Gangs Aff/Neg

Case ensures more people enter science fields as their professions-- Quality education about science in grade school through high school is critical in order to get people into the fields

Download 0.65 Mb.
Size0.65 Mb.
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18

Case ensures more people enter science fields as their professions-- Quality education about science in grade school through high school is critical in order to get people into the fields

United States Government Accountability Office, Report to the Chairman, Committee on Rules, House of Representatives; Higher education;Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Programs and Related

Trends. October 2005
Educators and others cited several factors as influencing students’ decisions about pursuing STEM degrees and occupations, and they suggested many ways to encourage more participation in STEM fields. Studies, education experts, university officials, and others cited teacher quality at the kindergarten through 12th grade levels and students’ high school preparation in mathematics and science courses as major factors that influence domestic students’ decisions about pursuing STEM degrees and occupations. In addition, university officials, students, and studies identified mentoring as a key factor for women and minorities. Also, according to university officials, education experts, and reports, international students’ decisions about pursuing STEM degrees and occupations in the United States are influenced by yet other factors, including more stringent visa requirements and increased educational opportunities outside the United States. We have reported that several aspects of the visa process have been improved, but further steps could be taken. In order to promote participation in the STEM fields, officials at most of the eight universities visited and current students offered suggestions that focused on four areas: teacher quality, mathematics and science preparation and courses, outreach to underrepresented groups, and the federal role in STEM education. The students who responded to our e-mail survey generally agreed with most of the suggestions and expressed their desires for better mathematics and science preparation for college. However, before adopting such suggestions, it is important to know the extent to which existing STEM education programs are appropriately targeted and making the best use of available federal resources.

Education- Impact (Science Literacy- Competitiveness Impact Scenario)

Science literacy is critical to ensure US competitiveness

Gentry Lee, columist. Science Literacy, August 4, 2000.

There are other reasons why our society would benefit immensely from a commitment to a major increase in science literacy. In the new global civilization, there is ample evidence that competence in scientific and technological disciplines will be a key parameter in distinguishing between those nations and societies that achieve and/or sustain economic health and those that do not. Most of the new jobs of the 21st century will be in fields that are related to science and technology. Having most of our work force at least not uncomfortable with top-level scientific concepts will clearly strengthen our ability to compete in the global marketplace.

Competitiveness is critical to hegemony

Zalmay Khalilzad. Losing the Moment? The United States and the World After the Cold War, The Washington Quarterly. 1995

The United States is unlikely to preserve its military and technological dominance if the U.S. economy declines seriously. In such an environment, the domestic economic and political base for global leadership would diminish and the United States would probably incrementally withdraw from the world, become inward-looking, and abandon more and more of its external interests. As the United States weakened, others would try to fill the Vacuum.

US Hegemony prevents nuclear war

Zalmay Khalilzad. Losing the Moment? The United States and the World After the Cold War, The Washington Quarterly. 1995

Under the third option, the United States would seek to retain global leadership and to preclude the rise of a global rival or a return to multipolarity for the indefinite future. On balance, this is the best long-term guiding principle and vision. Such a vision is desirable not as an end in itself, but because a world in which the United States exercises leadership would have tremendous advantages. First, the global environment would be more open and more receptive to American values -- democracy, free markets, and the rule of law. Second, such a world would have a better chance of dealing cooperatively with the world's major problems, such as nuclear proliferation, threats of regional hegemony by renegade states, and low-level conflicts. Finally, U.S. leadership would help preclude the rise of another hostile global rival, enabling the United States and the world to avoid another global cold or hot war and all the attendant dangers, including a global nuclear exchange. U.S. leadership would therefore be more conducive to global stability than a bipolar or a multipolar balance of power system.

