Zero Point Energy doc
Download 0.97 Mb. View original pdf
|
- Navigate this page:
- 4. "Inertia Wind" Experiment
- ZPOWER CORPORATIONPAGE OF 352 Z ERO P OINT E NERGY
| 3. Generating "Subcosmic Rays" in a Cold Vacuum Chamber Rueda, Haisch, and Cole (1995) predict that the electromagnetic fluctuations in the vacuum will accelerate isolated charged particles to high speeds. The theory predicts energy gains of a proton of the order of 1000 eV per second. This should be easily measured by "releasing" a "cooled" antiproton in a cryogenically cooled electromagnetic trap and measuring how fast it reaches the walls and annihilates. This experiment is ranked third, despite its complexity and cost, because a positive result would "prove" that you can continuously extract unlimited amounts of "free energy" from the vacuum. We know, of course, that nature is not going to let us violate the law of energy conservation, but finding out how nature enforces the energy conservation law will teach us new physics. 4. "Inertia Wind" Experiment Puthoff, in unpublished work that extrapolates from the paper by Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff (1994), predicts that a pair of 40 kg masses rotating in am radius circle at 20 rpm will create an "inertia wind" that will "push" on a sensing mass. He originally predicted the magnitude of the "inertia wind" force would be comparable to the magnitude of the Newtonian force produced by the 40 kg masses. His coauthors are skeptical of the predicted magnitude, and ZP OWER C ORPORATION PAGE OF 352 Z ERO P OINT E NERGY Puthoff is reworking the calculations to obtain a more definitive prediction. This experiment, despite its simplicity and direct relevance, is ranked fourth because, while a positive result will "prove" the theory, a null result will prove nothing. There are also grave doubts that a large effect of this type would have gone unobserved before now. In addition to the ranked experiments, there are two additional experiments that are described in the main body of the report, but which are not recommended for consideration because the Principal Investigator was notable to identify an experimental approach that would be able to carryout the desired measurement at the signal-to-noise levels required. Perhaps someone reading this report can devise an experimental approach that will make a measurement feasible. Download 0.97 Mb. Share with your friends:
|