This section examines the use of spend management tools among 3G bill-payers. The extent to which these monitoring credit services are used provides some indication of consumers’ level of awareness of phone usage prior to receiving a bill and the extent to which they engage in behaviours that may prevent an unexpectedly high bill. Chapter 5 explores possible linkages between the use of spend management tools and the incidence of receiving a higher than expected bill.
Just over half of 3G bill-payers use spend management tools, with 47 per cent not using any tools to monitor their mobile usage and costs (Figure 10). The most common tool, used by 18 per cent of 3G bill-payers, was to check usage on the providers’ website. The next most commonly used tools were notification by SMS when nearing credit limit (16 per cent) and checking usage by texting the provider (14 per cent).
A significantly higher proportion of 3G feature users (26 per cent) than non-3G feature users (12 per cent) monitor their usage on the providers’ website (Figure 10). This was also higher among younger age groups, reflecting the higher likelihood of usage of 3G features by younger bill-payers in general. Overall, 3G feature users (63 per cent) were more likely to use spend management tools than non-3G feature users (45 per cent). This may be due to the fact that the non-3G users group uses fewer phone features and has less need to monitor usage. Alternatively, it may reflect a different level of awareness of monitoring tools between the two groups.
Figure 10 Use of tools to monitor usage and costs (%)
Source: D7a. Which of the following, if any, do you use to monitor usage and costs for your mobile? [Multiple responses allowed]
Denotes significantly different at the 95% confidence level, comparison among delineated groups.
4. 3G bill-payers’ understanding of their contracts
This section examines the level of understanding of charging and billing arrangements among 3G customers in Australia. Information is presented on the level of overall understanding of the contract as well as specific aspects of charging and billing arrangements. A further aim is to investigate the level of understanding of different aspects of plans and across different consumer groups.
Findings are presented for fixed-line customers, 3G feature users and non-3G feature users, and parent and adult 3G bill-payers. A detailed analysis of the extent and nature of bill shock, including a breakdown by the level of understanding of the payment plan, is presented in Chapter 6.
Findings in this section provide considerable insights into mobile bill-payers’ understanding of billing and charging arrangements:
Less than one in five 3G bill-payers read the entire contract, while about half read at least half of their contract.
About three-quarters of bill-payers who read at least some of their contract reported that they understood it. Difficult aspects of the contract included language, charging arrangements and the consequences of exceeding the cap.
While 77 per cent of consumers were confident in their understanding of the call and SMS inclusions in their plan, just 56 per cent were confident in their understanding of charging for excess usage.
Among bill-payers who use 3G features, approximately half indicated they had low or no understanding of data-charging arrangements.
Reading the contract
The proportion of people who read at least half of their contract is no higher than 51 per cent, regardless of which target group of mobile bill-payers is considered. When comparing differences across customer groups, 3G feature users (19 per cent) are less likely than non-3G users (14 per cent) to read the contract at all.
Figure 11 3G bill-payers from fixed-line households who read at least half the contract (%)
Base: varies, as above.
Source: B8a. At the time of purchasing your current mobile phone plan, to what extent did you read the contract? Chart shows percentage of those that read at least half the contract.
Denotes significantly different at the 95% confidence level, comparison among delineated groups.
A key objective of this study is to assess the level of understanding of charging and billing arrangements among 3G bill-payers in Australia. Bill-payers were asked to rate their overall level of understanding of the contract they signed on a scale where a choice of zero indicated they did not understand the contract at all and 10 indicated that they understood the contract extremely well. A bill-payer was deemed to understand a contract based on a rating of six or higher on this scale.
Approximately three-quarters of bill-payers across all groups indicated that they had a reasonable or very good understanding of their contract. There was very little variation in the level of understanding between different bill-payer groups.
However, bill-payers were less confident in their understanding of some aspects of billing and charging arrangements. When asked about the parts of the contract that they found most difficult to understand, the language, charging arrangements and consequences of exceeding the cap limit were identified. To compare groups, 13 per cent of adult bill-payers and seven per cent of parent bill-payers identified charging arrangements as the most difficult aspect of the contract to understand.
Source: B8ba. On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is ‘did not understand the contract at all’ and 10 is ‘understood the contract extremely well’, how well did you understand your contract?
Figure 13 Aspects of the contract bill-payers found most difficult to understand (%)