international transactions
It is featured in the UCC,
85
Vienna Sales Convention the EC Directive on Self-Employed Commercial Agents and Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts,
88
the UNCITRAL Convention and the UNIDROIT Conventions on International Factoring and International Financial Leasing as well as in the UNIDROIT Principles for International Commercial Contracts and the separate Principles of European Contract Law issued by the Commission on European Contract Law.
93
In the US, the UCC emphasises the concept of good faith to resolve confrontations between parties to commercial transactions, and is frequently elaborated in the context of Articles 2, 9 and 7, and explicitly mentioned in §5-109. In contrast to US law, English law does not yet possess any clear concept of good faith in contracts as traditionally courts have been wary of open-textured concepts and the degree of unpredictability that they represent. This was despite a bold attempt by Lord Mansfield
to introduce the concept, which was subsequently limited to insurance contracts It is likely that this aversion will dissipate as the courts become accustomed to applying the EC
84
H. Veytia, The Requirement of Justice and Equity in Contracts, April, 1995, 69
Tul.L. Rev. 1191, at 1199.
85
Article 1-203, UCC.
86
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, Article 7(1).
87
Council Directive 86/653, Artis 3(1), 4(1), 1986 OJ. (L 382) 17.
88
Council Directive 93/13, Artis 3(1), 1993 OJ. Lat Articles 5, 19.
90
Article 4(1).
91
Article 6(1).
92
Article 1.7(1), 1994.
93
Article 1.106(1).
94
Carter v Boehm, 97 Eng. Rep. 1162, 1164 (KB. 1766).
95
Goode, (1996), op. cit. at 10.
Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts.
95
Certain cases in Australia have suggested the existence of good faith. In 1896, Griffith CJ in the Supreme Court of Queensland stated a principle — the duty to cooperate — that could approximate the principle of good faith Justice Finn in the Federal Court of Australia following the earlier decision
of Justice Priestly in Renard Constructions Ltd v. Minister for Public Works,
98
also concluded that such a duty existed in Australia. Mugasha reports that the UCC has been a major source of inspiration for Australian courts, tribunals and academics in the trend toward implying the duty of good faith The content of the obligation,
though vague, is practically, to do the right thing”.
100
The issue of the incorporation of the obligation to exercise obligations in good faith will be further discussed in Chapter 4.
3.4.4 Nature of the documents examined (a) Documents subject to examination The letter of credit has been described
by Burton as follows 96
Butt v. McDonald (1896) 7 Q.L.J. & R. 68, 70-71 as discussed in A. Mugasha, Evolving Standards of Conduct (Fiduciary Duty, Good Faith and Reasonableness) and Commercial Certainty in Multi-Lender Contracts, 2000, 45
Wayne L. Rev. 1789, at.
97
Ibid, citing
Hughs Aircraft Systems International v. Airservices Australia (1997) 146 A.L.R.
1, at 37.
However Justice Gummow in Service Station Association v. Berg Bennett & Share with your friends: