All H Analyzer
The “All H Analyzer” (AHA), as used in this plan, describes the integration of in-basin and out-of-basin effects on salmon and steelhead. The analysis explains contributions of harvest, hatcheries, hydropower138, and habitat data and strategies to recovery. The AHA process is an exercise that investigates (simulates) out-of-subbasin effects within the context of tributary habitat improvements.
AHA, as used in this planning exercise, simulates various recovery actions between in-basin and out-of-basin effects. This approach gives planners a means for evaluating various options. The different options include harvest regimes, modifications to existing hatchery programs, and habitat improvement actions. Listed below are preliminary results of the AHA analyses. These results provide only a relative assessment of the cumulative effects of actions among different sectors (Appendix J). SARs were held constant in all simulations.
Preliminary Results Wenatchee spring Chinook -
Preliminary results of AHA analysis suggest that the hatchery environment may have a large effect on the fitness of naturally produced Chinook.
-
A higher level of integration139 may be possible under the present condition scenario by reducing the number of hatchery produced Chinook on the spawning grounds through removal at collection points or selective harvest.
-
Scenario 3 habitat improvements may lead to a larger number of naturally produced returns. Additional returns of naturally produced fish may be realized if habitat improvements are coupled with removal of some hatchery produced Chinook.
-
Scenario 1 habitat improvements may not have a large effect on the integration rate unless the number of hatchery produced Chinook are further reduced on spawning grounds.
-
Preliminary results of AHA analysis suggest that the hatchery environment may have a large effect on the fitness of naturally produced steelhead.
-
A higher level of integration may be possible by reducing the number of hatchery produced steelhead on the spawning grounds through either removal at collection points or selective harvest.
-
Scenario 1 habitat improvements (and their effect on the number of naturally produced fish) will probably increase returns of naturally produced fish.
-
Scenario 3 habitat improvements may lead to a larger number of naturally produced returns. Additional returns could be realized if habitat improvements are combined with removal of some hatchery-produced steelhead.
Entiat spring Chinook
No AHA analysis was run on Entiat spring Chinook. This work will be conducted by the local watershed group and USFWS.
Entiat steelhead
No AHA analysis was run on Entiat steelhead. This work will be conducted by the local watershed group.
Methow spring Chinook -
Preliminary results of AHA analysis suggest that the hatchery environment may have a large effect on the fitness of naturally produced Chinook.
-
A higher level of integration may be possible by reducing the number of hatchery produced Chinook on the spawning grounds through either removal at collection points or selective harvest.
-
Scenario 3 habitat improvements may lead to a larger number of naturally produced returns. Additional returns could be realized if habitat improvements are combined with removal of some hatchery produced Chinook.
-
Scenario 1 habitat improvements will probably increase returns of naturally produced Chinook to spawning grounds.
Methow steelhead -
Preliminary results of AHA analysis suggest that the hatchery environment may have a large effect on the fitness of naturally produced steelhead.
-
A higher level of integration may be possible by reducing the number of hatchery produced steelhead on the spawning grounds through either removal at collection points or selective harvest.
-
Scenario 3 habitat improvements may lead to a larger number of naturally produced returns. Additional returns could be realized if habitat improvements are combined with removal of some hatchery-produced steelhead.
-
Scenario 1 habitat improvements may increase returns of naturally produced steelhead to spawning grounds.
Okanogan steelhead -
Poor productivity of the natural environment currently prevents many naturally produced steelhead from being present in the Okanogan subbasin.
-
Preliminary results of AHA analysis revealed that the hatchery environment may have a large effect on the fitness of naturally produced steelhead. Potential habitat improvements should increased survival for both naturally and hatchery produced returns and thus supports the transition to an integrated program.
-
Under present conditions, additional naturally produced steelhead are incorporated as broodstock, which improves integration rate. A higher level of integration may be possible by reducing the number of hatchery produced steelhead on the spawning grounds through either removal at collection points or selective harvest.
-
Scenario 3 habitat improvements may lead to a larger number of naturally produced returns. Additional returns could be realized if habitat improvements are combined with removal of some hatchery-produced steelhead.
-
Scenario 1 habitat improvements may allow for 100% use of naturally produced steelhead for hatchery broodstock and increase returns of naturally produced steelhead.
