, Online Edition, Thursday, April 29, 2010.
VENICE, La.—Coast Guard crews in the Gulf of Mexico Wednesday set fire to a portion of an oil slick spreading from a deepwater well, which the agency said was leaking at a far greater rate than it had believed.
Rear Adm. Mary Landry said that 5,000 barrels a day were now estimated to be leaking, five times the previous estimate of 1,000 barrels, after the agency found a significant new oil leak.
Ms. Landry said she briefed President Barack Obama and that the government has offered the services of the Department of Defense to help contain the spill.
The upgraded estimates, announced late Wednesday night, came after the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration studied aerial surveys of the oil's trajectory, Ms. Landry said.
Doug Suttles, chief operating officer for BP Exploration and Production, which leased the rig, said the location of the newly detected leak was just atop an automatic shutoff mechanism —known as a blowout preventer—that the company has been trying to activate since Sunday to shut off the well.
The spill could strike the Louisiana coast before the end of the week, Mr. Suttles added.
Mr. Suttles didn't confirm the Coast Guard's 5,000-barrel estimate. "We do not believe this changes the amount currently estimated to be released,'' Mr. Suttles said.
The burning technique conducted earlier in the day was deemed by experts to be the safest, cheapest way to limit environmental damage. But it has never been tried on this scale.
"Burning oil on the water is the most environmentally friendly technique that one can think of," said combustion expert Anil Kulkarni at Pennsylvania State University, who has studied the technique for the National Institutes of Standards and Technology.
The controlled oil fire at sea started Wednesday evening in a small area of the gulf spill and lasted for a little over an hour, said Coast Guard spokesman David Mosley.
Results of the test burn weren't immediately disclosed. These oil fires pose some problems. Smoke plumes from the burning oil are thick with soot. Typically, there are also traces of toxic sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide.
However these tend to dissipate quickly, say researchers who have studied the process, and the toxic oil compounds that might be most harmful to wildlife are consumed in the fire.
Experiments conducted by the Canadian government have shown that the chemical byproducts of oil burning appear to have little effect on marine species.
Although the spill already covers an area about the size of Jamaica, crews can burn only a small portion at a time.
They have to corral a patch of oil with fireproof booms and then ignite it with a flare—a job made harder by wind and waves. To keep the burning oil contained, they then must tow the entire setup, so that the current keeps the burning oil floating between the booms.
"We are trying to light on fire wet oil in the middle of the ocean," said Chris Reddy, who studies oil spills as director of the Coastal Ocean Institute at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.
It already may be too late to incinerate the oldest portions of the spill, which has been growing from damaged well pipes 5,000 feet underwater since the Transocean rig Deepwater Horizon caught fire and sank last week.
Researchers have experimented with the burning technique since it was first tried after the spill from the tanker Exxon Valdez in 1989.
Crews are also spreading thousands of gallons of chemical dispersants—usually detergents or alcohol-based solvents—to speed the rate at which the oil dissolves in seawater.
In Venice, a fishing and oil-field-services outpost at the southern tip of Louisiana that is the closest community to the oil spill, residents and local officials hoped that the controlled burning would help keep the crude away from the fragile ecosystem and valuable fisheries.
© 2010 Dow Jones & Company. All Rights Reserved.