88.2.1General comments
Industry has implemented a number of initiatives that are aimed at safety and environmental management. The mining and metal extraction industries operate within government and self-regulating initiatives and Codes of Practice for safety and environment protection.
Primary mining industry representative organisations include the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), its state Chambers and the International Commission in Mining and Metals (ICMM). Each organisation has stated that it is committed to sustainable development. International mining industry initiatives include the Global Mining Initiative (GMI), the declaration by the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM, 2002) and the associated Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD) project (IIED, 2002).
Signatories to the Australian Mineral Industry Code for Environmental Management, published by MCA (2000) commit to obligations including:
-
Integration of environmental, social and economic considerations into decision-making and management, consistent with the objectives of sustainable development.
-
Openness, transparency and improved accountability through public environmental reporting and engagement with the community.
-
Compliance with all statutory requirements, as a minimum.
-
A continually improving standard of environmental performance and, through leadership, the pursuit of environmental excellence throughout the Australian minerals industry.
The Australian Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management was formally retired on 1 January 2005 and replaced by Enduring Value - the Australian Minerals Industry Framework for Sustainable Development. The MCA website (MCA, 2006) indicates that Enduring Value:
-
aligns with global industry initiatives, and in particular provides critical guidance on the International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) Sustainable Development Framework Principles and their application at the operational level;
-
builds on the Australian Minerals Industry Code for Environmental Management - the platform for industry's continual improvement in managing environmental issues since its introduction in 1996;
-
provides a vehicle for industry differentiation and leadership, building reputational capital with the community, government and the finance and insurance sectors; and
-
assists the industry to operate in a manner which is attuned to the expectations of the community, and which seeks to maximise the long-term benefits to society that can be achieved through the effective management of Australia's natural resources. (http://www.minerals.org.au/enduringvalue/enduring_value/index.html )
Various Australian and International Codes of Practice and guidance documents regarding the management of cyanide in mining are available. This includes guidance documents described below available from the DRET website (Environment Australia, 1998, 1999e, 2002; EPA 1995a,b), NTDME (1998) and other material produced by Australian states and territories, guidance published by the Minerals Council of Australia (e.g. MCA, 1997), the International Cyanide Management Code for the Manufacture, Transport and Use of Cyanide in the Production of Gold (ICMI, 2006), and publications by the US EPA and other overseas agencies.
88.2.2Sustainable development program for the mining industry
The Australian Government Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism’s (DRET) Best Practice Environmental Management in the Mining Industry (Sustainable Minerals) series originally produced by DEWHA (Environment Australia, 1998, 1999e, 2002; EPA 1995a,b) provided a range of best practice guidance on environmental management in mining. This included a booklet on Cyanide Management (Environment Australia, 1998), which provides guidance for:
-
establishing a cyanide management strategy as part of environmental management;
-
implementing initial and refresher cyanide management training for managers, workers and contractors;
-
establishing well-defined responsibilities for individuals with clear chains of command and effective lines of communication within the mine workforce;
-
instituting safe procedures for cyanide handling, governing transport, storage, containment, use and disposal;
-
integrating a mine's cyanide and water management plans;
-
identifying and implementing appropriate options for reusing, recycling and disposing of residual cyanide from plant operations;
-
conducting regular cyanide audits and revising cyanide management procedures;
-
developing a cyanide occupational and natural environment monitoring program, and supporting this with a sound sampling, analysis and reporting protocol; and
-
establishing carefully considered and regularly practiced emergency procedures.
This series is being replaced over time by DRET under the Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for the Mining Industry, and the Cyanide Management document has been published recently (DRET, 2008) – see also DITR (2006, 2007).
88.2.3Wildlife management at mining operations
Following bird deaths at the TSF at the Northparkes mine in 1995 due to cyanide poisoning (Sinclair et al., 1997), and a Senate referral of a preliminary inquiry relating to ‘the need for governments to work together with industry to avoid the death of wildlife, risk to groundwater and destruction of native vegetation caused by the toxic tailings dams in the gold mining industry’ (Hansard, 1995), the Northern Territory Department of Mines and Energy (NTDME) published the Best practice guidelines for reducing impacts of tailings storage facilities on avian wildlife in the Northern Territory of Australia (NTDME, 1998), following a detailed investigation of bird utilisation of TSFs in the Northern Territory (Donato, 1999).
Internationally, cyanide management and cyanide-related wildlife incidents have also received considerable attention in recent years. The ICMC and associated guidance (ICMI, 2006) are international mining initiatives that provide guidance on protecting wildlife from exposure to cyanide at mine sites. The ICMC proposes to include a system of auditing of individual participating mine sites that use cyanide, which will incorporate wildlife protection monitoring.
