Australian Senate Political Preferences allocated by each party in each state/territory — for the election of 7 Sep 2013

Download 4.61 Mb.

Page	11/11
Date	05.05.2018
Size	4.61 Mb.
	#47877

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

10. Some previous election preference-figures
11. Ondwelle’s involvement in Social Biological “unsolvables”

9. NSW (part 2)

			Lib/Nat (duplicate!)	Austr. Protectionists	Animal Justice Party	Australia First Party	Austr. Independents	Drug Law Reform	Socialist Equality (1/3)	Socialist Equality (2/3)	Socialist Equality (3/3)	Democrats (1/2)	Democrats (2/2)	{Wang Group}	Family First Party	Stable Population (1/3)	Stable Population (2/3)	Stable Population (3/3)	Shooters and Fishers	Stop CSG	Austr. Republicans	Socialist Alliance	Non-Custodial Parents	Pirate Party	Secular Party	Motoring Enthusiasts	One Nation (1/2)	One Nation (2/2)	Party list again (as right- hand column) Part 2 for NSW
#	Party	tgt	Y	Z	AA	AB	AC	AD	AE1	AE2	AE3	AF1	AF2	AG	AH	AI1	AI2	AI3	AJ	AK	AL	AM	AN	AO	AP	AQ	AR1	AR2	Party
2	Liberal Democrats	`A	34	81	65	66	79	20	83	68	50	109	109	65	42	59	59	59	70	100	3	67	57	32	25	59	59	59	Liberal Democrats
2	Climate Sceptics	`B	28	10	26	10	51	65	85	70	52	63	63	94	23	97	97	97	25	104	11	86	10	91	84	37	18	18	Climate Sceptics
2	DLP	`C	14	38	103	60	77	52	87	72	54	44	44	92	63	87	87	87	28	91	101	59	47	59	94	75	14	14	DLP
3	Senator Online	`D	38	33	9	14	48	15	89	74	56	19	19	71	3	3	3	3	3	5	17	42	20	15	63	22	11	11	Senator Online
2	Voluntary Euthanasia	`E	76	65	16	38	21	22	92	77	59	17	17	74	91	23	23	23	94	28	15	20	32	28	7	43	24	24	Voluntary Euthanasia
2	“Group F”	`F	64	59	101	89	81	54	94	79	61	65	65	63	101	61	61	61	57	96	103	95	59	55	103	77	73	73	“Group F”
2	HEMPParty	`G	90	55	18	48	44	5	96	81	63	11	11	57	81	25	25	25	20	12	13	18	89	26	29	15	40	40	HEMPParty
2	Carers Alliance	`H	16	14	99	58	75	56	98	83	65	30	30	59	55	50	50	50	61	55	33	36	14	38	13	71	34	34	Carers Alliance
2	The Wikileaks Party	`I	86	57	32	36	46	30	100	85	67	28	28	61	67	39	39	39	92	3	54	10	34	9	11	47	89	89	The Wikileaks Party
2	Rise Up Australia	`J	98	29	43	44	53	67	102	87	69	67	67	96	34	105	105	105	19	106	89	102	36	100	90	49	36	36	Rise Up Australia
2	Future Party	`K	44	83	24	52	55	58	104	89	71	69	69	3	51	101	101	101	34	16	62	40	38	20	5	53	87	87	Future Party
5	Chris-Dem (Fred Nile)	`L	7	46	52	82	14	103	106	91	73	58	58	101	44	54	54	54	11	80	95	88	42	93	98	102	6	6	Chris-Dem (Fred Nile)
6	Labor	`M	80	96	73	80	103	40	3	96	78	46	52	15	75	75	69	81	80	61	66	30	96	70	34	90	99	93	Labor
2	Katter's Austr. Party	`N	22	22	105	56	87	63	9	102	84	24	24	69	40	48	48	48	66	60	74	63	67	81	68	65	4	4	Katter's Austr. Party
3	Australian Voice	`O	41	7	36	3	25	60	11	104	86	71	71	98	16	16	16	16	5	30	45	71	23	48	72	19	46	46	Australian Voice
2	Sex Party	`P	74	85	28	54	19	7	14	107	89	26	26	67	89	35	35	35	27	24	9	26	83	18	9	35	61	61	Sex Party
2	Fishing & Lifestyle	`Q	32	51	109	31	57	69	16	109	91	74	74	76	32	33	33	33	18	78	43	76	53	63	70	31	49	49	Fishing & Lifestyle
6	Greens	`R	100	104	67	106	91	34	18	3	93	36	36	29	83	69	75	75	110	43	56	4	106	3	19	96	105	105	Greens
2	Palmer United Party	`S	20	44	63	62	89	71	24	9	99	42	42	9	65	95	95	95	72	76	76	65	65	85	66	69	65	65	Palmer United Party
2	Building Australia	`T	24	12	20	6	12	13	26	11	101	76	76	13	12	31	31	31	4	18	41	74	12	44	61	6	30	30	Building Australia