5.6.3Conclusion
Both approaches suggest that the recovery actions recommended in this plan should significantly improve the survival of naturally produced spring Chinook and steelhead in the Upper Columbia Basin. In addition, recommended actions within the habitat sector should improve the spatial structure and habitat quality within major spawning areas, allowing the populations to meet spatial structure requirements. Implementing actions recommended within the hatchery sector should remove the threats associated with diversity and likely lead to a diversity status that would meet the requirements of a VSP.
It is important to note that the integration analysis did not consider potential improvements in the estuary that may improve the survival of Upper Columbia populations. Actions that reduce toxics and predation in the estuary may translate into a relatively large survival benefit for Upper Columbia populations. These issues notwithstanding, it is highly probable that the combined actions within all sectors, including actions within the lower Columbia River and estuary, will move Upper Columbia populations to a more viable state. The monitoring and adaptive management program outlined in Section 8 will be used to demonstrate progress toward recovery of Upper Columbia ESU and DPS.
Table 5.9 Naturally produced Upper Columbia Steelhead run-size criteria and mortality take-limit for recreational harvest fisheries in the Wenatchee River, Methow River, and Okanogan Basin spawning areas. Catch-and-release mortality is assumed to be 5%. From NMFS (2003).
Tier
|
Priest Rapids count
|
Estimated escapement
to tributary area
|
Mortality impact (%)
|
Wenatchee River and Columbia River between Rock Island and Rocky Reach dams
|
|
<837
|
<599
|
0
|
Tier 1
|
838
|
600
|
2
|
Tier 2
|
2,146
|
1,700
|
4
|
Tier 3
|
3,098
|
2,500
|
6
|
Methow River and Columbia River upstream from Wells Dam
|
|
<908
|
<499
|
0
|
Tier 1
|
804
|
500
|
2
|
Tier 2
|
2,224
|
1,600
|
4
|
Tier 3
|
3,386
|
2,500
|
6
|
Okanogan Basin upstream of Highway 97 Bridge
|
|
<175
|
<119
|
0
|
Tier 1
|
176
|
120
|
5
|
Tier 2
|
180
|
120
|
7
|
Tier 3
|
795
|
600
|
10
|
Table 5.10 Artificial propagation programs in the Upper Columbia Basin in 2005 listed by release basin, primary hatchery facility association, program operators, and funding source
Program
|
Primary Facility
|
Operator(s)
|
Funding Source(s)
|
Wenatchee River Basin Releases
|
Chiwawa spring Chinook
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
White River spring Chinook
|
WDFW and private
|
WDFW
|
GPUD
|
Carson spring Chinook
|
Leavenworth NFH
|
USFWS
|
BOR
|
Wenatchee coho
|
USFWS facilities
|
YN/USFWS
|
BPA
|
Wenatchee sockeye
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
Wenatchee steelhead
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
Wenatchee summer Chinook
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
Entiat River Basin Releases
|
Carson spring Chinook
|
Entiat NFH
|
USFWS
|
BOR
|
Methow River Basin Releases
|
Chewuch spring Chinook
|
Methow Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
DPUD/CPUD/GPUD
|
Methow Composite spring Chinook
|
Methow Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
DPUD/CPUD/GPUD
|
Methow summer Chinook
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
Methow/Okanogan coho
|
USFWS facilities
|
YN/USFWS
|
BPA
|
Twisp spring Chinook
|
Methow Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
DPUD/CPUD/GPUD
|
Wells steelhead
|
Wells Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
DPUD
|
Methow Composite spring Chinook
|
Winthrop NFH
|
USFWS
|
BOR
|
Methow summer Chinook steelhead
|
Winthrop NFH
|
USFWS
|
BOR
|
Okanogan River Basin Releases
|
Colville Tribes Okanogan steelhead
|
Colville Tribes Hatchery
|
Colville Tribes
