Florida public service commissionFlorida public service commission
Florida Power & Light Company (“fpl” or the “Company”) files with the Florida Public Service Commission (the “psc” or the “Commission”) its Post-Hearing Brief in the above-referenced docket, and states
0.51 Mb. 14
read
Not to be published in the official reportsNot to be published in the official reports
California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b)
21.18 Kb. 1
read
Not to be published in the official reportsNot to be published in the official reports
California Rules of Court, rule 1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 1115(b)
52.25 Kb. 1
read
U. S. News & World Report deems importantU. S. News & World Report deems important
The Article recommends strategies for schools that might wish to escape the rankings game and concludes by asserting that many law schools will have a difficult time adapting to modern challenges if they are motivated primarily by what U
256.89 Kb. 6
read
Department of Memorandum Veterans AffairsDepartment of Memorandum Veterans Affairs
Subj: Eligibility for Automobile Assistance in Relation to Compensation for Disability “As If” Service Connected--38 U. S. C. §§ 1151(a) and 3901(1)(A); 38 C. F. R. § 808
26.5 Kb. 1
read
Mark kappelhoffMark kappelhoff
Other individuals are homeless because of circumstances beyond their control; they are victims of domestic violence and trafficking
70.17 Kb. 1
read
Dynacore holdings corporationDynacore holdings corporation
David W. Denenberg, Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, P. C., of New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Peter T. Cobrin and Oren J. Warshavsky
69.4 Kb. 1
read
Apple Computer V. Microsoft (9th Cir. 1994) (Rymer) apple computer, inc V. Microsoft corporationApple Computer V. Microsoft (9th Cir. 1994) (Rymer) apple computer, inc V. Microsoft corporation
Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), introduced NewWave 0 and later, NewWave 0, which run in conjunction with Windows to make ibm- compatible computers easier to use
34.5 Kb. 1
read
977 F. 2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1993)977 F. 2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1993)
William S. Coats,Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant appellant
138.86 Kb. 3
read
United states of america postal regulatory commission washington, dcUnited states of america postal regulatory commission washington, dc
On June 16, 2016, the Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) filed a motion requesting certain data, explanations, and documents in this docket. 1 For the reasons discussed below, the Commission grants the Motion in part
40.63 Kb. 1
read
Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies and Lawrence J. Spiwak (1998). Utility Entry into Telecommunications: Exactly How Serious Are We? Lawrence J. SpiwakPhoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies and Lawrence J. Spiwak (1998). Utility Entry into Telecommunications: Exactly How Serious Are We? Lawrence J. Spiwak
Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies and Lawrence J. Spiwak (1998)
244.32 Kb. 11
read
Federal Communications Commission fcc 01-22Federal Communications Commission fcc 01-22
Reply Comment Date: (90 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register)
0.64 Mb. 13
read
Before the iowa workers’ compensation commissionerBefore the iowa workers’ compensation commissioner
Dale Jackson, has brought against the non-insured employer, Greg Newell Trucking, Inc, and against the employer, Atlantic Carriers and its insurance carrier, Great West Casualty
74.34 Kb. 1
read
Filed u. S. Court of appeals eleventh circuit june 13, 2002 thomas k. Kahn clerkFiled u. S. Court of appeals eleventh circuit june 13, 2002 thomas k. Kahn clerk
On each of petitioners’ remaining challenges to the fcc guidelines, we decline to disturb the fcc’s determinations
99.39 Kb. 1
read
1. Chevron, U. S. A., Inc v. Natural Resources Defense Council1. Chevron, U. S. A., Inc v. Natural Resources Defense Council
Chevron, U. S. A., Inc v. Natural Resources Defense Council, (1984); pg. 128, briefed 9/5/96
116.49 Kb. 1
read

  1   2




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2022
send message

    Main page