Adv # Economy

Urban revitalization requires ridding neighborhoods of gangs—otherwise decay creeps outwards

JIM BOWERS, Candidate Northeast City Council District. Stepping Up for the Northeast!; BECAUSE EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD COUNTS, August 20, 2007 accessed June 7, 2009

While the worst of such activity is concentrated into well defined and known high-risk areas, “creep” is occurring into other neighborhoods once considered stable and safe. Residents in the Northland-Lyceum neighborhood report recent changes that include increased vandalism and property crimes, the appearance of gang-like activities, and shots fired. These reported changes appear to have developed particularly after the closing of the Goodman Section Police Substation. In addition, nearly all neighborhoods in the Northeast District now have documented gang problems, seen in the explosion of gang related graffiti through the City’s Northeast. While Rochester may be a single legal entity with a common history, the troubles found within the neighborhoods of City’s Northeast highlight that Rochester is divided socially, economically, culturally, and politically. Rallying cries claiming there to be but “One Rochester,” regardless of how well intended, cannot deny this reality. Symbolism cannot mask that Rochester’s assets and advantages are not accessible to all. Nor does it appear that city government decision making is conducted regularly to maximize the value-added for the persons who reside, work, and run local businesses in the City. Instead, deficient attention to the well being of all city residents and neighborhoods is reflected in the City’s flirtation with buying Midtown Plaza, the ill-conceived decisions lifting the cap on the number of vacant properties a single purchaser can buy at City auctions, and public comments of a high level city official writing off the entire 14621 area as unsuitable for new market rate housing. It would appear as if City leaders have forgotten that every neighborhood counts. Acting and believing so contributes to the continued damaging divisions to Rochester, divisions that keep us from being truly one city. “One Rochester” remains a dream that must be brought into reality. It remains an ideal in need of New Urban Leadership and a New Urban Revival. We cannot truly claim that there is “One Rochester” until we have achieved the following for all city neighborhoods and those who live, work, and own businesses in them: 􀀁 Neighborhoods that are all places of choice 􀀁 Affordable and well-maintained housing opportunities 􀀁 A solid foundation of homeownership 􀀁 Thriving business districts 􀀁 Safe and secure places to live, work, and play 􀀁 Civically engaged and empowered residents who celebrate their rich diversity. To accomplish these goals and to make the Northeast City Council District fully a part of “One Rochester” a new leader stepping up for the City’s Northeast is needed. This stepping up must embrace the twin elements of New Urban Leadership and New Urban Revival that puts residents, locally owned city businesses, and others who contribute daily to the city’s pulse first. With your support and vote, I will be that new leader stepping up for the City’s Northeast . I am prepared to step up for you because every neighborhoods count! New Urban Leadership New Urban Leadership is my blueprint for how, as your district councilperson, I intend to serve you. It consists of four equal parts--listening, responding, following, and leading. Specifically, New Urban Leadership: 1. Is a resident-centered commitment to representation that obligates me as your district councilperson to emphasize the desires, needs, and views of neighborhood residents, business owners, and other indistrict constituencies first 2. Requires me to serve and put the best interests of the district community – our neighborhoods, neighbors and businesses – first; not serve the interests of political party, political bosses, or other outside special interests 3. Mandates that I work to minimize negative impacts to the district’s residents, businesses, and community organizations in situations such as fiscal crises where City interests may need to prevail 4. Demands I be an ombudsman and champion for district residents, businesses, and community organizations rather than outside interests 5. Necessitates that I be a mediator, conciliator, and problem solver for and among the district’s neighborhood, business, and community groups 6. Obligates me to be present and accessible to all district residents, local business owners (including those for whom English is a second language), and community organizations 7. Mandates that I remain dedicated to New Urban Leadership and serve in office only so long as I am effective in this role In keeping with New Urban Leadership I will: 1. Appoint a Northeast District Advisory Committee to further learn and effectively represent your interests that will consist of neighborhood residents, business owners, landlords, and community group members 2. Use the Advisory Committee to build bridges and reconcile differences among the various stakeholders throughout the Northeast District 3. Be a district ombudsman for you with City Hall 4. Hold weekly office hours directly in the district where either my council staff assistant or I will be available to listen to and discuss your issues and concerns 5. Regularly walk the district neighborhoods with residents, business owners, and community organization representatives 6. Put forth a serious effort to recruit and hire a multi-lingual council staff assistant 7. Make an effort to become conversationally bi-lingual before the completion of my first term 8. Be accessible and have a presence at as many neighborhood meetings and events as scheduling permits. A New Urban Revival New Urban Revival is my blueprint for urban revitalization emphasizing that city residents and locally owned and operated businesses in particular must be the chief beneficiaries of economic and community development initiatives. Specifically, New Urban Revival: 1. Is a resident-centered commitment and approach to urban revitalization 2. Is committed to improving the quality of city life and opportunities for the poor, working-poor, working class, and middle class that are the foundation for residential growth and stability 3. Accepts that Rochester’s vitality depends upon the well-being and revitalizations of all of its unique neighborhoods 4. Views downtown Rochester as a neighborhood of no greater or lesser importance or value than other neighborhoods 5. Requires that downtown and neighborhood development be of equal importance and treated as equal components of urban revitalization 6. Recognizes that all neighborhoods must be accessible, affordable, and desirable choices for all residents to live, work, and play 7. Embraces that all neighborhoods have their own unique combinations of assets and strengths that must be celebrated and built upon, including cultural and ethnic diversity, unique residential choices, and economic opportunities 8. Understands that complete urban revitalization includes ensuring public safety, providing high quality public schools, and having civically engaged and empowered residents

