Computing Point-of-View: Modeling and Simulating Judgments of Taste



Download 438.05 Kb.
Page8/8
Date18.10.2016
Size438.05 Kb.
#1905
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8

5 Timeline


I plan to finish refactoring technical implementations and complete all evaluations by early February 2006, and the thesis and defence by the end of the spring term 2006.

6 Resources


No additional resources are required, beyond typical access to Media Lab resources, and opportunities to travel to meet with non-local readers.

References

Aberer, K. et al.: 2004, Emergent semantics. Proc. of 9th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA 2004), LNCS 2973, 25-38 Heidelberg.

Austin, J. L.: 1962, How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge (MA): Harvard UP.

Bakhtin, M.: 1935, The Dialogic Imagination, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Barthes, R.: 1964/1967, Elements of Semiology. (Translated by Annette Lavers & Colin Smith). London: Jonathan Cape.

Bourdieu, P.: 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Trans. Richard Nice), Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bradley, M.M., & P.J. Lang: 1999, Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.

Briggs, K. C., & I. B. Myers: 1976, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Form F, Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press

Brooks, R.: 1991, Intelligence Without Representation, Artificial Intelligence Journal (47): 139-159

Charniak, E.: 1972, Toward a Model of Children Story Comprehension. MIT School of EECS PhD Thesis.

Collins, A. M., and E. F. Loftus: 1975, A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing, Psychological Review 82: 407-428.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., E. Rochberg-Halton: 1981, The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self, Cambridge University Press.

Deerwester, S., S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, R. Harshman: 1990, Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis, Journal of the Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391-407.

Dennett, D.: 1987, The Intentional Stance, Bradford Books.

Doyle, J.: 1980/1987, A truth maintenance system, in Reading in nonmonotonic reasoning: 259-279, Morgan Kaufmann.

Dunne, A.: 1999, Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience and critical design. London, RCACRD Research Publications.

Dyer, M.G.: 1983, In-depth understanding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner: 2002, The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities, Basic Books.

Freud, S.: 1901, The psychopathology of everyday life.

Freud, S.: 1905/1963, Jokes and their relation to the unconscious, WW Norton.

Gallese, V. and A. Goldman: 1998, Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(12): 493-501

Gärdenfors, P. and K. Holmqvist: 1994, Concept formation in dimensional spaces, Lund University Cognitive Studies 26.

Gaver, W.: 2001, Designing for Ludic Aspects of Everyday Life, ERCIM News No. 47.

Geertz, C.: 1973, The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic.

Georgeff, M.P. et al.: 1998, The Belief-Desire-Intention Model of Agency. In N. Jenning, J. Muller, and M. Wooldridge (eds.), Intelligent Agents V. Springer.

Gentner, D.: 1983, Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science 7: 155-170.

Habermas, J.: 1981/1985, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1, Beacon Press.

Hegel, G. W. F.: 1807, Phänomenologie des Geistes.

Horvitz, E. et al.: 1998, The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users, Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in AI.

Hume, D.: 1748, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.

Jakobson, R.: 1960, Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics, in Style in Language, ed. T.A. Sebeok: 350-77, New York: Wiley.

Joachims, T.: 1998, Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features, Proceedings of ECML-98, 10th European Conference on Machine Learning, edited by Claire Nédellec and Céline Rouveirol: 137-142, Springer-Verlag.

Jung, C. G.: 1921/1971, Psychological Types, trans. by H. G. Baynes, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kaelbling, L.P., L.M. Littman and A.W. Moore: 1996, Reinforcement learning: a survey, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4:237—285

Krueger, M.W.: 1983, Artificial Reality, Addison-Wesley.

Kruskal, J. B., and M. Wish, 1978, Multidimensional Scaling, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Application in the Social Sciences, 07-011. Beverly Hills and London: Sage Publications.

Lacan, J.: 1957, The agency of the letter in the unconscious, or reason since Freud, La Psychoanalyse 3: 47-81.

Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson: 1980, Metaphors We Live by, University of Chicago Press.

Latour, B.: 2005, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press.

Lenat, D.: 1995, Cyc: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM 38(11). ACM Press.

Levine, D.N. (ed.): 1971, On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings of Georg Simmel, University of Chicago Press.

Lieberman, H.: 1997, Autonomous Interface Agents, Proceedings of CHI 1997.

