Beginning with his work with Roxy Music, Eno has enjoyed working with a host of rock luminaries. Roxy Music’s tatement was as much visual and conceptual as it was musical, Bryan Ferry tantalizing his audience with his air of jaded elegance and with the endless procession of surreal, anguishing anima/lover figures in his lyrics. On the two albums Eno recorded with Roxy Music, it is difficult to pinpoint Eno’s musical contribution, except for a few inspired synthesizer solos of the “funny sounds” variety. Although Eno’s solo albums show a decisive turn away from rock after Before and After Science of 1977, he has continued to collaborate with other musicians in the making of rock albums, and has been much in demand as a producer and session musician. Robert Fripp has called Eno a “catalytic creature” whose thoughtful, interested presence at a recording session was bound to increase the endeavor’s chances of artistic success.381 Of the many records that Eno had a hand in making, those with Fripp, David Bowie, and David Byrne and Talking Heads deserve special mention for the unusual nature of their contents and for their influence on the direction of rock.
With Robert Fripp
No Pussyfooting, the first of the two major Eno/Fripp collaborations, grew out of Eno’s early experiments with tape recorders, out of Fripp’s ability to supply the appropriate kind of musical input from an electric guitar, and out of the musical chemistry between the two musicians. By the time Eno invited Fripp to come over and play in his London home studio in September, 1972,382 Eno had worked out a system of producing music by means of using two tape recorders set up so that when a single sound was played, it was heard several seconds later at a slightly lower volume level, then again several seconds later at a still lower volume level, and so on. The length of time between an event and its repetition depended on the speed of the tape and the distance between the two tape recorders. Example 13, which is based on the diagram Eno made for the back cover of Discreet Music, shows the physical set-up in simplified form. Only two reels are used, the feeding reel of tape recorder 1 and the take-up reel of tape recorder 2, with the ribbon of tape stretching between the two recorders.
Example 13
|
|
Eno and Fripp’s signal-delay system
|
Used for No Pussyfooting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Output stored
on master tape
|
|
|
delay return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
delay
line
|
|
Electric guitar
|
|
|
|
output
|
record
head
|
|
playback
head
|
|
|
|
Tape Recorder 1
|
|
Tape Recorder 2
|
New sounds could thus be introduced and layered on top of the old ones without erasing them. The repeating, looped signal – typically about five seconds long – could be allowed to repeat and decay indefinitely (in such a case, owing to the very slight deterioration of tonal definition each time the signal passed through the loop, the tone color would change almost imperceptibly with time, growing very gradually more noise-like, and shifting towards the bass end of the frequency spectrum), with or without an independent “solo” line being played over the top, the looped signal could be interrupted at will, to create empty acoustical space for new events, or, perhaps most characteristically, it could be made to decay at a slow but steady rate, while new input was being added at a similarly slow but steady rate, so that the total effect was one of a complex, slowly changing, kaleidoscopic musical texture composed of simple motives, each only a few seconds in length, which were most prominent immediately when introduced, and which inexorably marched into the aural background.
It takes many words indeed to describe a musical process that, once heard, is immediately and intuitively grasped. Side One of No Pussyfooting is a twenty-one-minute piece called “The Heavenly Music Corporation” made in one take, using the process described above, with Fripp providing the motivic input and with Eno “playing” the tape recorders – determining the rate of the layered motives’ march into oblivion, creating new acoustical room when necessary or desirable, and adjusting the density or saturation of the timbral space. Contrary to what one might hear in a superficial listening, there is nothing mechanical about this process. Fripp and Eno needed to be in creative synch with one another in order to build, tinker with, and dismantle, in real-time, the musical structures we perceive.
“The Heavenly Music Corporation” begins with a single sustained note on electric guitar that is looped back on itself to form a continuous drone. After a time, upper harmonics, notably the fifth and minor seventh, begin to emerge. Listening to this drone, the mind’s interpretive mechanisms are apt to undergo changes. For a period, we are bound to hear “just a long note,” and impatiently wonder what, if anything, is going to “happen.” But after a certain point, given the lack of obvious musical activity, we become aware that the single note is an incredibly complex entity in itself: that it is not staying the same at all, that there is rhythm, melody, harmony, and timbre wrapped up inside it – that, in short, it is vibrantly alive, and does not need anything else added or changed to be enjoyed, to be experienced musically.
