Computing Services for Disabled Students in Institutions of Higher Education



Download 42.44 Kb.
Date31.01.2017
Size42.44 Kb.
#13105

Computing Services for Disabled Students in


Institutions of Higher Education

by


Sheryl Burgstahler
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

University of Washington

©1992

In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with "fair use" as prescribed in the U. S. copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to University Microfilms, 1490 Eisenhower Place, P.O. Box 975, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, to whom the author has granted "the right to reproduce and sell (a) copies of the manuscript in microform and/or (b) printed copies of the manuscript made from microform."



University of Washington
Abstract
Computing Services for Disabled Students in

Institutions of Higher Education


by Sheryl Burgstahler
Chairperson of Supervisory Committee: Professor Steven Olswang

College of Education

University of Washington
Individuals with disabilities have faced substantial barriers in pursuing higher education. Few institutions made serious efforts to be accessible until legislation demanded nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap. Federal legislation is generally interpreted to mean that schools must provide access to computers with appropriate adaptive technology to students with disabilities when such access is required to pursue academic studies. Accommodations are to be made in the most integrated setting appropriate. However, for many disabled students, discrimination in access to computing resources persists.

This study explores issues surrounding the provision of computing services to disabled students in institutions of higher education. The results of a survey of schools with enrollments of 1,000 or more students reveal that computing services for students with disabilities are underdeveloped at many schools, with some schools providing no services in this area. The office of disabled student services is the organizational unit most involved in the selection, funding, and management of the services that are provided. Two-year, public, and larger schools tend to provide a greater number of computing services for disabled students and a greater number of types of adaptive devices and to assign staff to specifically support disabled students than four-year, private, and smaller schools, respectively. Access to electronic services for students with disabilities is very limited at most schools. Those who provide some computing services for students with disabilities tend to integrate them into facilities used by other students and this integrated model is generally preferred by staff. Staff generally rate moderately high both the abilities of disabled students to make productive use of computers and the contribution computers make to the academic success of these students. They consider funding the greatest barrier to providing computing services to students with disabilities.

The results of this study may help administrators make better decisions regarding the provision of computing services to students with disabilities and thereby better serve these students. The results suggest that institutions must make greater efforts to assure nondiscrimination on the basis of disability regarding access to computing services.
Table of Contents
Page

List of Figures ii

List of Tables iii

Chapter I: Introduction 1

The Research Problem

The Research Question

Definition of Terms

Chapter II: Review of the Literature on Discrimination in Higher

Education 6

Treatment of Individuals with Disabilities

Treatment of Other Underrepresented Groups

Summary


Chapter III: Review of Research on Disabled Student Services 63

Analysis and Conclusions

Summary

Chapter IV: Discussion of Computing Services for Disabled Students 81



Adaptive Technology that Provides Computer Access

Online Services

Summary

Chapter V: Research Purpose, Methodology, and Demographics 96



Purpose

Methodology

Demographics

Chapter VI: Research Results and Discussion 110

Responses and Discussion

Limitations of the Study

Chapter VII: Conclusions and Recommendations 154

Survey Conclusions

Recommendations

Epilogue


Bibliography 172

Appendix A: Data Collection Instrument 194

Appendix B: Summary of Responses 199

Appendix C: Statistical Tables 241

List of Figures
Number Page
1. Proportion of Two-Year School and Four-Year School Respondents 106

2. Proportion of Public School and Private School Respondents 107

3. Total Enrollment of Schools Responding to Survey 108

4. Total Disabled Student Enrollment of Schools Responding to Survey 108

5. Number of Respondents with Various Self-Ratings of Computer Skills 109

6. Number of Schools with Adaptive Technology in Various Locations 135

List of Tables
Number Page
1. Sources of Research Studies 64

2. Characteristics of Research Studies 65

3. Research Questions Addressed by Studies 66

4. Number of Research Studies Published Each Decade 66



5. Types of Disabilities Addressed in Research Studies 69
6. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Selecting Computing
Services for Disabled Students 111
7. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Funding Computing
Services for Disabled Students 111
8. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Managing Computing
Services for Disabled Students 111
9. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Selecting Computing
Services for Disabled Students: Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year
Schools 112
10. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Funding Computing
Services for Disabled Students: Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year
Schools 112
11. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Management of Computing
Services for Disabled Students: Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year
Schools 113
12. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Selecting Computing
Services for Disabled Students: Comparison of Public and Private Schools 113
13. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Funding Computing
Services for Disabled Students: Comparison of Public and Private Schools 113
14. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Management of Computing Services for Disabled Students: Comparison of Public and Private Schools 114
15. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Selecting Computing
Services for Disabled 114
16. Level of Significance of Organizational Units in Funding Computing
Services for Disabled Students: Comparisons By Size of School 114
17. Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Management of Computing Services for Disabled: Comparisons By Size of School 115
18. Percentage of Schools with Employee(s) Assigned to Provide Computing
Support to Disabled Students 117
19. Percentage of Institutions with Employee(s) Providing Computing Support to Disabled Students: Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year Schools 118
20. Percentage of Institutions with Employee(s) Providing Computing Support to Disabled Students: Comparison of Public and Private Schools 118
21. Percentage of Schools with Employee(s) Assigned to Provide Computing
Support to Disabled Students: Comparisons By Size of School 119
23. Computing Services Provided for Students with Disabilities: Comparison by Level of Involvement of Computing Services Unit in Management 122
24. Computing Services Provided for Students with Disabilities: Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year Schools 123
25. Computing Services Provided for Students with Disabilities: Comparison of Public and Private Schools 124
26. Computing Services Provided for Students with Disabilities: Comparisons By Size of School 125
27. Adaptive Computing Equipment and Software Available to Students with Disabilities 127
28. Mean Number of Adaptive Devices: Comparison of Two-Year and