Liu, H.: 2002, MontyLingua: Commonsense-Enriched NLP, Toolkit and API. Accessed at: http://web.media.mit.edu/hugo/montylingua/

Liu, H.: 2003, Unpacking meaning from words: a context-centered approach to computational lexicon design, Blackburn et al. (Eds.): Modeling and Using Context, LNCS 2680: 218-232, Springer.

Liu, H., G. Davenport: 2005, Self-reflexive performance: dancing with the computed audience of culture , International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 1(3), Intellect Ltd.

Liu, H., M. Hockenberry & T. Selker: 2005, Synesthetic Recipes: foraging for food with the family, in taste-space, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA.

Liu, H., H. Lieberman and T. Selker: 2003, A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2003, 125-132, ACM Press.

Liu, H. and P. Maes: 2004, What Would They Think? A Computational Model of Attitudes. Proc. of the 2004 ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 38-45. ACM Press.

Liu, H. and P. Maes: 2005a, InterestMap: harvesting social network profiles for recommendations, Proceedings of ACM Beyond Personalization 2005: A Workshop on the Next Stage of Recommender Systems Research, 54-59, ACM Press.

Liu, H. and P. Maes: 2005b, The Aesthetiscope: Visualizing Aesthetic Readings of Text in Color Space. Proceedings of FLAIRS2005: 74-79, AAAI Press.

Liu, H., P. Maes, G. Davenport: 2006, Unraveling the taste fabric of social networks, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 2(1): 46-78, Hershey, PA: Idea Academic Publishers.

Liu, H. and P. Singh: 2004a, Commonsense reasoning in and over natural language, M Negoita, RJ Howlett, LC Jain (Eds.): Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, LNCS 3215:293-306, Springer.

Liu, H. and P. Singh: 2004b, ConceptNet: A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Toolkit. BT Technology Journal 22(4), 211-226. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Maes, P.: 1994, Modeling Adaptive Autonomous Agents, Artificial Life Journal, C. Langton, ed., Vol. 1, No. 1 & 2, MIT Press

Minsky, M.: 1992, Future of AI Technology, Toshiba Review 47(7).

Minsky, M.: forthcoming, The Emotion Machine, Pantheon.

Montgomery, H.: 1994, Towards a perspective theory of decision making and judgment, Acta Psychol (Amst) 87(2-3):155-78.

Moorman, K. and A. Ram: 1994, Integrating creativity and reading: A functional approach. In Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

Mueller, E. T.: 2000, ThoughtTreasure: A natural language/commonsense platform. Accessed on 11 November 2005 from http://www.signiform.com/tt/

Murray, K.: 1990, Life as fiction, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne

Narayanan, S.S.: 1997, Knowledge-based action representations for metaphor and aspect (KARMA) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley

Newell, A.: 1990, Unified Theories of Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Newell, A. and H. A. Simon: 1963, GPS, a program that simulates human thought. In E. A. Feigenbaum and J. Feldman (eds.), Computers and Thought: 279-293. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ortony, A., G.L. Clore, M.A. Foss: 1987, The Referential Structure of the Affective Lexicon, Cognitive Science 11(3): 341-364.

Ortony, A., G. L. Clore, A. Collins: 1988, Cognitive Structure of Emotions, Cambridge University Press.

Orwant, J.: 1995, Hereterogeneous Learning in the Doppelganger User Modelling System. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction, 4(2):107-130.

Papert, S., and I. Harel: 1991, Situating constructionism, in Constructionism, Ablex Publishing Corp.

Pollack, M.: 1992, The uses of plans, AI Journal:57

Poulet, G.: 1980, Criticism and the Experience of Interiority, in J.P. Tompkins (Ed.) Reader-Response Criticism.

Ram, A.: 1994, AQUA: Questions that drive the explanation process. In Roger C. Schank, Alex Kass, & Christopher K. Riesbeck (Eds.), Inside case-based explanation: 207-261, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reeves, B. and C. Nass: 1996, The media equation: How people treat computers, television and new media like real people and places, CSLI / Cambridge University Press.

Rhodes, B. and P. Maes: 2000, Just-in-time information retrieval agents, IBM Systems Journal 39(4): 685-704.

Rich, E.: 1979, User modeling via stereotypes, Cognitive Science.

Ricoeur, P.: 1965/1970, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, transl. Denis Savage, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Riesbeck, C.K. and R.C. Schank: 1989, Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

Roget, P.: 1911, Roget’s Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases. Retrieved from gutenberg.net/etext/10681

Rosenblatt, L.: 1978, Efferent and Aesthetic Reading, The Reader, The Text, The Poem: A Transactional Theory of the Literary Work: 22-47, Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.