2	Uniting Australia Party	`U	46	16	39	23	23	73	28	13	103	78	78	82	25	21	21	21	7	74	78	61	69	71	51	61	85	85	Uniting Australia Party
2	Stop The Greens	`V	48	42	97	68	85	75	30	15	105	80	80	80	49	109	109	109	74	98	22	84	55	87	86	55	67	67	Stop The Greens
2	Smokers Rights	`W	78	71	95	93	83	77	32	17	107	82	82	78	53	99	99	99	76	88	39	78	87	83	77	57	69	69	Smokers Rights
2	Bullet Train for Austr.	`X	54	24	14	40	30	18	34	19	109	15	15	5	8	19	19	19	9	22	91	16	61	40	47	39	32	32	Bullet Train for Austr.
6	Liberal/National/Liberal	`Y	1	87	74	81	97	46	36	21	3	52	46	21	69	81	81	69	86	83	48	47	80	77	55	86	93	99	Liberal/National/Liberal
2	Austr. Protectionists	`Z	60	1	41	21	59	79	42	27	9	84	84	84	38	103	103	103	15	35	64	104	16	89	88	17	63	63	Austr. Protectionists
2	Animal Justice Party	AA	58	73	1	46	32	9	44	29	11	5	5	55	59	6	6	6	96	8	31	24	30	34	31	51	55	55	Animal Justice Party
2	Australia First Party	AB	106	18	34	1	7	83	46	31	13	86	86	109	10	107	107	107	8	39	35	106	6	105	92	25	57	57	Australia First Party
2	Austr. Independents	AC	96	36	22	19	1	24	48	33	15	13	13	35	21	14	14	14	24	20	37	57	28	22	43	29	26	26	Austr. Independents
2	Drug Law Reform	AD	88	67	12	50	36	1	50	35	17	7	7	37	61	29	29	29	14	53	25	22	97	24	27	41	71	71	Drug Law Reform
2	Socialist Equality Party	AE	92	108	83	97	109	81	1	1	1	32	32	39	109	93	93	93	102	57	82	28	107	51	45	109	53	53	Socialist Equality Party
2	Australian Democrats	AF	36	53	5	27	34	3	52	37	19	1	1	27	36	12	12	12	26	14	29	38	81	11	3	45	81	81	Australian Democrats
2	“AG Group” {Wang}	AG	62	79	85	87	73	85	54	39	21	88	88	1	99	63	63	63	51	94	109	97	63	57	105	79	75	75	“AG Group” {Wang}
2	Family First Party	AH	18	40	30	12	42	87	56	41	23	90	90	90	1	37	37	37	12	37	93	93	40	98	96	33	20	20	Family First Party
2	Stable Population	AI	50	106	3	42	3	11	58	43	25	3	3	53	6	1	1	1	78	10	5	45	26	36	49	4	28	28	Stable Population
2	Shooters and Fishers	AJ	12	31	107	29	5	89	60	45	27	101	101	88	27	91	91	91	1	102	100	80	51	75	79	13	38	38	Shooters and Fishers
2	Stop CSG	AK	52	3	7	25	40	26	62	47	29	9	9	86	19	10	10	10	98	1	20	14	18	30	53	27	22	22	Stop CSG
2	Austr. Republicans	AL	70	61	61	91	63	91	64	49	31	92	92	7	95	46	46	46	64	69	1	55	85	42	17	73	83	83	Austr. Republicans
2	Socialist Alliance	AM	94	110	87	99	71	93	66	51	33	34	34	41	107	89	89	89	100	49	80	1	109	46	41	107	51	51	Socialist Alliance
2	Non-Custodial Parents	AN	30	5	45	8	65	95	68	53	35	94	94	43	57	27	27	27	13	33	27	82	1	61	39	8	16	16	Non-Custodial Parents
2	Pirate Party	AO	72	63	59	64	61	28	70	55	37	103	103	45	97	52	52	52	59	41	84	12	49	1	15	63	77	77	Pirate Party
2	Secular Party	AP	56	69	57	95	38	32	72	57	39	22	22	11	93	44	44	44	68	51	7	53	99	13	1	67	42	42	Secular Party
2	Motoring Enthusiasts	AQ	26	20	47	17	28	97	74	59	41	96	96	47	14	8	8	8	6	26	72	69	8	53	75	1	44	44	Motoring Enthusiasts
3	One Nation	AR	108	26	49	33	9	108	76	61	43	98	98	106	29	41	41	41	10	95	86	108	3	102	81	10	1	1	One Nation
1	(POULSEN, Ron) —	UG1	66	75	89	107	67	99	79	64	46	105	105	49	103	65	65	65	53	110	105	3	71	107	107	81	91	91	(POULSEN, Ron) —
1	(ASH, David) —	UG2	67	76	90	108	68	100	80	65	47	106	106	50	104	66	66	66	54	109	106	99	72	108	108	82	92	92	(ASH, David) —
1	(NATHAN, Sam) —	UG3	68	77	91	109	69	101	81	66	48	107	107	51	105	67	67	67	55	108	107	100	73	109	109	83	79	79	(NATHAN, Sam) —
1	(La MELA, John) —	UG4	69	78	92	110	70	102	82	67	49	108	108	52	106	68	68	68	56	107	108	101	74	110	110	84	80	80	(La MELA, John) —

