Bibliography Abd El Halim

Download 0.6 Mb.
Size0.6 Mb.
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

Schwartz RS, Fransman R. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics, materials, clinical strategies and procedures for restoration of access cavities: a review. J Endod, 31(3), 151-65, 2005.

  • Scotti N, Rota R, Scansetti M, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Pasqualini D, Berutti E. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent, 110(5), 376-82, 2013.

  • Sedgley CMMesser HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod, 18(7), 332-5, 1992.

  • Seow LL, Toh CGWilson NH. Remaining tooth structure associated with various preparation designs for the endodontically treated maxillary second premolar. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 13(2), 57-64, 2005.

  • Shafiei FAkbarian S. Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration, effect of simultaneous bonding. Oper Dent, 39(1), 22-30, 2014.

  • Shafiei F, Akbarian S. Microleakage of nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer/silorane- or methacrylate-based composite sandwich Class II restoration, effect of simultaneous bonding. Oper Dent, 39(1), 2014.

  • Shafiei F, Tavangar MS, Ghahramani Y, Fattah Z. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored by silorane-based composite with or without fiber or nano-ionomer. J Adv Prosthodont, 6(3), 200-6, 2014.
  • Shah P, Gugwad SC, Bhat C, Lodaya R. Effect of three different core materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated deciduous mandibular second molars: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract, 13(1), 66-70, 2012.

  • Shanthala GSXavier MK. The effect of thermocycling on fracture toughness and hardness of different core build up materials. Indian J Dent Res, 24(6), 653-8, 2013.

  • Shokouhinejad N, Sharifian MR, Aligholi M, Assadian H, Tabor RK, Nekoofar MH. The sealing ability of resilon and gutta-parcha following different smear layer removal methods: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 110(1), 45-9, 2010.

  • Sim TPKnowles JCNg YLShelton JGulabivala K. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on mechanical properties of dentine and tooth surface strain. Int Endod J, 34(2), 120-32, 2011.
  • Simamoto Jr PC, Soares CJ, Noritomi PY, Santos-Filho PC. Effect of the crown, post, and remaining coronal dentin on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent, 111(3), 234-46, 2014.

  • Siso SH, Hürmüzlü F, Turgut M, Altundaşar E, Serper A, Er K. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Int Endod J. 40, 161–8, 2007. 

  • Slutzky-Goldberg I, Slutzky H, Gorfil C, Smidt A. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth review and treatment recommendations. Int J Dent., Article ID 150251, 2009.

  • Soares CJPizi ECFonseca RBMartins LR. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Braz Oral Res, 19(1), 11-6, 2005.

  • Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Gomide HA, Araujo CA, Martins LR, Soares CJ. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part 11, Strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent, 99, 114–22, 2008.

  • Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Queiroz EC, Araújo TC, Campos RE, Araújo CA, Soares CJ. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. J Prosthodont, 17(2), 114-9, 2008.

  • Sobhani OEGulabivala KKnowles JCNg YL. The effect of irrigation time, root morphology and dentine thickness on tooth surface strain when using 5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. Int Endod J, 43(3), 190-9, 2010.

  • Sornkul EStannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod, 18(9), 440-3, 1992.

  • Sorrentino R, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Zarone F, Tay FR, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Effect of post retained composite restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth related to the amount of coronal residual structure. Am J Dent, in press. 66, 2006.

  • Souza EMCalixto AMLima CNPappen FGDe-Deus G. Similar influence of stabilized alkaline and neutral sodium hypochlorite solutions on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated bovine teeth. J Endod, 40(10), 1600-3, 2014.

  • Sparrius O, Grossman ES. Marginal leakage of composite resin restorations in combination with dentinal andenamel bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent, 61(6), 678-84, 1989.

  • Sterzenbach G, Karajouli G, Naumann M, Peroz I, Bitter K. Fiber post placement with core build-up materials or resin cements-an evaluation of different adhesive approaches. Acta Odontol Scand, 70(5), 368-76, 2012.

  • Sterzenbach G, Kalberlah S, Beuer F, Frankenberger R, Naumann M. In-vitro simulation of tooth mobility for static and dynamic load tests: a pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand, 69(5), 316-8, 2011.

  • Sulaiman AO, Shaba OP, Dosumu OO, Ajayi DM. Coronal tissue loss in endodontically treated teeth. Afr J Med Med Sci, 41(4), 437-44, 2012.
  • Sungurtekin-Ekci E, Ozdemir-Ozenen D, Duman S, Acuner IC, Sandalli N. Antibacterial surface properties of various fluoride-releasing restorative materials in vitro. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater, 13(2), e pub ahead of print, 2014.

  • Tabatabaei MH, Sadrai S, Bassir SH, Veisy N, Dehghan S. Effect of food stimulated liquids and thermocycling on the monomer elution from a nanofilled composite. Open Dent J, 7, 62-7, 2013.

  • Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations. J Dent, 39(8), 527-35, 2011.

  • Taha NAPalamara JEMesser HH. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites. J Dent, 37(9), 724-30, 2009.

  • Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth. J Dent, 40(8), 617-23, 2012.
  • Taleghani M, Morgan RW. Reconstructive materials for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent, 57(4), 446-9, 1987.

  • Tamse AFuss ZLustig JKaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J Endod, 25(7), 506-8, 1999.

  • Tang WWu YSmales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod, 36(4), 609-17, 2010.

  • Tay FR, Loushine RJ, Monticelli F, Weller RN, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Pashley DH. Effectiveness of resin-coated gutta-percha cones and a dual-cured, hydrophilic methacrylate resin-based sealer in obturating root canals. J Endod, 31, 659-64, 2005.

  • Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals, a hypothetical or a tangible Goal. J Endod, 55, 591-8, 2007.

  • Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in root canals, a hypothetical or a tangible goal. J Endod.  , 33(4), 391-8, 2007.
  • Teixeira CS, Felippe MC, Felippe WT. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis. Int Endod J, 38(5), 285-90, 2005.

  • Teixeira FB, Teixeira EC, Thompson JY, Trope M. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc, 135, 646–52, 2004.

  • Testori T, Badino M, Castagnola M. Review of the international literature on the etiology of vertical root fractures. G Ital Endod, 4(3), 44-7, 1990.

  • Topçuoğlu HSTuncay ÖKarataş EArslan HYeter K. In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin-based, mineral trioxide aggregate-based, and bioceramic root canal sealers. J Endod, 39(12), 1630-3, 2013.

  • Torabzadeh H, Ghassemi A, Sanei M, Razmavar S, Sheikh-Al-Eslamian SM. The Influence of Composite Thickness with or without Fibers on Fracture Resistance of Direct Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth. Iran Endod J, 9(3), 215-9, 2014.

  • Touré B, Faye B, Kane AW, Lo CM, Niang B, Boucher Y. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: a prospective study. J Endod, 37(11), 1512-5, 2011.

  • Tronstad L, Asbjørnsen K, Døving L, Pedersen I, Eriksen HM. Influence of coronal restorations on the periapical health of endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol, 16(5), 218-21, 2000.

  • Trope M, Langer I, Maltz D, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated premolars. Endod Dent Traumatol, 2(1), 35-8,1986.

  • Trope M, Ray HL Jr. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 73(1), 99-102, 1992.

  • Tselnik MBaumgartner JCMarshall JG. Bacterial leakage with mineral trioxide aggregate or a resin-modified glass ionomer used as a coronal barrier. J Endod, 30(11), 782-4, 2004.

  • Khan SIAnupama RDeepalakshmi MKumar KS.Effect of two different types of  fibers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with composite resin. J Adhes Dent, 15(2), 167-71, 2013.

  • Ulusoy OI, Genç O, Arslan S, Alaçam TGörgül G. Fracture resistance of roots obturated with three different materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 104(5), 705-8, 2007.

  • Ungor M, Onay EO, Orucoglu H. Push-out bond strengths, the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha. Int Endod J, 39(8), 643-7, 2006.
  • Upadhyay S, Rao A, Shenoy R. Comparison of the amount of fluoride release from nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer, conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements. J Dent (Tehran), 10(2), 134-40, 2013.

  • Upadhyay S, Rao A. Nanoionomer, evaluation of microleakage. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 29(1), 20-4, 2011.

  • Uyehara MY, Davis RDOverton JD. Cuspal reinforcement in endodontically treated molars. Oper Dent, 24(6), 364-70, 1999.

  • Uzunoglu EAktemur SUyanik MODurmaz VNagas E. Effect of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on root fracture with respect to concentration at different time exposures. J Endod, 38(8), 1110-3, 2012.

  • Vârlan C, Dimitriu B, Vârlan V, Bodnar D, Suciu I. Current opinions concerning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth, basic principles. J Med Life, 2(2), 165-72, 2009.

  • Varvara G, Perinetti GDi Iorio DMurmura GCaputi S. In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance and failure mode of internally restored endodontically treated maxillary incisors with differing heights of residual dentin. J Prosthet Dent, 98(5), 365-72, 2007.

  • Versluis A, Messer HH, Pintado MR. Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation. Int Endod J, 39(12), 931-9, 2006.
  • Joan Mathew, Jonathan Emil, Benin Paulaian, Bejoy John, Jacob Raja, Jean Mathew.Viability and antibacterial efficacy of four root canal disinfection techniques evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy.17 ,5,444-448,2014.

  • Vipin Arora , M P Yadav , S P Singh , Pooja Arora , Preeti Choudhary. Effect of Adhesive Obturation and Post Obturation Monoblock Systems on Reinforcement of Peri-Cervical Dentin (PCD). Int J Biotech Trends Tech (IJBTT), 8(1), 1-6, 2015.

  • Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth, classification and evaluation. J Endod, 17(7), 338-42, 1991.

  • Vishwanathan PK,, Muliyar SChavan PReddy PMReddy TPNilawar S. Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of teeth prepared with rotary system, filled with single cone gutta-percha and laterally condensed with zinc oxide eugenol and resin based (AH26) sealers to that of Resilon. J Contemp Dent Pract, 13(6), 773-81, 2012.

  • Vukicevic AM, Zelic K, Jovicic G, Djuric M, Filipovic N. Influence of dental restorations and mastication loadings on dentine fatigue behaviour: Image-based modelling approach. J Dent, 43(5), 556-67, 2015.

  • White JD, Lacefield WR, Chavers LS, Eleazer PD. The effect of three commonly used endodontic materials on the strength and hardness of root dentin. J Endod, 28(12), 828-30, 2002.

  • Williams C, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Pashley DH, Tay FR. A comparison of cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod, 32, 553–5, 2006.

  • Williams JV, Williams LR. Is coronal restoration more important than root filling for ultimate endodontic success? SADJ, 65(6), 254-6, 2010.

  • Winter W, Karl M. Dehydration-induced shrinkage of dentin as a potential cause of vertical root fractures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 14, 1-6, 2012.

  • Wolcott JF, Hicks ML, Himel VT. Evaluation of pigmented intraorifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. J Endod, 25(9), 589-92, 1999.

  • Wu Y, Cathro P, Marino V. Fracture resistance and pattern of the upper premolars with obturated canals and restored endodontic occlusal access cavities. JBiomed Res, 24(6), 474-8, 2010.

  • Xie DBrantley WACulbertson BMWang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater,16(2), 129-38, 2000.

  • Fuss Z, Lustig J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth, impact of operative procedures. J Endod, 27(1), 46-8, 2001.

  • Xie KX, Wang XYGao XJYuan CYLi JXChu CH. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Int Endod J, 45(6), 524-9, 2012.

  • Xu YWang RAn BZhou YYu HZhang D. The effect of bleaching on fracture resistance in human dentin. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, 30(5), 530-4, 2012.

  • Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont, 17(1), 94-8, 2004.

  • Yardley RM. Custom core construction using glass-ionomer cements. Dent Update, 17(3), 124-7, 1990.

  • Yavari HR, Samiei M, Shahi S, Aghazadeh M, Jafari F, Abdolrahimi M, Asgary S. Microleakage comparison of four dental materials as intra-orifice barriers in endodontically treated teeth. Iran Endod J, 7(1), 25-30, 2012.

  • Yıkılgan I, Bala O. How can stress be controlled in endodontically treated teeth? A 3D finite element analysis. The Scientific World J, 2013 ,15, ID 426134, 2013.

  • Yoshino K, Ito K, Kuroda M, Sugihara N. Prevalence of vertical root fracture as the reason for tooth extraction in dental clinics. Clin Oral Investig, 19(6),1405-9,2015.

  • Zadik Y, Sandler V, Bechor R, Salehrabi R. Analysis of factors related to extraction of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106(5), 31-5, 2008.

  • Zakizadeh PMarshall SJHoover CIPeters OANoblett WCGansky SAGoodis HE. A novel approach in assessment of coronal leakage of intraorifice barriers: a saliva leakage and micro-computed tomographic evaluation. J Endod, 34(7), 871-5, 2008.

  • Zamin C, Silva-Sousa YT, Souza-Gabriel AE, Messias DF, Sousa-Neto MD. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol, 28(4), 282-6, 2012.

  • Zandbiglari T, Davids H, Schäfer E. Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 101(1), 126-31, 2006.

  • Zarei MAfkhami FMalek Poor Z. Fracture resistance of human root dentin exposed to calcium hydroxide intervisit medication at various time periods: an in vitro study. Dent Traumatol, 29(2), 156-60, 2013.

  • Zelic K, Vukicevic AJovicic GAleksandrovic SFilipovic NDjuric M. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis and prediction of tooth fracture. Int Endod J. ,48(9),850-63, 2015.

  • Zeng YWang JD. Establishment of the three-dimensional finite element model of the first permanent mandibular molar and its stress analysis. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi,40(5), 394-7, 2005.

  • Zhang K, Kim YK, Cadenaro M, Bryan TE, Sidow SJ, Loushine RJ, Ling JQ, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of different exposure times and concentrations of sodium hypochlorite/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on the structural integrity of mineralized dentin. J Endod, 36(1), 105-9, 2010.

  • Zogheib LV, Saavedra Gde S, Cardoso PE, Valera MC, Araújo MA. Resistance to compression of weakened roots subjected to different root reconstruction protocols. J Appl Oral Sci, 19(6), 648-54, 2011.


    Download 0.6 Mb.

    Share with your friends:
  • 1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10

    The database is protected by copyright © 2020
    send message

        Main page