Four- Year Schools 128


29. Mean Number of Adaptive Devices: Comparison of Public and Private
Schools 128
30. Mean Number of Adaptive Devices: Comparisons By Size of School 129
31. Availability of Online Services from Computers with Adaptive Devices 130
32. Availability of Online Services from Computers with Adaptive Devices:
Comparison by Level of Involvement of Computing Services Unit in
Management 130
33. Availability of Online Services from Computers with Adaptive Devices:
Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year Schools 131
34. Availability of Online Services from Computers with Adaptive Devices:
Comparison of Public and Private Schools 132
35. Availability of Online Services from Computers with Adaptive Devices:
Comparisons By Size of School 133
36. Location of Computer Adaptive Equipment and Software Provided to

Disabled Students: Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year Schools. 135


37. Percentage of Schools with Adaptive Technology in Specific Locations:
Comparison of Public and Private Schools 136
38. Percentage of Schools with Adaptive Technology in Specific Locations:
Comparisons By Size of School 136
39. Desirability of Various Locations for Placing Adaptive Technology 138
40. Comparison of Location Chosen for Placing Adaptive Technology and the Perceived Desirability of that Location. 138
41. Desirability of Various Locations for Placing Adaptive Technology:
Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year Schools 139
42. Desirability of Various Locations for Placing Adaptive Technology:
Comparison of Public and Private Schools 140
43. Desirability of Various Locations for Placing Adaptive Technology:
Comparisons By Size of School 140
44. Perceived Level of Significance of Barriers to Providing Computing
Services to Disabled Students 142
45. Perceived Level of Significance of Barriers to Providing Computing
Services to Students with Disabilities: Comparison of Two-Year and
Four-Year Schools 143
46. Perceived Level of Significance of Barriers to Providing Computing
Services to Students School 143
47. Perceived Level of Significance of Barriers to Providing Computing

Services to Disabled Students: Comparisons By Size of School 144


48. Perceived Abilities of Students with Disabilities to Make Productive Use
of Computers if Adaptive Equipment is Provided 145
49. Correlation Between Perceived Abilities of Students with Disabilities to
Make Productive Use of Computers and the Self-rated Respondent's Skill in Using Computers 146
50. Perceived Abilities of Students with Disabilities to Make Productive Use
of Computers if Adaptive Equipment is Provided: Comparison of
Two-Year and Four-year Schools 147
51. Perceived Abilities of Students with Disabilities to Make Productive Use
of Computers if Adaptive Equipment is Provided: Comparison of Public
and Private Schools 147
52. Perceived Abilities of Students with Disabilities to Make Productive Use
of Computers if Adaptive Equipment is Provided: Comparisons By Size
of School 147
53. Perceived Contribution of Computer Access to the Academic Success of
Students with Disabilities 149
54. Correlation Between Perceived Contribution of Computer Access to the
Academic Success of Students with Disabilities and the Self-rated
Respondent's Skill in Using Computers 149
55. Perceived Contribution of Computer Access to the Academic Success of
Students with Disabilities: Comparison of Two-Year and Four-Year
Schools 150
56. Perceived Contribution of Computer Access to the Academic Success of
Students with Disabilities: Comparison of Public and Private Schools 150

57. Perceived Contribution of Computer Access to the Academic Success of


Students with Disabilities: Comparisons By Size of School 150
58. Multivariate Analysis of Variance - Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in the Selection of Computing Services 241
59. Multivariate Analysis of Variance - Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Funding Computing Services 242
60. Multivariate Analysis of Variance - Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in the Management of Computing Services 243
61. Three-Way Analysis of Variance - Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in the Selection of Computing Services 244
62. Three-Way Analysis of Variance - Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in Funding Computing Services 253
63. Three-Way Analysis of Variance - Level of Involvement of Organizational Units in the Management of Computing Services 260
64. Analysis of Variance - Mean Number of Adaptive Devices 266
65. Multivariate Analysis of Variance - Desirability of Various Locations for
Placing Adaptive Technology 267
66. Three-Way Analysis of Variance - Desirability of Various Locations for
Placing Adaptive Technology 268
67. Multivariate Analysis of Variance - Perceived Level of Significance of
Barriers to Providing Computing Services to Disabled Students 272
68. Three-way Analysis of Variance - Perceived Level of Significance of
Barriers to Providing Computing Services to Disabled Students 273
69. Multivariate Analysis of Variance: Perceived Abilities of Students with
Disabilities to Make Productive Use of Computers if Adaptive Equipment is Provided 280
70. Three-way Analysis of Variance: Perceived Abilities of Students with
Disabilities to Make Productive Use of Computers if Adaptive Equipment is Provided 281
71. Multivariate Analysis of Variance - Perceived Contribution of Computers to the Academic Success of Students with Disabilities 285
72. Three-Way Analysis of Variance - Perceived Contribution of Computers
to the Academic Success of Students with Disabilities 286
Acknowledgments
The author wishes to express sincere appreciation to Professors Stephen Kerr, David Madsen, Percy Peckham, Steven Olswang, and Richard Yalch for serving on the Supervisory Committee. Dr. Yalch was particularly helpful in the development of the survey instrument and the analysis of the results. As Chairman of the Supervisory and Reading Committees, Dr. Olswang provided support and guidance in the process of completing the PhD requirements and in preparing this manuscript. His attention to broad organizational issues as well as to presentation details is greatly appreciated.


Download 42.44 Kb.

Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page