


The major needs that the data revealed showed our SWD and ELL subgroups are significantly lower than others in all core subjects on the CRCT. For example in Math the percent meeting and exceeding standards among our entire student body reflects 77.77%, while our black students are at 78.30 % and our white students are at 83.87% our ELL students are only at 63.70% and our SWD population are even lower with 46.40% meeting or exceeding the standards. This substantial decrease is evident across the board.



Download 268.79 Kb.

Share with your friends:
  1   2   3   4




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page