Whilst operating the wind tunnel a lab coat had to be worn, however, eye protection was not necessary as there were no moving parts in the experimental apparatus. Before the wind tunnel could be operated it was essential to clean and clear any loose objects in the test section that may be blown into the wind tunnel.
To avoid any possibility of blowing the fuses in the wind tunnel’s circuitry, both the ‘coarse’ and ‘fine’ velocity control dials were always set to zero before starting up the wind tunnel.
To power up the wind tunnel the lever on the motor located behind the fan was pulled fully back and held. The lever was held in this position until the motor speed levelled out, at which point the lever was sharply pushed forward and released. With the motor up and running, the wind speed could then be adjusted accordingly.
To raise the air speed in the tunnel the coarse dial was turned in the clockwise direction whilst using the velocity indicator situated behind the test section as an indication of wind speed. Attention also had to be paid to the ammeter located next to the wind speed indicator as it was recommended that the wind tunnel should not be operated at levels exceeding 50 amperes, to minimise the risk of burning out the fuses in the circuits. To verify the wind speed in the tunnel, readings were taken from a manometer that was connected to a Pitot tube located at the mouth of the wind tunnel. These readings were then input into a pre-made spreadsheet along with the lab air temperature and atmospheric pressure and the spreadsheet then produced the true air speed.
The first step in the testing process was to use the data acquisition system to determine the voltage output from the strain gauge with the tunnel air speed set at nil. From there, the air speed was then increased in increments of 10mph up to a speed of 60mph, with the voltage readings being taken at each point. This procedure was repeated several times to obtain enough data to assess the consistency of the outputs.
With all the necessary result obtained, the speed dials were both set to zero and the stop button on the motor was pushed, which shut down the wind tunnel.
8. CFD – WING MIRROR ON FLAT PLATE 8.1 GAMBIT: MODELLING
The pre-processing software package used for the wing mirror model was Gambit version 2.4.6. The purpose of using this software was to take the wing mirror geometry and place it in a virtual wind tunnel, this model (or mesh) could then be exported into the CFD package.
To create this virtual wind tunnel the most commonly applied approach is to:
import the model geometry, which can come in various formats from several software types;
create a real volume of suitable dimensions around the imported model geometry;
subtract the model geometry from this brick geometry, thus leaving one volume which will represent the flow domain;
apply geometry clean-up measures to the geometry, to reduce any complexities in the model that could represent problems when meshing;
mesh all the faces in the model including the domain walls;
mesh the volume of the model;
set the boundary conditions and the continuum type;
export the final mesh for use in a CFD package.
For the purpose of this project, the wing mirror geometry of the L319 wing mirror was provided in ‘dbs.’ format which was a suitable format to open in Gambit directly. With the geometry loaded in Gambit, the model was examined for any noticeable differences between it and the real wing mirror provided. It was recognised that the wing mirror computer geometry consisted of two ‘real’ volumes, one representing the wing mirror mount and the other representing the wing mirror casing. This was concurrent with the real wing mirror as it consisted of these two components hinged together. Upon further inspection, it was also noticed that on the underside of the wing mirror casing model there was a recess in the surface, no such featured existed on the real wing mirror.
To fix this discrepancy, a ‘real’ face was created over the recess, essentially closing it in. This enclosed region was then transformed into a real volume using the ‘stitch faces’ command, and the resultant volume was then merged into the rest of the wing mirror casing using the ‘merge volumes’ command. These operations resulted in a flat surface over the area in which the recess was found (Figure 11).
Figure 11 - Recess Filling
With this discrepancy resolved, the model was then deemed an accurate virtual representation of the actual wing mirror.
The next step was to create the volume around the wing mirror geometry from which the wing mirror geometry would then be extracted. This was carried out by using the ‘create real brick’ command, and entering the values of length, height and width as 4000x1500x1500mm respectively (a rough approximation of the wind tunnel test section). This volume was then aligned (using the ‘move/align’ function) with the wing mirror base, with the wing mirror centrally positioned on one of the 4000x1500mm faces of the brick.
With all the volumes in their desired position, the volume subtraction could then be performed. The first volume subtracted was that of the wing mirror mount, Gambit performed this ‘subtract volume’ operation successfully and as a result created a new volume which represented the brick volume with a cavity in the form of the wing mirror mount. However, when attempting to subtract the wing mirror housing from this newly formed volume, an error message of ‘coincident face_face_ints with different body vertices’ was displayed. This problem arose because around the area where the wing mirror casing and mount are hinged, some of the faces on each volume were coincident or overlapping. To rectify this issue, the wing mirror casing volume was moved away from the mount by a few millimetres on each axis to prevent face overlapping or coincidence. The volume subtract operation was then tried again and was successful, thus the desired single volume was created.
With the flow volume defined the geometry could then be ‘cleaned’. This process consisted of eliminating any sharp angles or short edges on the geometry and merging small faces together to reduce the complexity of the model. To eliminate short edges on the model, the ‘connect edges’ tool was used to highlight the shortest edge present in the geometry and this was consequently merged with its neighbouring edge to form a larger edge. This process was repeated until the shortest edge highlighted was no longer judged too short to cause meshing problems. The ‘merge faces’ tool was then used to merge any small or awkward shaped faces into its neighbouring face, thus reducing the geometry complexity through producing larger more easily meshed faces.
Share with your friends: |