Sack, W.: 1994, On the Computation of Point of View, Proceedings of the National Conference of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 94), Seattle, WA., July 31-August 4.

Sack, W.: 2001, Actor-Role Analysis: Ideology, Point of View and the News, New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective (Will Van Peer and Seymour Chatman, Editors) New York: SUNY Press.

Schank, R. C. and R. P. Abelson: 1977, Script, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schleiermacher, F.: 1809/1998, General Hermeneutics, in A. Bowie (Ed.) Schleiermacher: Hermeneutics and Criticism: 227-268. Cambridge University Press.

Shardanand, U. and P. Maes: 1995, Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating `word of mouth'. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 210-217.

Silverman, K.: 1983, The subject in semiotics, Oxford University Press.

Singh, P., T. Lin, E. T. Mueller, G. Lim, T. Perkins, W. L. Zhu: 2002, Open Mind Common Sense: knowledge acquisition from the general public. Proceedings of ODBASE’2002.

Sloman, A.: 1981, Why robots will have emotions. Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

Stanfill, C. and D. Waltz: 1986, Toward memory-based reasoning, Communications of the ACM 29(12): 1213-1228.

Tulving, E.: 1983, Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: New York

Wheeless, L. and J. Grotz: 1977, The Measurement of Trust and Its Relationship to Self-disclosure. Communication Research 3(3): 250-257.

Winograd, T.: 1971, Procedures as a Representation for Data in a Computer Program for Understanding Natural Language. MIT AI Technical Report 235.

Zwaan, R.A. and G.A. Radvansky: 1998, Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2): 162-185



Candidate Biography

Hugo Liu is America On-Line Fellow and a dissertation-year Ph.D. candidate in the Media Arts & Sciences program of the MIT School of Architecture and Planning. Liu is developing a research programme around the computation of point-of-view and aesthetic experience, to culminate in the AAAI-2006 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Beauty and Happiness, which he will co-chair. Inspired by literary theory and informed by artificial intelligence computation, Liu's investigations span the computational modelling of, inter alia, emotion, aesthetics, culture, common sense, gustation, identity, and more recently, he has published on the semantics of happiness and time perception. Liu has published over two dozen articles and spoken extensively around these thematics— his work is recognized with two best paper prizes and has been covered by media such as Slashdot, Technology Review, and New York Times Magazine. He is author of the ConceptNet common sense reasoning research package and the popular MontyLingua natural language understanding package. Liu’s scholarly activities have included service on programme committees of international conferences, reviewerships for major journals and magazines, and keynotes and invited panel presentations. Liu holds bachelors' and masters' degrees in Computer Science from MIT.



1 Jung means his key words ‘think’, ‘feel’, ‘intuit’, and ‘sensing’ differently from their common sense.

2 One critic asks how this is consistent with my theoretical framework which prescribes that there be a cultural space which contains all possible materials within it. My reply is that the cultural space of possibilities can indeed be generated as a tensor of all possible symbols and linguistic ‘sentences’, and for each symbol and sentence, there is the 4D Jungian tensor of interpretations of that symbol. Hence, the cultural space of aesthetic perception becomes a space of spaces.

3 There is a fine point to be made on designating interests as semes rather than as classemes. A classeme is not well defined—it is merely a dominant or intratextual seme. Clearly a single interest can constitute a global thematic for a person, as some have structured their tastes around “Star Trek” or “Elvis.” Operationally, interest-semes and subculture-classemes are implemented similarly, but the promotion of subculture to classeme, above interests, is simply meant to illuminate that subcultures generally play a greater role as semantic mediator.

4 All numbers given herein were accurate as of summer, 2004

5 a qualifying clique edge is defined here as an edge whose strength is in the 80th percentile, or greater, of all edges

6 by discounting a random 50% subset of the clique’s edges by a Gaussian

factor (0.5 mu, 0.2 sigma).




7 I do not mean to indicate that these five viewpoint realms offer a complete or canonical account of an individual’s point-of-view. Rather, they are examples of some viewpoint realms which might be considered by common sense to be significant.

8 Due to the smaller scope of the planned study and the anticipated strength of bias introduced by age (younger folks might naturally be more reflexively exuberant), the subject pool will not be bifurcated, but rather, all subjects will see both control and actual mirrors.



Download 438.05 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page