Question: Should the U. S. have Mandatory Voting?



Download 51.84 Kb.
Date05.08.2017
Size51.84 Kb.
#26127
1st Food For Thought Discussion

Question: Should the U.S. have Mandatory Voting?
Directions: Read the background information and arguments in favor of and opposed to mandatory voting, and discuss with at least 1 adult (and maybe your whole family!) Be sure you look at the tables attached with the latest statistics on voting patterns. Decide whether you think Congress should pass a law requiring people of legal age to register and vote in national elections. Record highlights of your lively conversation and turn in to Wendy  by this Friday, October 17.
Background

The U.S. Constitution was written in 1787, just a few years after the Revolutionary War. One of the priorities of the founders was that the people would be the ultimate source of power in the new government, because they had to give their consent through voting. However, one of the main things they worried about was turning over big decisions to an uneducated public who might not have the wisdom to vote wisely. In the early days we didn’t *directly vote for the president or members of the U.S. Senate.

*more on that later!
It may shock you to know that voter turnout in the United States is pretty pathetic. A large number of people who are eligible to vote don’t exercise this basic constitutional right! One idea to turn this trend around is to pass a law requiring U.S. citizens 18 and older to voter; they would face a consequence if they failed to vote in national elections.
In over 20 countries, voters are required to show up at their polling place on election day.

In Australia, those who do not show up are subject to fines although those who were ill or incapable of voting on election day can have their fines waived. This law was passed in 1924. With Australia's compulsory (required) voting system comes additional flexibility for the voter - elections are held on Saturdays, voters who aren’t at home can vote in any state polling place, and voters in remote areas can vote before an election (at pre-poll voting centers) or via mail.

Voter turnout of those registered to vote in Australia was as low as 47% prior to the 1924 law. But in the decades since 1924, voter turnout has risen to 94 to 96 percent. In 1924, Australian officials felt that compulsory voting would eliminate voter apathy (lack of interest). But some Australians strongly disagree with the system. Their reasons are included below.
In countries that require voting, the biggest predictor of those who will vote is whether they voted in the previous election. That may be one reason why the youngest age group (18 – 25) is the least likely to vote, while senior citizens (above 65) are most likely. Income and education also influence voting patterns. (Be sure to look at the tables in the back!)

Arguments used in favor of compulsory voting:


  • Voting is a civic duty comparable to other duties citizens perform (like paying taxes, compulsory education, and jury duty).

  • Parliament (their Congress) reflects more accurately the "will of the electorate."

  • Governments must consider the total electorate in making and carrying out the laws.

  • Candidates can concentrate their campaigning energies on the issues rather than trying to get voters to turn out.

  • The voter isn't compelled to vote for a particular candidate because voting is by secret ballot.


Arguments used against compulsory voting:

  • Some suggest that it is undemocratic to force people to vote and is an infringement of liberty.

  • The "ignorant" and those with little interest in politics are forced to the polls.

  • It may increase the amount of “random” voting by people who feel that they are required to vote by law, but really don’t know who or what to vote for.

  • It may increase the number of illegitimate votes (ballots that aren’t filled in correctly).

  • It may encourage candidates to put most of their energy into “swing” districts and states where fewer people identify with a political party. Regions leaning strongly democratic (blue) or republican (red) might not get as much attention as those that are “toss-ups.”

  • Resources (money and time) must be spent to make sure those who failed to vote have "valid and sufficient" reasons.


Essay by Eric Liu (local author/activist, historian, presidential speech writer)
Mandatory voting would make elections truly valid. “Protecting the integrity of our elections” is the rationale Republicans give for the cynically restrictive voter ID laws they’ve enacted in Pennsylvania and elsewhere. But if we truly cared about the integrity of elections, we should ensure that they reflect the will of all eligible voters.

Second, as William Galston of the Brookings Institution argues, it would temper the polarization of our politics. In today’s electorate, hardcore partisan believers are over-represented; independents and moderates are under-represented. If the full range of voters actually voted, our political leaders, who are exquisitely attuned followers, would go where the votes are: away from the extremes. And they would become more responsive to the younger, poorer and less educated Americans who don’t currently vote.

Third, mandatory voting would prompt more Americans to pay attention to the choices. Those of us who lament the decline of civic knowledge generally focus on the supply side of the equation: more civics education. A mandate would stimulate the demand side, motivating more voters to learn what they were voting on (just as a draft makes the drafted motivated to learn what they’d fight for).

There are many arguments against mandatory voting; each reflects a lack of faith in democracy itself. One says that increasing the number of uninformed voters will lead to worse policymaking. That presumes, however, that policymaking today sets a high-water mark of enlightenment. It also sets up a viciously antidemocratic circle: if you don’t vote you must be stupid and if you are stupid you mustn’t vote.

Another critique claims that requiring the vote devalues it, and that compelled voters will protest by voting carelessly. But in Australia, where voting became compulsory in 1924, that’s been a marginal issue. The existence of a mandate has made voting a meaningful shared national experience. 