10. Some previous election preference-figures

For previous elections, you might like to inspect:

www.ondwelle.com/Preferences_Senate2004Vic.rtf

www.ondwelle.com/Preferences_Senate2007Vic.rtf

www.ondwelle.com/Preferences_Senate2010Vic.rtf

www.ondwelle.com/Preferences_Senate2010Qld.rtf

www.ondwelle.com/Preferences_Senate2010NSW.rtf

11. Ondwelle’s involvement in Social & Biological “unsolvables”

Ondwelle Publications is mainly concerned with research-problems which seem to have “got bogged-down by some mystery” — perhaps due to mistaken hidden assumptions.
(It is uncertain whether these present electoral figures fit neatly into that agenda, but they may be informative anyhow!).
Better examples include:

● Social/Economic: Analysing the world’s-dilemma: “Needed economic growth” versus “Limits to growth”

(limits for two reasons — environmental AND market saturation);

Most politicians offer only short-term pseudo-solutions, hence the GFC etc — and many do not even understand this macro-situation.

(Is that reflected in the above confused political scene?)
● Theory-of-Knowledge: E.g. Popper’s “scientific method”, while mainly sound in principle, has some seldom-recognized faults.
It is argued that the consequences are sometimes quite unfortunate.
● Value judgements — See a forthcoming thesis publication

● Psycho-Biology: On info-tech grounds, it is argued that present brain-theory must have overlooked some extra phenomena — probably involving text-like coding and short-range infra-red.

● Insect perception, and our understanding of its uncanny nature.

A very flawed “debate” of 1977, led to misleading doctrine.

Our discussion has critiqued both sides of this argument and led to new important conclusions based on the original evidence

● Etc.

R.R.Traill ( www.ondwelle.com ), 6 Sep 2013

Download 4.61 Mb.

Share with your friends:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11