CDSS are an evolving technology with potential for wide applicability, to individualize and improve patient outcome and health care resource utilization. However, to make CDSS more helpful it requires thoughtful design, implementation and critical evaluation.
As mentioned earlier the promise of CDSS has been around since the 1960s. In 2008, Simon et al. still found that the vast majority of EHRs across the U.S.A. implemented little or any decision support. A recent survey send out to all Dutch hospital pharmacies showed similar disappointing results, only 48% of them using some kind of advanced CDSS .
Such alarming results were one of the main reasons the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) published the Roadmap for National Action on Clinical Decision Support. The paper acknowledged six strategic objectives, divided into three main pillars, for achieving widespread adoption of effective clinical decision support system capabilities . The three main pillars being: (1) High Adoption and Effective Use. (2) Best Knowledge Available When Needed. (3) Continuous Improvement of Knowledge and CDSS Methods . In the following paragraphs these three pillars will be highlighted to give an overview of tasks and challenges that lay ahead.