After several minutes, more things do start to happen in a conventionally musical sense. A slow, concentrated, intense guitar melody emerges, phrase by phrase, consisting of isolated notes, short motives, glissandi, or longer linear improvisations. Some of these phrases are allowed to enter into the signal loop, becoming “accompaniment” on their recurrences, at other times, the melody becomes a “solo,” detached from the loop, just riding a crest on top of the palpitating mass of sound. The only consistent pulse in “The Heavenly Music Corporation” is of the length of the signal loop, and at about three seconds, this is rather too slow to perceive as a pulse or beat in the traditional sense: it is more akin to the experience of breathing than the heartbeat.
The harmony of the piece is not functional, nor is it particularly triadic, it is based, rather, on the totality of tones that are prominent in the waves of sound at any given moment. The closest term for this kind of harmony in traditional music theory would be “pandiatonicism.” As in Terry Riley’s In C, however, the tonal center and modal type shift over periods of time, here from F# dorian to A major, finally settling into D major towards the end. Within this general tonal framework, Fripp feels free to borrow notes from outside the prevailing modes: scale degrees three, six, and seven in particular may be played in their natural or flatted (minor) forms. Given the retention, in the loop, of many previously heard tones, maneuvering the overall modal impression takes considerable skill – it is a bit like steering a battleship.
Although the tonal architecture of “The Heavenly Music Corporation” must be credited to Fripp, who supplied the pitch material, Eno himself was to use pandiatonicism and the drone idea extensively in subsequent works. If there is a major conceptual difference between this piece and Eno’s later extended works, it has to do with teleology. This piece develops, however slowly: it has a definite beginning (the drone), middle (characterized by rhapsodic guitar solos), and end (a long cadential section marked by a repeated and varied slow glissando to the tonic). Eno’s later extended works, to the contrary, tend to be non-developmental or cyclic.
In a number of other important general ways, though, “The Heavenly Music Corporation,” as a system, anticipates Eno’s own ambient style. First of all, the piece is a system, or process: it represents a way of making music, a concept of music-making, as much as it represents a composition in the traditional sense. The process allowed Eno to operate in his favored gently guiding, rather than authoritarian role. Making the piece required thought and attention, Eno had to contemplate and inspect the sound as it rolled by, making changes and adjustments. The process, meanwhile, yielded maximal output (a lengthy, complex piece of music) from minimal input (selection of pitches and switches). Finally, the signal-loop procedure itself, with its gradually decaying tone quality, exemplified one of Eno’s cherished axioms: “Repetition is a form of change.”
Eno has explained the title of “Swastika Girls,” the long piece that comprises Side Two of No Pussyfooting:
I was walking to the studio one day and there was a piece of magazine someone had ripped out from some porno film magazine, I guess, and it showed a picture of a naked girl with a swastika on her arm giving a ‘Sieg Heil’ salute ... I stuck it on the console and we were just kind of vaguely looking at this and talking about this as we were recording that piece, and so that became the title.383
“Swastika Girls” was recorded in two days at Command Studios in London, about a year after Eno and Fripp made “The Heavenly Music Corporation” in Eno’s home. If it is less successful than the earlier piece, it is because of the much greater overall saturation of the acoustical space: continuous fast guitar picking on a single chord (E major with added sixth and ninth) and an incessantly busy synthesizer sequence present the backdrop for Fripp’s metallic E-lydian melodic guitar lines. There seems to be a perceptual rule that possibilities for appreciation of timbral subtleties decrease in proportion to the rate of actual notes being played. The frenetic quality of the accompaniment on “Swastika Girls” shows that Eno and Fripp had not yet understood the full weight of this principle, it would be nearly a decade before Eno was able to formulate it simply and elegantly – “Every note obscures another.”
Evening Star, released in 1975, was the second and last of the major Fripp/Eno collaborations. The first three tracks on the first side are further experiments in signal looping and guitar and synthesizer layering, which display for the most part qualities typical of the emerging ambient style: static harmony based on a major chord with or without added notes, sometimes with Lydian inflections in the melodic parts, a non-developmental unfolding of events, with a distinct timbral character for each piece, and a variety of ostinati. “Wind on Wind,” the last cut on Side One, is by Eno alone and was recorded at his home studio. Here the ambient style, at least in one of its aspects, is in full bloom. Round, soft-attacked, flute-like tones are spatially enhanced through use of a reverb/delay unit, and short melodic fragments are looped, repeated, and faded. “Wind on Wind,” in fact, sounds very much like a short sketch for “Discreet Music.” The main difference is that in “Discreet Music,” the musical solution will be diluted, allowing for closer inspection, more leisurely and thorough contemplation, of its elements: the delay time will be lengthened, the melodies simplified or de-activated, and the resulting harmonic density rarefied.
The second side of Evening Star consists of a very long Fripp/Eno composition, “An Index of Metals,” recorded at Eno’s studio with much the same straightforward tape signal-loop apparatus as “The Heavenly Music Corporation,” but with Eno providing input from a synthesizer in addition to Fripp’s electric guitar input. Seen in the context of Eno’s ambient music as a whole, “An Index of Metals” is remarkable for two factors: its high dissonance level and its developmental nature. Insofar as it consists of tones (as opposed to noises or unpitched percussive sounds), Eno’s ambient music tends to be very consonant, providing a restful ambiance – even if sometimes tinged with an undercurrent of tension or melancholy. In “An Index of Metals,” the sense of a sinister, intense ambiguity found in many of Eno’s strange progressive rock songs comes to the forefront. It is as dark and foreboding as “The Heavenly Music Corporation” is contemplative and rhapsodic, and it acheives this effect largely through heavy, close dissonances.
Some of the highlights in the piece’s strategy of continuous development or continuous variation may be sketched out here. It opens with a high, metallic-sounding, ringing Eb-G diad, possibly strummed quickly on guitar strings. Like the drone that opens “The Heavenly Music Corporation,” this ringing sound is timbrally complex, with a great deal of inner motion. After about three and a half minutes, some dissonant, complex guitar-produced noise – resembling mosquitos or metallic butterflies – suddenly enters, and is looped. The tonal situation becomes very uncertain, and the timbral balance shifts from tone to noise. About six minutes into the piece, a characteristic sustained, fuzz-tone Fripp guitar melody enters, playing individual notes that become part of the loop. Around the middle of the eighth minute, an F-B tritone predominates the harmonic proceedings, which develops into a dissonant F-B-C chord, a couple of minutes later, E and Eb have been added, raising the level of dissonance to even greater heights. The maneuvering of the atonal battleship continues in this general manner, with emphasis on minor seconds and tritones, until during the twentieth minute of the piece a fade-down takes place, the existing signal loop being allowed to run its course with no new inupt. Eventually, the ringing sound from the beginning comes in again in a more complex form – so complex that it is difficult to make out individual pitches – and becomes the most prominent feature of the texture. From about the twenty-sixth minute to the end some three minutes later, little or no new input is added, but Eno adjusts and manipulates the long fade-out of the looped signal, which, owing to the analog nature of the process, becomes ever more noise-like, gradually losing high frequencies and general tonal definition.
In all, “An Index of Metals” is bound to strike the listener not so much as a musical development as an almost tangibly sculptural process, Eno and Fripp using electronic tools to give shape to the invisible black marble of silence. During this period, they occasionally gave live performances together of music that sounded much like what we hear on No Pussyfooting and Evening Star. The rock press paid less attention to their collaborations in this vein than to Fripp’s work with King Crimson or Eno’s solo rock albums. One critic wrote a sympathetic review of a Fripp/Eno performance at the London Palladium in June 1975 that included the comment:
There was such variety in the textures created that, depending upon the degree of individual concentration, one could focus on one of any of the levels of sound patterns. One therefore became a participant in the creative process, creating through individual selection individual compositions for oneself, rather than blindly accepting an already well-defined and regulated musical formula.384
Fripp was to undertake a global tour in 1979, performing alone in small venues and record stores with his guitar and two tape recorders set up as Eno had taught him, he would repeatedly stress the importance of the audience’s creative listening contribution.385
In 1973, Fripp’s reputation and standing in the rock press and among a large following in Great Britain and the United States was, if controversial, already firmly established through a string of diverse and original King Crimson albums. For Eno’s budding career, the release in the same year of the contemplative No Pussyfooting and the frenetic Here Come the Warm Jets was a risky move, but one that set him on the eclectic course he was to follow. As he explained,
The difference between those two albums created a kind of confusion about my image, which my managers bewailed. But it proved to be the best move I could have made – and it was quite by accident. It put me in a position where I don’t have to be consistent. I can start each record anew, without having a trademark.386
Share with your friends: |