Figure 7 Cross-relationship of the paths of nations (partial)
4. Conclusion and Future Study
The graphic design publications, reviewed in this research, represent important general conventions in graphic design history. These selections also allow us to reflect on their limitations, which are restrictive in both their publication language and distribution. They do not however, present a worldwide view of design history, especially not of domestic graphic design history. English is undoubtedly the dominant language of global communication, affecting and reflecting the viewpoints and perspectives of the largest territory in graphic design history. Consequently, using English as a vehicle of expression and communication, as well as the fact that the majority of research material is in English, can be seen as representing and reproducing cultural imperialistic behaviour, reflecting the power of the hegemony. This is represented by Western, liberal-minded academics writing about what is considered an "intellectual commodity" in their cultural context.17 We might even say that English is a major colonial-cultural language, and the historiographies of design research are based on the ideology of hegemony. The history we have been exposed to has pandered to the narrow perspectives, intentions and customs of its authors. Although it may be unrealistic to expect absolute truth in history, it is not unreasonable to look for an alternative angle, from which to configure our past, and provide hope for a broader audience in the future.
Graphic design offers new ways to explore the organisation of knowledge. The experimental scheme of timeline design demonstrates that graphic design has the latent capacity to be a way to strengthen and construct knowledge at different levels.This research endeavours to expand the references and interpretative frameworks surrounding design history by offering a critique of prevailing methods, and by understandings and reflecting on significant specialist writings. Indeed, certain preoccupations and limitations are present in any graphic design history perspective, so it is important that we appreciate the contributions made by the historians we have focused on. The canonized perspective of ‘Graphic Design History’ was questioned by Martha Scotford.18 Philip Meggs responded to Scotford by admitting that ‘the dangers of a canon should be acknowledged, however, there are risks in repudiating canonical figures whose philosophies or works had seminal or pivotal impact upon the evolution of graphic design. To repudiate seminal works, or for designers to avoid a canon - with the repudiation based on nationalistic, ethnic, political, or gender issues separate from the evolution of graphic design and its cultural role - is an equal danger’.19 Rick Poynor believes that a canon can provide a common body of knowledge, a shared basis for judgment and a starting point for discussion.20 It exposes us to essential material we might otherwise overlook, and helps set the agenda. It is one more approach in accessing and understanding graphic design history; one more step towards understanding our past and magnifying the potential of graphic design. Historical studies are valuable in that they bring forth an energetic and able direction which enables designers to find their place in a research environment, and to develop a creative calling. In this way, graphic design can make a difference in the world.
The history we have been exposed to has pandered to the narrow perspectives, intentions and customs of its authors. Although it may be unrealistic to expect absolute truth in history, it is not unreasonable to look for an alternative angle, from which to configure our past, and provide hope for a broader audience in the future.
Bibliography
Archer, Bruce, “A View of the Nature of the Design Research”, Design: Science: Method, R. Jacques, J. A. Powell, eds. Guilford, Surrey: IPC Business Press Ltd., 1981, pp. 30–47.
Aynsley, Jeremy, A century of graphic design, London, Mitchell Beazley, 2001
Barthes, Roland, Richard Howard trans, A lover's discourse : fragments, New York, Hill and Wang, 1978
Baudrillard, Jean, For a Critique of the political Economy of the Sign, St Louis, Telos Press, 1981
Bayazit, Nigan, “Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research”, Design Issues Vol 20 (1), Wint 2004, pp. 16-29
Bonsiepe, Gui, ‘A Step towards the reinvention of graphic design‘, Design Issues Vol.10(4), 1994, pp. 47-52,
Buckley, Cheryl, ‘Made in Patriarchy: Towards a Feminist Analysis of Women and Design,’ in V. Margolin, ed., Design Discourse History-Theory-Criticism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 251-264;
Clegg, Sue and Wendy Mayfield, “Gendered by Design: How Women's Place in Design Is Still Defined by Gender”, Design Issues, Vol.15 (3), 1999, pp. 3-16
Cross, Nigel, ‘Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science’, Design Issues, 17 no3, 2001, pp. 49-55
Dahl, Darren W.; Amitava Chattopadhyay and Gerald J. Gorn, ‘The importance of visualisation in concept design’ in Design Study, v. 22 no. 1, 2001, pp. 5-26
Derrida, Jacques, Writing and Difference, Alan Bass trans, Chicago U.P., 1978
Dilnot, Clive, “The science of Uncertainty: The potential Contribution of Design to Knowledge”, Doctor al Education in Design Conferenc 1998, Ohio, Proceedings of the Ohio Conference, 1998
——— “The State of Design History, Part I: Mapping the Field", in Dilnot, Clive. Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 213-232
——— “The State of Design History, Part II: Problems and Possibilities ", in Dilnot, Clive. Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989, pp. 250
Doordan, Dennis P., Design history: an anthology, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1995
Foucault, Michel, Power/Knowledge, Brighton, Hareveter, 1980
Forlizzi, Jodi and Cherie Lebbon, ‘From Formalism to Social Significance in Communication Design’, Design Issues, Vol. 18(4), Aut 2002, pp. 3-13.
Forty, Adrian, Objects of Desire: Design and Society 1750-1980, Thames and Hudson, London, 1989
Fry, Tony Design History Australia: a source text in methods and resources, Sydney, Hale & Iremonger and the Power Institute of Fine Arts, 1988
Garland, Ken, Mr. Beck's Underground Map, Harrow Weald, Capital Transport, 1994
Gowan, Al, ‘Philip B. Meggs: A Personal Note’, Print, 57 no1, 2003, pp. 26-7
Greeley, Robin A. ‘Richard Duardo's 'Aztlan' poster: Interrogating cultural hegemony in graphic design‘, Design Issues, 14, 1998, pp. 21-34
Hadlaw, Janin, ‘The London Underground Map: Imagining Modern Time and Space’, Design Issues, Vol. 19. (1), Winter 2003, pp. 25-35.