|
BPA
|
Carson spring Chinook
|
Leavenworth Complex
|
USFWS
|
BOR
|
Okanogan summer Chinook
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
Wells steelhead
|
Wells Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
DPUD
|
Columbia River Releases
|
Turtle Rock summer Chinook subyearlings
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
Turtle Rock summer Chinook yearlings
|
Eastbank Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
CPUD
|
Wells summer Chinook subyearlings
|
Wells Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
DPUD
|
Wells summer Chinook yearlings
|
Wells Hatchery
|
WDFW
|
DPUD
|
Table 5.11 Summary of artificial anadromous fish production in the Wenatchee subbasin
Fish Species
|
Facility
|
Funding Source
|
ESA Listed
|
Current production level goals
|
Spring Chinook
|
Eastbank Fish Hatchery Complex (Chiwawa acclimation pond)
(Operated by WDFW)
|
Chelan County PUD
|
Yes
|
672,000
(will decrease in future)
|
Leavenworth National Fish Hatchery (Operated by USFWS)
|
Bureau of Reclamation
|
No
|
1,625,000
|
Captive brood program in Manchester
(Operated by Aquaseed; may expand to facility in White River Basin)
|
Grant PUD
|
Yes
|
200,000
[This obligation may be partially met by other means in the future, current production much lower (< 50,000)]
|
TBD – Nason Cr. release
|
Grant PUD
|
Yes
|
up to 400,000
(future production)
|
Steelhead
|
Eastbank Fish Hatchery Complex
(Operated by WDFW)
|
Chelan PUD
|
Yes
|
400,000
(will decrease in future)
|
Summer Chinook
|
Eastbank Fish Hatchery Complex (Dryden acclimation pond)
(Operated by WDFW)
|
Chelan PUD
|
No
|
864,000
(will decrease in future)
|
Sockeye
|
Eastbank Hatchery
(Lake Wenatchee net pens; Operated by WDFW)
|
Chelan PUD
|
No
|
200,000
(will increase up to 280,000 in future)
|
Coho
|
Leavenworth NFH
(Operated by USFWS for YN)
|
BPA (Fish & Wildlife Program)
|
No
|
> 500,000
|
Acclimation sites at Nason Creek and Icicle Creek (YN)
|
BPA (Fish & Wildlife Program)
|
No
|
< 500,000
|
Table 5.12 Summary of artificial anadromous fish production in the Entiat subbasin
Fish Species
|
Facility
|
Funding Source
|
ESA Listed
|
Production level goals
|
Spring Chinook
|
Entiat NFH (Operated by USFWS)
|
Bureau of Reclamation
|
No
|
400,000
|
Table 5.13 Summary of artificial anadromous fish production in the Methow subbasin
Fish Species
|
Facility
|
Funding Source
|
ESA Listed
|
Production level goals
|
Spring Chinook
|
Methow Fish Hatchery
Acclimation sites at the Methow, Biddle, Twisp, and Chewuch Acclimation ponds
(Operated by WDFW)
|
Douglas PUD, Chelan PUD, and Grant PUD
|
Yes
|
550,000140
|
Winthrop NFH
(Operated by USFWS)
|
Bureau of Reclamation
|
Yes
|
600,000
|
Steelhead
|
Wells Dam Hatchery Complex
(Operated by WDFW)
|
Douglas County PUD and Grant County PUD
|
Yes
|
349,000141
|
Winthrop NFH
(Operated by USFWS)
|
Bureau of Reclamation
|
Yes
|
100,000
|
Summer Chinook
|
Wells Dam Hatchery Complex (Carlton acclimation pond)
(Operated by WDFW)
|
Chelan County PUD, Douglas County PUD
|
No
|
400,000142
|
Coho
|
Winthrop NFH
(Operated by USFWS for YN)
|
BPA (Fish & Wildlife Program)
|
No
|
250,000
|
Table 5.14 Broodstock collection guidelines of the Methow Basin spring Chinook supplementation plan (ESA Section 7 Draft Biological Opinion, Section 10 Permit 1196)
Wells Escapement Projection
|
Broodstock Collection Objective
|
<668
|
WDFW may collect 100% of Wells Dam escapement; place all fish into the adult-based supplementation program.
|
>668 but <964
|
Pass a minimum of 296 adults upstream of Wells Dam for natural spawning.
|
>964
|
Collection at levels to meet interim production level of
550,000 and 600,000 smolts at Methow Fish Hatchery and
Winthrop NFH, respectively.
| 964>668>119>175>499>908>599>837>
Share with your friends: |