Urban Revitalization Ensures Economic Growth

Tatsuo Hatta, PhD in Economics and Proffessor at John Hopkins University, December 2001

“Economic Recovery Through Urban Revitalization”, Global Communications Platform Accessed 7/9/2009

First, it is desirable in the short run as well as in the long run to adopt a policy of undertaking useful public investment by mobilizing idle resources in time of recession, when investments in the public facilities that are necessary anyway would not increase tax burdens in the future. Some of those investments could even raise tax revenue. For example, public infrastructure investment in urban areas tends to induce private investment and push up land values, leading to increases in property taxes and income taxes. Issuing government bonds to finance useful public investment is likely to raise expectations for economic recovery and even improve the ratings of government bonds.

Second, higher land values as a result of improved amenities and land productivity in big cities could solve the bad loan problem, which is concentrated in large urban areas. The hasty disposition of bad loans might well aggravate the recession. Instead, we should try to raise land values by deregulation and public investment and thereby turn bad loans to healthy ones for revitalization of the private economy.

Economic Collapse causes extinction

Lt Col. Beardon, PhD, 2000 Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden (retd.) PhD, MS (nuclear engineering), BS (mathematics - minor electronic engineering) Co-inventor - the 2002 Motionless Electromagnetic Generator - a replicated overunity EM generator Listed in Marquis' Who'sWho in America, 2004 The Tom Bearden Website From: Tom Bearden To: (Correspondent) Subj: Zero-Point Energy Date: Original Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:36:29 -0500 Modified and somewhat updated Dec. 29, 2000.

Just prior to the terrible collapse of the World economy, with the crumbling well underway and rising, it is inevitable that some of the weapons of mass destruction will be used by one or more nations on others. An interesting result then—as all the old strategic studies used to show—is that everyone will fire everything as fast as possible against their perceived enemies. The reason is simple: When the mass destruction weapons are unleashed at all, the only chance a nation has to survive is to desperately try to destroy its perceived enemies before they destroy it. So there will erupt a spasmodic unleashing of the long range missiles, nuclear arsenals, and biological warfare arsenals of the nations as they feel the economic collapse, poverty, death, misery, etc. a bit earlier. The ensuing holocaust is certain to immediately draw in the major nations also, and literally a hell on earth will result. In short, we will get the great Armageddon we have been fearing since the advent of the nuclear genie. Right now, my personal estimate is that we have about a 99% chance of that scenario or some modified version of it, resulting.

Download 0.65 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18

The database is protected by copyright © 2023
send message

    Main page