So according to the above passage, as far as Peter knew at the time, Israel was still the "seed" through whom all the nations would be blessed. After all, that is exactly
what he states in verse 25. There is no indication here that Peter even suspected Christ was the Seed through Whom
Uncircumcised Gentiles would one day be blessed, as Paul would later reveal in his epistles
(Gal.3:16).
As
a result, since the prophets had already foretold of those days; yet they had never mentioned the fact that Uncircumcised Gentiles would one day be sanctified, then we cannot be living in the prophetic times of Acts chapter 3. Instead, we are living in an unprophesied time period which Paul refers to as "the dispensation of the grace of God" (Eph.3:2).
Since Peter's statement in Acts 10:28 proves that he was not referring to Uncircumcised
Gentiles as being included in the promise of Acts 2:39, then neither were Uncircumcised
Gentiles to be included in any of his other early Acts sermons. In fact, Peter's understanding that Christ was a Saviour only to Israel is also reflected by his answer
to the Jewish high priest, in Acts 5:30-32 -
"The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree. Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins. And we are
his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him."
Once again, Peter only understood in the above passage that Christ would give repentance and forgiveness to Israel, if she repented. Peter never intended for Uncircumcised Gentiles to be included in this promise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Share with your friends: