AUSTRALIAN RETAIL CREDIT ASSOCIATION LIMITED (ACRA) - AUTHORISATION - A91482
On 3 December 2015 the ACCC granted an authorisation to the ARCA as well as current and future signatories of the Principles of Reciprocity and Data Exchange (the Principles) for a period of five years. This was in relation to the reciprocity, consistency and enforceability provisions contained in the Principles.
ARCA is the industry association for organisations involved in the provision, exchange and application of retail credit reporting data in Australia. For example, when a consumer applies to a credit provider for a loan, the credit provider will typically request a report about the individual’s credit worthiness from a credit reporting body. ARCA’s members include credit providers, such as banks and credit reporting bodies.
ARCA developed the Principles as a system for exchanging comprehensive consumer credit information, following amendments to the Privacy Act 1988 which allows both positive and negative consumer credit information to be collected and exchanged.
In its determination, the ACCC accepted that there are significant benefits arising from improving the information available to credit providers to assist them in making more informed credit decisions. This should lead to increased competition between credit providers together with greater access to credit for consumers and the avoidance of consumer over-indebtedness.
The ACCC considered that the reciprocity, consistency and enforceability provisions in the Principles would assist with the realisation of benefits associated with comprehensive credit reporting. The ACCC accepted that credit providers need adequate assurance in a framework for sharing their commercially valuable consumer credit information in order to participate in comprehensive credit reporting to address the free rider concern. The reciprocity provisions combined with the enforceability provisions are likely to provide the requisite assurance and improve incentives for participation.
The ACCC considered that the consistency provisions were likely to facilitate a more complete exchange of consumer credit information between credit providers and each credit reporting body. This is likely to promote competition between credit reporting bodies, between credit providers and lower the cost for credit providers to comply with their responsible lending obligations. A more standardised system for the exchange of Comprehensive Reporting should bring benefits in terms of lower cost for the industry.
The ACCC also accepted that there are some potential public detriments arising from the costs imposed by the relevant provisions of the Principles, most notably as a result of the consistency provisions. However the ACCC considered that each credit provider would make a commercial decision whether or not to provide and consume data from multiple credit reporting bodies, based on their estimates of the associated costs and benefits. The ACCC also noted the concerns raised in relation to the recording of financial hardship arrangements and settlement of defaults, but concluded this should be co-ordinated by industry and relevant regulators outside of the authorisation process.
Overall the ACCC was satisfied that in all the circumstances the proposed conduct was likely to result in public benefits that would outweigh the likely public detriments.
|