Some Republicans will oppose mandatory voting for the reason they now push voter IDs: to win. (Conventional wisdom says the more people who vote, the worse the GOP does). But if a tactic of disenfranchisement and electorate-amputation makes sense for the party (which is debatable), it is terrible for the country. As former director of the Office of Management and Budget Peter Orzsag said, we can’t know what the ultimate partisan impact would be. One day Republicans could benefit.

The most visceral critique is that mandating voting is just un-American. Yet jury duty, the draft, going to school, and taxpaying all have been compulsory without being called communist (OK, three out of four). At issue is what makes something American — and what makes liberty liberty. The Revolution and the framing of the Constitution were not about the right merely to be let alone or to do whatever one pleased. They were about our liberty to govern and represent ourselves. Core to that liberty is electing representatives and voting on public issues.

That is why the best reason for mandatory voting has nothing to do with today’s politics. It’s about redeeming the central promise of American citizenship. Generations marched, fought and died for the right to vote. The least we can do now is treat that right like a responsibility.



The table below shows the number of people who registered to vote (which does not even include all who are eligible!) followed by the number who actually voted.

Year

Voting-Age Population

Voter Registration

Voter Turnout

Turnout of Voting-Age Population

2012

239,405,657

197,828,022

126,000,000

57.5 %

2008

231,229,580

182,578,209

132,618,580

62.3 %

2004

221,256,931

174,862,732

122,294,978

56.7 %

2000

205,815,000

156,421,311

105,586,274

51.3 %

1996

196,511,000

146,211,960

96,456,345

49.1 %

1992

189,529,000

133,821,178

104,405,155

55.1 %

1988

182,778,000

126,379,628

91,594,693

50.1 %

1984

174,466,000

124,150,614

92,652,680

53.1 %

1980

164,597,000

113,043,734

86,515,221

52.6 %

1976

152,309,190

105,037,986

81,555,789

53.6 %

1972

140,776,000

97,328,541

77,718,554

55.2 %

1968

120,328,186

81,658,180

73,211,875

60.8 %

1964

114,090,000

73,715,818

70,644,592

61.9 %

1960

109,159,000

64,833,096

68,838,204

63.1 %

1956

104,273,000

59,394,723

66,683,193

62.4 %

1952

99,494,000

55,839,748

62,609,207

52 %

Note that about 40% of U.S. citizens don’t exercise their right to vote, even when it’s a presidential election! The “mid-term” elections (like 2014) are even lower. In fact, the U.S. ranks 120th out of 169 countries where data on voter turnout is available.

As you can see in the next table, the more income and education a person has, the more likely they are to vote. Because of this, socioeconomic class (which is often tied to race and immigration status) can keep the powerful in power and further marginalize recent immigrants, those with low incomes and people of color. There are complicated reasons for this: laws in some places require photo I.D.s and permanent addresses (which students, homeless people and immigrants may not have). Polling stations may have limited hours, which people who have multiple jobs and children may have a hard time getting to. Sometimes the I.D. required costs money that many people can’t afford.



Census Data from the 2012 Election - The numbers below show the percent (out of 100) in each category who turned out to vote.

Male

69.1

Female

72.8

White

73.5

Black

69.7

Asian

55.3

Hispanic

59.4

Age 18 to 24

58.5

Age 25 to 34

66.4

Age 35 to 44

69.9

Age 45 to 54

73.5

Age 55 to 64

76.6

Age 65 to 74

78.1

Age 75 or older

76.6

Less than high school graduate

50.5

High school graduate

64.1

Some college

75.3

Bachelor’s degree

81.2

Advanced degree

85.8

Income less than $20,000

63.7

$20,000 to $29,999

67.1

$30,000 to $39,999

71.1

$40,000 to $49,999

72.6

$50,000 to $74,999

78.2

$75,000 to $99,999

81.9

$100,000 and over

79.6

Owns home

74.5

Rents home

60.1

Top Reasons Cited for Not Voting




Too busy conflicting schedule

17.5

Illness or disability

14.9

Not interested

13.4

Did not like candidates or campaign issues

12.9

Other

11.3

Out of town

8.8

Don’t know

7

Registration problems

6

Inconvienient polling place

2.7

Transportation problems

2.6

Forgot

2.6

Bad weather

0.2

sgs-mbp13-wendy:private:var:folders:9s:p8777vsx62n0l44c2k4fksz176s0ww:t:temporaryitems:elections_cartoon.jpg

sgs-mbp13-wendy:private:var:folders:9s:p8777vsx62n0l44c2k4fksz176s0ww:t:temporaryitems:allievoting.jpg

sgs-mbp13-wendy:private:var:folders:9s:p8777vsx62n0l44c2k4fksz176s0ww:t:temporaryitems:tumblr_ln3w2c7wob1qj0314o1_500.jpg

Download 51.84 Kb.

Share with your friends:




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page