Abstract This research paper aims to explore two distinct yet interrelated areas of study: language acquisition theories and methods of teaching foreign languages
Download 155.5 Kb.
|
| 2. Innatism Theory
Innatism is a language acquisition theory that posits that humans have an innate predisposition for language acquisition. This theory, associated with the work of linguist Noam Chomsky, challenges behaviorist accounts by emphasizing the role of internal cognitive structures and mechanisms in language development. Innatism suggests that children are born with innate linguistic knowledge and principles that guide their language acquisition process. Key Concepts of Innatism Theory: Innatism proposes several key concepts and principles that are central to understanding language acquisition: 1. Universal Grammar: One of the central tenets of innatism is the concept of Universal Grammar (UG). Universal Grammar refers to a set of underlying linguistic principles and structures that are common to all languages. According to Chomsky, children are born with an innate knowledge of these universal linguistic features, which serve as a foundation for language acquisition. 2. Language Acquisition Device (LAD): The Language Acquisition Device (LAD) is a cognitive mechanism proposed by Chomsky as part of the innatism theory. The LAD is believed to be a specialized module within the human brain that is dedicated to language acquisition. It enables children to acquire language effortlessly and rapidly by providing them with the necessary cognitive structures and principles. 3. Poverty of the Stimulus: Innatism argues that the input children receive from their environment is not sufficient to account for the complexity and speed of language acquisition. Chomsky proposed the concept of "poverty of the stimulus," suggesting that the linguistic input available to children is limited and ambiguous. Despite this, children are still able to acquire language with relative ease, which suggests the presence of innate knowledge guiding the process. Empirical Evidence and Support for Innatism: Several lines of empirical evidence support the innatism theory of language acquisition: 1. Language Universals: Cross-linguistic studies have revealed that there are certain universal linguistic structures and principles that are found across languages. These universals suggest the existence of innate linguistic knowledge that guides language acquisition. 2. Language Development Patterns: Children show similar patterns of language development across different languages, regardless of their linguistic input. This consistency in language development milestones, such as babbling, one-word stage, and grammatical development, supports the notion of innate language knowledge. 3. Language Errors: Children often produce language errors that reflect underlying grammatical rules rather than simple imitation of incorrect language input. These errors, known as "developmental errors," suggest the influence of innate linguistic structures and principles. Critiques and Challenges to Innatism: Despite the support for innatism, there have been criticisms and challenges to this theory: 1. Lack of Specific Mechanisms: Innatism has been criticized for not providing specific details about the nature of the innate mechanisms or how they operate in language acquisition. Critics argue that the theory lacks concrete explanations of the processes through which innate knowledge is utilized during language learning. 2. Role of Experience: Innatism places significant emphasis on innate knowledge, but it has been argued that language experience and input also play a crucial role in shaping language acquisition. The interaction between innate knowledge and environmental input is considered essential for successful language development. 3. Individual and Cross-Linguistic Differences: Innatism does not fully explain the variations and individual differences observed in language acquisition. The theory focuses on the universality of linguistic structures but does not account for the diversity and variability across different languages and individual learners. Implications for Applied Linguistics: Innatism has implications for applied linguistics and language teaching: 1. Grammar Instruction: Innatism highlights the importance of explicit instruction and focus on grammatical structures in language teaching. Recognizing the innate knowledge that learners possess can inform the design of grammar instruction materials and activities. 2. Language Assessment: Understanding the role of innate knowledge in language acquisition can influence language assessment practices. It allows for a consideration of learners' underlying linguistic competence when evaluating language proficiency. 3. Language Curriculum Design: Innatism supports a focus on linguistic structures and principles in language curricula. Recognizing the presence of innate knowledge can guide the sequencing and organization of language instruction to align with learners' natural language development. In conclusion, innatism proposes that humans have an innate predisposition for language acquisition, with Universal Grammar and the Language Acquisition Device playing crucial roles. While innatism has faced critiques and challenges, it provides valuable insights into the innate knowledge and cognitive mechanisms involved in language acquisition. Understanding innatism contributes to the development of effective language teaching methodologies and informs language assessment practices in applied linguistics. Download 155.5 Kb. Share with your friends:
|