88.2.4International Cyanide Management Code (ICMC)
The International cyanide management code for the manufacture, transport, and use of cyanide in the production of gold (ICMI, 2006) was developed by a multi-stakeholder Steering Committee under the guidance of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) and the International Council on Metals and the Environment (ICME). The main impetus for the original workshop to discuss developing this Code was the incident at Baia Mare, Romania on January 30, 2000 (Balkau, 2000; Section 22.3.3). Other parties to the ICMC included the Gold Institute, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the Worldwide Fund (WWF) for Nature. Information about the scope and nature of the Code from the ICMC website (http://www.cyanidecode.org/about_code.php) includes the following:
The Code is a voluntary initiative for the gold mining industry and the producers and transporters of the cyanide used in gold mining. It is intended to complement an operation’s existing regulatory requirements. Compliance with the rules, regulations and laws of the applicable political jurisdiction is necessary; this Code is not intended to contravene such laws.
The Code focuses exclusively on the safe management of cyanide that is produced, transported and used for the recovery of gold, and on cyanidation mill tailings and leach solutions. The Code originally was developed for gold mining operations, and addresses production, transport, storage, and use of cyanide and the decommissioning of cyanide facilities. It also includes requirements related to financial assurance, accident prevention, emergency response, training, public reporting, stakeholder involvement and verification procedures. Cyanide producers and transporters are subject to the applicable portions of the Code identified in their respective Verification Protocols.
It does not address all safety or environmental activities that may be present at gold mining operations such as the design and construction of tailings impoundments or long-term closure and rehabilitation of mining operations.
As it applies to gold mining operations, the Code is comprised of two major elements. The Principles broadly state commitments that signatories make to manage cyanide in a responsible manner. Standards of Practice follow each Principle, identifying the performance goals and objectives that must be met to comply with the Principle. The Principles and Practices applicable to cyanide production and transportation operations are included in their respective Verification Protocols. Operations are certified as being in compliance with the Code upon an independent third-party audit verifying that they meet the Standards of Practice, Production Practice or Transport Practice.
The programs and procedures identified by the Code's Principles and Standards of Practice and in the Cyanide Production and Transportation Verification Protocols for the management of cyanide can be developed separately from other programs, or they can be integrated into a site’s overall safety, health and environmental management programs. Since operations typically do not have direct control over all phases of cyanide production, transport or handling, gold mines that are undergoing Verification Audits for certification under the Code will need to require that other entities involved in these activities and that are not themselves Code signatories commit to and demonstrate that they adhere to the Code’s Principles and meet its Standards of Practice for these activities.
Thus the primary objective of the ICMC is to improve the management of cyanide used in gold mining world wide and assist in the protection of human health and the reduction of environmental impacts. As the gold mining industry is the predominant user of sodium cyanide in Australia, the ICMC is of particular relevance to the sodium cyanide industry in Australia. The ICMC is a voluntary program for the industry. While not all gold mining operations will attain or seek full code compliance, the code establishes current industry best practice. It is an excellent initiative to lift international standards and demonstrate the environmental commitment of an operator, complementing state/territory legislative requirements.
Mining companies that adopt the ICMC nominate the operations that use cyanide to recover gold that they wish to have certified. These must be audited by an independent third party to determine the status of Code implementation. Those operations that meet the ICMC requirements can be certified. A unique trademark symbol can then be utilised by the certified operation, which is intended to demonstrate environmental responsibility. Audit reports are made public to inform stakeholders of the status of cyanide management practices at the certified operation. Current signatories to the code and audit reports on certified operations are listed on the ICMC website (http://www.cyanidecode.org/signatorycompanies.php). Mines, transport operations and production facilities in Australia have been among the earliest formal adopters of the ICMC worldwide.
The MCA advises that about 65% of the gold produced in Australia is now produced by mines engaged in the Code process. In Australia, a total of 14 gold operation sites (five companies) are listed as signatories and 11 sites had been fully certified as of 27 November 2009, plus both manufacturers and one transporter (MCA, 2009 – updated via the ICMC website). Comparison with the total number of gold mines operating in Australia (Section 5.2.2) suggests that while large producers are evidently involved, many mines are not yet engaged formally in this voluntary ICMC process. Progress in adoption of the ICMC is occurring, and the ICMC provides valuable guidance and a formal means of evaluating the adequacy of environmental protection measures at individual sites.
However, existing voluntary measures are not adequate to ensure environmental safety for all mines where sodium cyanide is used in Australia. Therefore, additional measures are warranted.
Share with your friends: |