a. Acts must be such as will constitute reasonable notice to the owner that she is claiming dominion, so that the owner can defend his rights.
b. Generally, open and nototious acts are those that look like typical acts of an owner of property; they are acts from which the community, observing them, would infer the actor to be claiming ownership
c. Obviously, the type of act required turns on the type of land involved. The acts must be appropriate to the condition, size and locality of the land.
i. the totality of the acts must give a picture of someone claiming dominion
i. hunting cabin on undeveloped land
ii. erection of a building or fence in the city
iii. fencing, cultivating or building on farm land
2. Statutory requirements?
a. some states have specific statutes that require specific kinds of acts for adverse possession
i. color of title?
3. Possession of property underground?
i. if the same person owns both the surface estate and the mineral rights when adverse possession begins, adverse possession of the surface includes possession of the minerals
ii. If a separate person owns the minerals then possession of the surface does not give possession to the minerals. Possession of the surface does not give a cause of action to the separate owner of minerals until the minerals are disturbed
i. Possession of a cave under the surface owner's land of which the owner is unaware, does not establish adverse possession because it is not open and notorious
F. Adverse and under a claim of right?
1. Objective test?
a. state of mind of the adverse possessor is not very important; waht is important are the actions of the adverse possessor
b. the possessor's actions, including statements, must look like they are claims of ownership. If they look that way to the community, the claim is adverse and under a claim of right.
c. a person can be an adverse possessor even though he is not actually claiming title against the true owner. The important thing is that he is occupying the land without the permission of the owner.
d. person's stated intent does not matter -- look at what he is doing
2. Subjective test
a. a claim of right means that the adverse possessor must have a bona fide or good faith belief that he has title. If the possessor knows he has no title, and that someone else has title, his possession in not adverse.
b. Criticism of the subjective test?
i. It ignores the fact that the owner can bring an action in ejectment against the possessor
ii. It does not take into account the attachment a possessor acquires through time
iii. It does not reward the occupant who has used the land in a productive way.
3. Color of title?
a. refers to a cliam founded on a written instrument or a judgment or decree which, unknown to the claimant, is defective and invalid.
b. where a person enters with color of title, no further claim of title or proof of adversity is required.
c. important under constructive adverse possession -- infra
4. boundary disputes
a. Objective test -- majority view
i. the possessor is necessarily holdin gunder a claim of right if his actions appear to the community to be a claim or ownership and if he is not holding with permission of the owner
b. The Maine doctrine
i. if the possessor is mistaken as to the boundary and would not have occupid or claimed the land if he had known the mistake, the possessor has no intention to claim title and adversity is missing
a) if actual intent is determinative, the intentional wrongdoer wins and the good neighbor does not
b) it encourages honest neighbors to lie on the stand
c) objective test is cheaper and easier to administer
c. special situations: whether the possessor is holding adversely or permissively:
i. Constructive adverse possession does not apply if someone else is in actual possession of any portion of the land at the time of the adverse possessor's entry
ii. The adverse possessor is limited to the portion he actually occupies
iii. Similarly, if a prior adverse possessor with color of title to the whole is occupying some portion his prior constructive possession of the whole will prevent constructive possession by a second adverse possessor