W h y s o m e c o m p a n I e s m a k e t h e


" NO MIRACLE MOMENT" ING O OD TOG RE AT



Download 3.69 Mb.
View original pdf
Page65/120
Date10.02.2024
Size3.69 Mb.
#63494
1   ...   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   ...   120
Good-to-Great
" NO MIRACLE MOMENT" ING O OD TOG RE AT
Q u o t es from Abbott "It wasn't a blinding flash or sudden revelation from "Our change was a major change, and yet in many respects simply a series of incremental changes-this is what made that change successful. We did this in a nice way and there were always a lot of common denominators between what we had already mastered and what we were embarking Circuit City "The transition to focus on the superstore didn't pen overnight. We first considered the concept in
1974, but we didn't convert fully to Circuit City superstores until about ten years later, after we'd refined the concept and built enough momentum to bet our whole on it" Fannie Mae "There was no one magical event, no one turning point. It was a combination of things. More of an evolution, though the end results were Gillette "We didn't really make a big conscious decision or launch a big program to initiate a major change or transition. Individually and collectively we were coming to conclusions about what we could do to
Kimberly-Clark "I don't think it was done as bluntly as it sounds. These things don't happen overnight. They grow. The ideas grow and mushroom and come into Kroger "It wasn't a flash from the blue. We had all been watching experimental superstores develop, and we were pretty well persuaded that the industry would go that way. The major thing that Lyle did was to say that we're going to change beginning now, on a very deliberate

Good to Great
Nucor "We did not make a decision that this was what we stood for at any specific moment. It evolved through many agonizing arguments and fights. I am not sure that we knew exactly what we were fighting for until we looked back and said that we were fighting to establish who we were going to Philip Morris "Its impossible to think of one big thing that would exemplify a shift from good to great because our success was evolutionary as opposed to revolutionary, building success upon success. I don't know that there was any single event"
Pitney Bowes "We didn't talk so much of change. We recognized early on not so much that we needed to change, but that we needed to evolve, which recognizes that we've got to do things differently. We realized that evolution
Walgreens "There was no seminal meeting or epiphany moment, no one big bright light that came on like a lightbulb. It was sort of an evolution Wells "It wasn't a single switch that was thrown atone time. Little by little, the themes became more apparent and stronger. When Carl became CEO, there wasn't any great wrenching. Dick led one stage of evolution and Carl the next, and it just proceeded smoothly, rather than an abrupt When teaching this point, I sometimes use an example from outside my research that perfectly illustrates the idea the Bruins basketball dynasty of the sand early s. Most basketball fans know that the Bruins won ten NCAA Championships in twelve years, atone point assembling a sixty-one-game winning streak, under the legendary coach John But do you know how many years Wooden coached the Bruins before his first NCAA Championship Fifteen. From 1948 to 1963, Wooden worked in relative obscurity before winning his first championship in
1964. Year by year, Coach Wooden built the underlying foundations,


172
Collins
veloping a recruiting system, implementing a consistent philosophy, and refining the full-court-press style of play. No one paid too much attention to the quiet, soft-spoken coach and his team hit breakthrough and systematically crushed every serious competitor for more than a decade. Like the Wooden dynasty, lasting transformations from good to great follow a general pattern of buildup followed by breakthrough. In some cases, the buildup-to-breakthrough stage takes along time, in other cases, a shorter time. At Circuit City, the buildup stage lasted nine years, at
Nucor ten years, whereas at Gillette it took only five years, at Fannie Mae three years, and at Pitney Bowes about two years. But, no matter how short or long it took, every good-to-great transformation followed the same basic pattern- accumulating momentum, turn by turn of the until buildup transformed into breakthrough.

Download 3.69 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   ...   120




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page