Cultural Heritage Baseline and Issues in Target Regions

10 Cultural Heritage Baseline and Issues in Target Regions

Armenia is a country with a rich cultural heritage. About 33 000 historical and cultural monuments are located in about 4 500 complexes with a total territory of 20 000 hectares. Armenian culture is represented by over 4,000 years of rich history, unique culture architecture, literature, art of singing, dance, applied art, as well as cultural-historical monuments. There are museums of local, national and global significance as valuable, typical and unique monuments of the history, spirituality and culture of Armenians. The majority of the most famous monuments are rather well-preserved and/or reasonably well-restored. Three of cultural-historical and nature monuments are among global cultural treasures (UNESCO): Haghpat – Sanahin, Geghardavank and the valley of Azat river, Etchmiadzin together with its Zvartnots temple.

- Issue of effective monitoring of the protection and restoration processes of monuments requires establishment of an inspectorate with powers to conduct inspections in order to verify the situation of protected monuments;

- Need for strengthening of existing accountability measures – fines and penalties;

(The relevant article of the law “On the Protection and Use of Immovable Historical and Cultural Monuments and Historical Environment”, states that legal and physical entities that damage monuments or their protection zones should restore their prior state or, in cases where the restoration is no longer possible, should compensate the losses according to the legislation. This provision is not being enforced, though, because there is no regulation for determining the amount of due compensation;

- Despite the fact that the laws “On the Protection and Use of Immovable Historical and Cultural

Monuments and Historical Environment”, “On urban planning”, as well as relevant articles of the “Land Code” define the usage regime for specially protected historical-cultural lands, monuments and their protected historical environment, regulations allowing enforcement of such regime are not enacted yet. Currently, the draft Government decree “On approving the definition order of using regime of historical and cultural immovable monuments” is under discussion;

- As a rule, for the implementation of programs on reconstruction/rehabilitation of the urban environment, state and community budget allocations (approved in the frames of target programs) are scarce and it is necessary to combine the activities of state and local self-governance bodies and also involve the private sector, NGOs, etc.;

- There are very few long-term programs for cultural heritage protection, restoration and use. In addition, there is a lack of qualified companies specializing in the designing and performing interventions at the historic monuments and other heritage sites;

- Problem of a lack of financial resources for the conservation, rehabilitation and preservation of cultural heritage.
The Heritage Assessment Report for Armenia, produced in 2010 under the Kyiv Initiative Regional Programme 2: Rehabilitation of Cultural Heritage in Historic Towns supported by the EU/EC identifies the following priority issues for action:

• 
  Development of a site management plans for the protection zones,
  
• 
  Mandatory signing of liability contracts with the owners of monuments according to the existing legislation.
  
• 
  Training and retraining of monument restoration specialists.
  
• 
  Establishment of monument protection zones in the areas of active urban development.
  
• 
  Preparation of spatial planning documents giving priority to the communities having historical cultural heritage and determining urban development regimes in the monument protection zones.
  
• 
  Provision of a necessary material-technical basis for the study and rehabilitation of monuments (lack of modern equipment).
  
• 
  Addressing bad conditions of the roads leading to monuments and in some cases difficult to access terrain.
  
• 
  Optimized use of the limited funding.
  

In 2008-2009, the impact of the global financial crisis had negative consequences for the protection of cultural heritage sector. Both the volumes of state budget allocations for the conservation of cultural heritage, as well as public and private sector investments have significantly reduced. The investments done by the MoC for monuments’ recovery and strengthening have been conditioned by the RA Government's strategic investment programs, which include the most endangered monuments needed urgent intervention and protection. As a result of target interventions and investments of RA state budget allocations, the MoC has expanded the geography of rehabilitated monuments on yearly basis. Rehabilitation projects are implemented at the monuments that are representing most important tourism destinations.