Subject : Re: Yes, the Apollo missions were faked.
I was heavily involved in photography during the mid to late 80's. Now it's just a hobby, but it's still at a professional level. I learned quite a bit about optical technologies & photography back then. So I had a sharp' eye for things I see, especially being able to notice anomalies in photos. You could say that I have a 'trained' eye. If I had to swear to it in a court of law, I would have to tell them that I honestly believe a photo with anomalies like that cannot be done without pasting the foreground image over the background. It's the only possible way to end up with crosshatches behind objects.
Just a quick note to say, at the bottom of your Apollo Hoax Contacts page there is the following e-mail: moonhoax@redzero.co.uk This fool does not believe and instead hosts a rather lame anti-hoax web site here: www.redzero.co.uk/moonhoax. Nice site by the way. Have you seen this: www.aulis.com/nasa.htm
I have looked at all the photos, read some stuff in regards to the fake landing and saw a TV doc on the subject. I think they are fake. However my wife came up with what sounds like a good idea but it sounds so simple that it must already have been thought of. Could the amount of radiation from a supposed moon craft be measured against that of the shuttle, which has never been out side the belt that protects us. Would the shuttle not have a lower radiation level than the craft that went out side the belt?
Sorry not really a good reply, hmmmm means that you have really given me something to think about. The US government is not beyond a scheme this big, and if anybody could pull it off they could. I was seventeen the day man was supposed to have, erm, landed on the Moon. Eric Clapton was playing in town. Now I really am glad to say that instead of staying home to watch a fraud performance, I went to see something that was real. Thanks. Rick.
Hey there. Further proof that the photos are, of course, faked. NASA supposedly scored ALL of their photo lenses with little "+" crosses, for purposes of depth perception or some business like that. In many photos, these crosses are simply not there. Pretty stupid. In your photos, check out cockup #8. In the bottom photo, the cross is CLEARLY obscured by the flag. If the cross is etched into the lens, how could the flag possibly cover it? Because the flag is superimposed/pasted on photo. GREAT site.
I came across your site by accident and was fascinated by it. I have one question for you. Your theory should be very easy to prove. Why doesn't someone point the Hubble Space Telescope at the site(s) of the landings to confirm?
Thanks for maintaining this tremendous site. I am 25 years old and had never had reason to question the moon landing until a friend of mine explained the impossibility to me. I found your site through the Iwon.com search engine and have enjoyed the very conclusive evidence you provide here. My belief in the moon landing was not from being gullible but merely being uneducated. I was told in school that the United States landed on the moon and at that time I was more interested in girls than school so it didn't matter much to me. The first question my friend asked me was why, if we made six successful trips to the moon, haven't we been back in 34 years? I had no answer for him. I don't know why I dismissed it so easily until now. I guess I never had a reason to question the validity of NASA's claim. Thanks to your excellent site I now know the entire truth and have the necessary information to inform others of this hoax. This is just one more example of how the strong delusion is a part of today's society. Sincerely, Steve Coats
Hi my name is Jason. I am doing a debate on TV for the moon hoax. I am going with the hoax cause I know we didn't land on it. But a lot of girls are going against me. Can you give me the most breath taking information. I have a lot but I know you could help. How can they pass the radiation belt near the Moon, it says in the Compton Encyclopedia that no world organic material can go by it?
From: "maryandbillrees" Subject: Great Conversation
Hi, Just wanted to tell you the hours of truly great conversation that your site has let me enjoy! Very well done. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From : "Plutonium Films"
Subject : Linkage request
WOW! Am still looking at your site! Where the hell did you get all those photos of BG's of the moon? The Langley site is easy, but that BIG HUGE Background of Lunar Surface? Also, your study of the BG - the two hills and crater and the rock. Excellent work. Who are you? Call me. 661-245-3847 I'll hang up and call you back. I LOVE your site! Wish I had MORE time to research this stuff. Just getting old and tired. But, I really like your materials. Please link my WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON. I am Ross Marshall, first to interview and produce a full length video docu of Bill Kaysing. I know where he is and how you can call him. I trade a link on your site and will put you on my site and give you his phone number. Please don't be too detailed, as he is in retirement and getting old.