1 Background 4 Objectives and coverage 4



Download 325.19 Kb.
Page7/17
Date02.02.2017
Size325.19 Kb.
#15926
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   17

3.2 Impact on air quality


In spite of the abovementioned difficulties, and aiming at identifying areas where air pollution is mainly attributable to biomass burning, trends in PM2.5 and BaP emissions and pollutant concentrations in ambient air were assessed (since 2006 and 2007, respectively). BaP showed a decreasing trend at two thirds of the rural and urban stations having a consistent time series over 2007-2014, and at 22% of these stations this downward trend was statistically significant. The expected increase in BaP concentrations in countries showing a clear increase in BaP emissions (Romania, Hungary, Croatia, Lithuania) or in the use of biomass (Norway, Austria, Denmark, Bulgaria) is not confirmed by the monitoring data except for Lithuania where 2 out of 5 stations have a significant upward trend. For the remaining listed countries either no long time series are available or a downward, generally not-significant, tendency is observed. It might be that trends related to changes in national emissions are obscured by changes in the transboundary contributions. PM2.5 levels showed statistically significant downward trends in about one third of the available stations (49 of 159 urban and rural background stations). The small proportion of significant trends may be linked to: (i) low data availability (only 6 years); (ii) high uncertainty in the observations; (iii) the magnitude of the trends, which are small and difficult to detect statistically, especially when compared to the large variations induced by the year-to-year meteorological variability. In summary it may be concluded that, based only on the measurement data stored at the EEA air quality database, it is not possible to define areas where air pollution is mainly attributable to residential combustion.

To overcome this, a non-exhaustive literature review was carried out aiming to quantitatively assess the contribution from residential combustion to concentrations of ambient pollutants, using receptor, tracer and dispersion modelling tools (ETC/ACM, 2016a). Results evidenced that residential combustion of wood has an impact on local and regional-scale air quality (quantified for PM10, PM2.5, organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), and black carbon (BC)). Contributions from residential wood combustion to PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations during the winter range from <5% to up to 40% of daily means. The highest winter contributions are reported in the Alpine Valleys, the Po Valley, Oslo, Zurich, and rural areas in Austria and Germany. As expected, the lowest contributions are reported for Southern European regions (e.g., Barcelona). Several studies carried out in urban areas (e.g., Vienna, Berlin, Zurich) report that the PM10 or PM2.5 from residential combustion originates mainly from regional-scale transport, and that only a minor proportion is emitted locally.

The data available for OC, EC, or BC are scarcer than for PM, but still representative for their respective study areas. In regions such as Lombardy (Italy) or Zurich (Switzerland), wood combustion contributed with around 25-35% to ambient EC mass concentration. Furthermore, wood combustion contributes up to 50% of OC mass concentration during the winter heating period and especially in central Europe (Austria, Po Valley) (ETC/ACM, 2016a, and references therein).

3.3 Mitigating emissions from residential wood combustion


There are three main reasons for the relatively high air pollutant emissions from residential wood combustion:

  1. the use of non-regulated stoves,

  2. the inadequate maintenance of old or new stoves installed in homes, and/or

  3. the use of non-standardised fuels (including treated, painted or not sufficiently dried wood, or even agricultural waste) generate persistent organic pollutant (POP) and metal emissions, as well as hinder an efficient combustion (AIRUSE, 2015; Viana et al., 2013; Kubica et al., 2007).

The replacement of old wood stoves with modern biomass stoves (particularly pellet stoves; Nussbaumer, 2010) with higher efficiency and lower emissions would contribute to a reduction of emissions from residential biomass combustion. These modern stoves, currently available on the European market, meet criteria set by eco-labelling initiatives (see e.g. Nordic Ecolabel, 2014). Unfortunately, the replacement of stoves is often slow, as they have a log lifetime. With regard to the fuels, it is imperative that untreated and dry biomass is used, preferably harvested close to the place of consumption (AIRUSE, 2015; Viana et al., 2013). Proper and frequent stove maintenance is paramount to ensure minimal emission of harmful air pollutants.

Still, combustion of dry untreated biomass in new ovens and under appropriate operating conditions may lead to higher emissions of PM and PAHs than residential combustion of gas or oil, which are fossil fuels with higher CO2 emissions (Tønnesen and Høiskar, 2013). A possible way of avoiding a massive substitution of gas and oil burners with biomass stoves in urban areas, and the associated negative impacts on air quality and health, would be the use of biomass in district heating. The use of electrostatic precipitators in biomass boilers may decrease particle emissions to the same level or even lower as in heavy fuel-oil combustion, even if fuel-oil emits larger particle number concentrations of smaller particles (Sippula et al., 2009). Other possible mitigation measures are presented in box 3.2.


Box 3.2 Mitigation of air pollutant emissions from wood burning

At EU level

The Ecodesign Directive (EU, 2009b) provides EU-wide rules for improving the environmental performance of energy related products through eco-design. It refers to energy-using products, that is, products which use, generate, transfer or measure energy (e.g., boilers), as well as to other energy related products which do not use energy but have an impact on energy. Its aim is to transition towards better (more efficient, lower emissions) stoves and boilers over the next decade.

The Directive on the on the energy performance of buildings (EU, 2010b), though not targeting specifically wood burning, promotes the improvement of the energy performance of buildings within the Union, in order to reduce energy consumption for heating.

At national level

National regulations for small combustion installations vary widely in terms of which and how strictly emissions are regulated or to which product types regulations apply. Almost all of them include only type testing requirements for new products to be put on the market, but no requirements for existing installations. So far, Germany is the only country in Europe with a regulation that controls explicitly the emissions of existing small combustion installations.

Some countries have set up labelling schemes in order to promote small biomass solid fuel combustion technology development through voluntary labelling, mostly with a focus on thermal efficiency. Existing labels include the “Umweltzeichen 37” (Austria) for wood/pellet-fired heaters, “Flamme Verte” (France), the “Blue Angel” (Germany) for pellet stoves and pellet boilers, “DINplus” marking for room heaters and inserts (Germany), the “sign for ecological safety” for boilers (Poland), and “P-marking” (Sweden). Transnational labelling schemes include the “Nordic Swan” for slow heat release, stove and insert appliances (Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway) or the label of the European Fireplace Association (EFA), which may be applied to solid fuel heaters all over Europe.


At local level:

Local scale strategies focus mainly on providing guidance on the best usage and maintenance of stoves. Recommendations and incentives to promote the replacement of old stoves and the use of recommended fuels are provided by e.g., the UK DEFRA or the Madrid (Spain) regional government (www.cambiatucaldera.com), and several Norwegian municipalities (ETC/ACM, 2016a).

Bans or restrictions on solid fuel combustion in households in certain areas or periods of time (e.g., during strong air stagnation events) are also implemented (e.g. Malmø) or contemplated.


Download 325.19 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   ...   17




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page