Hall, Stuart, ‘What Is This 'Black' in Black Popular Culture?’ in Gina Gent, Black Popular Culture, Seattle, Bay Press, 1992, pp. 21-23,
——— Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices, London, Sage, in association with The Open University, 1997.
Harris, E. Errol, The Reality of Time, New York, State University of New York Press, 1988
Hebdige, Dick, Hiding in the Light, Routledge, London, 1988
Heller, Steven, ‘The Origins of Graphic Design in America, 1870-1920’, Design Issues, 14 no1, 1998, pp. 84-5
——— Typology: type design from, the Victorian era to the digital age, San Francisco, Chronicle, 1999.
——— Graphic style: from Victorian to digital, New York, Harry N. Abrams, 2000
——— Merz to Emigre and Beyond: Avant-Garde Magazine Design of the Twentieth Century, London, Phaidon, 2003.
——— ‘Philip B. Meggs: Making History’, Print, 57 no1, 2003,pp. 24-5
Heller, Steven and Elinor Pettit, Graphic Design Time Line: A Century of Design Milestones, Allworth Press, 2000
Heller, Steven and Georgette Balance (eds.), Graphic design history, Allworth Press, 2001
Heller, Steven and Philip B. Meggs, ‘Making History’, Print, Vol. 57(1), 2003, pp. 24-5
Holland, DK ed., Design Issues : how graphic design informs society, Allworth Press/Communication Arts, New York, 2001
Hollis, Richard, Graphic design: a Concise History, New York, Thames and Hudson, 1994
Janson, H.W, History of Art, 6th. ed., New York, Harry N Abrams, 2001
Kelly, Rob Roy, ‘The Early Years of Graphic Design at Yale University’, Design Issues, 17 no3, Summ 2001, pp.3-14
King, Emily, New Faces: type design in the first decade of device-independent digital typesetting (1987-1997), A Doctor of Philosophy degree thesis of Kingston University, London, Kingston University, 1999
Kronz, M. Frederick, Theory and Experience of Time: Philosophical Aspects, Department of Philosophy, The University Texas at Austin, 1997
Lefebvre, Henri, The Production Space, translated by Donald Nichson-Smith, Oxford and Cambridge, Blackwell press, 1991
Levine, Robert, A Geography of Time, The temporal misadventures of social psychologies, Chicago, Basic Books, 1998
Lippincott, Kristen, The Story of Time, Merrell Holberton, London, 2000
Lorenz, Christopher, The Design Dimension: the new competitive weapon for product strategy and global marketing. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990
Meggs, Philip B., ‘Is A Design History Canon Really Dangerous?’, in Steven Heller, Design Culture, New York, Allworth Press, 1997, pp. 228-229
——— A History of Graphic Design, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1998
Margolin, Victor, Design discourse: history, theory, criticism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989
McDermott, Catherine, 20th century design, Ringwood, Vic., Viking, 1997
Nelson, H. G. and E. Stolterman, "The Case for Design: Creating a Culture of Intention." Educational Technology XL, (No. 6), 2000, pp. 29-35.
Newton-Smith, H. William, The structure of time, Oxford, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980
Palmer, Jerry and Mo Dodson (eds.), Design and Aesthetics: a Reader, London, Routledge, 1996.
Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post Critical Philosophy, London, Routledge, 1958
Poynor, Rick, ‘Optic Nerve: Canon Fodder’, Print, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2002, pp. 180-1.
Purvis, Alston W, Graphic design 20th century: 1890-1990, New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 2003
Remington, R. Roger, American modernism: graphic design 1920 to 1960, London, Laurence King, 2003
Roozenburg, N F M and J. Eekels, Product design: fundamentals and methods John Wiley and Sons, Toronto Ontario, 1995,
Rothschild, Deborah Menaker, Graphic design in the Mechanical Age: Selections from the Merrill C. Berman Collection, Yale University Press in Rudolph, Berlin, Die Gestalten Verlag, 1999
Rust, Chris, Design Enquiry: Tacit Knowledge and Invention in Science, Sheffield Hallam University, Art and Design Research Centre working paper, 8 July 2003
Sabin, Roger and Teal Triggs (eds.), Below Critical Radar: Fanzines and Alternative Comics from 1976 to now, Hove, Slab-O-Concrete Publications, 2001
Scotford, Martba, ‘Is There A Canon of Graphic design History?’, in Steven Heller and Marie Fenimore, Marie Finamore (Ed.), Design culture: an anthology of writing from the AIGA journal of graphic design, New York, Allworth Press and American Institute of Graphic Arts, 1997 pp. 218-227
Sparke, Penny, A century of design: design pioneers of the 20th century, London, Mitchell Beazley, 1998
Thomson, Ellen Mazur, “Alms for Oblivion: The History of Women in Early American Graphic Design”, Design Issues, 10:2, 1994, p. 27.
Tomlinson, John, Cultural Imperialism, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1991
Tufte, R. Edward, Envisioning Information, Connecticut, Graphics Press, 1990
Walker, John A. ‘The London Underground Diagram‘, in Triggs, Teal (ed), Communication Design: Essays in Visual Communication, London, B. T. Batsford Ltd, 1995, pp. 87-96
Walker, John A., Design history and the history of design, London, Pluto, 1989
Wood, Denis and John Fels, ‘Designs on Signs/ Myth and Meaning in Maps,’ Cartographica 23: 3, 1986, p. 66
Wurman, Richard Saul, Information Architects, Zurich, Graphis Press Corp., 1996
Share with your friends: |