Case study notes



Download 187.23 Kb.
Page9/11
Date19.10.2016
Size187.23 Kb.
#3485
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11

Case study notes


Nestled alongside the Olympic Park in the heart of Munich’s industrial district, to the north of the city, sits Munich Gases: a German industrial gas company with a long history of supplying gases and liquids to firms across Europe. Its product range is dominated by liquid oxygen which it supplies to health care markets and carbon dioxide which it supplies to the drinks and beverages industry. With a market capitalisation of €10 billion Munich Gases is one of the industry leaders. It also has a proud history of successful R&D which has helped to maintain its dominant position over the past 80 years. This case study tells the story of how Munich Gases uncovered a multi-billion dollar market opportunity for whitening teeth, and explored how best to exploit it.

Case study questions


1. Should the Munich Gases invest €10 million in this new product project?

Students simply need to consider all the facts supporting investment and then all the unknowns. Clearly, there is no right answer and much would depend on the current portfolio of products that the company holds.



2. What other factors may yet decide the fate of this project?

The wider economic issues may influence the decision to invest. Also, safety reports that determine the product is unsafe to use. Consumer testing of the concept may suggest consumers would not purchase.



3. Which market should Munich Gases select? The consumer product market or professional/business market?

This is the key decision. Both options are possible. One is less risky but the consumer market carries the potential for greater rewards. The professional market may be easier to enter. Of course it may be possible to enter both in the long-term.



4. Sketch out five different possible business models. Of these determine which is the most profitable and which is most likely to succeed?

Creativity is required here. The business model should contain:

i. A graphical representation (usually in the form of a flow chart);

ii. A list of activities, on the part of both the business owner and potential customers;

iii. A likely sequence for those activities (which may later be altered in the light of customer behaviour);

iv. A set of indicators or metrics for measuring the linkage between the activities.

There is a key question that needs to be addressed:

How will this business make money?

To answer this question it is necessary to address a series of additional questions such as:

Who is the target customer?

What customer problem or challenge does the business solve?

What value does it deliver?

How does it reach, acquire and keep customers?

How does it define and differentiate its offering?

How does it generate revenue?

What is the cost structure?

What is the profit margin?

5. How will the powerful toothpaste brand owners react?

If, a consumer market product is developed one of the big brands would surely want to be associated with the product. If not they could fight the product with propaganda etc. Care is required here, and it would be better to have one of the big FMCG brand management companies on your side rather than try to fight them all.



6. Should Munich Gases secure an entry into the market with one of Europe’s leading multiples (e.g. Lidl, Tesco, Carefour, Aldi)?

This could be an alternative way to enter the market. The retailers will provide direct access to consumers. The product will be on the shelf and should generate sales.



7. Should Munich Gases secure the endorsement of one of Europe’s leading toothpaste brands (e.g. Aquafresh; Signal; Macleans) before entering the market?

The answer is surely yes. A good business deal could be developed here that means all parties win.



8. How can the firm reassure uneasy consumers about the safety of plasma in their mouths?

Probably through education and reassurance. It may be possible to get endorsement from a professional group or even possibly a well-known male/female model.



Case study notes


Since launching their business in 1999 ‘innocent’ has not only witnessed the rise of its own business but also the rise of the smoothie market and the rise of competitors. While being the market leader, the recent purchase of the number two smoothie brand, PJ Smoothies, by the multinational PepsiCo firm means that ‘innocent’ can expect fierce competition as it attempts to be the dominant smoothie brand in Europe. This case study tells the story of how ‘innocent’ developed a business idea into a product and launched it into the UK market with very limited funds. At that time, the smoothie market was in its infancy, although ‘innocent’ was not the first into the market and could not benefit from any early entrant advantages. Nonetheless, the launch of the product coincided with the rapid growth of the market, especially in the form of own-label smoothies from Sainsbury, Tesco and M&S.

Case study questions


1. ‘innocent’ are very clear about the image it wishes to project to the public. This is one based around being different, fun-loving and having a carefree approach to life. This hippie style image has helped the brand become acceptable to the young urban professionals at whom it is aimed. But beneath the surface of this image there is evidence of a very different business that could be characterised as ruthless, single-minded, profit driven and very business orientated. Where is the evidence of the latter?

There are clear benefits in trying to portray a devil-may-care approach to life, the so-called hippie style; this appeals to the target audience. However, the evidence available suggests something different. The background of the three is one of privilege (one of the three founders attended Winchester college). This may not be the rags to riches story they like to imply. Furthermore, while the founders like to portray themselves as alternative and outrageous they all benefited from conventional excellent university education at Cambridge University. This was followed by successful careers in banking and management consultancy in the City of London. Finally, the decision to take a few months unpaid leave from their employment while trying to establish the business suggests a risk-averse style that differs considerably from the one they like to portray.



2. The success of the business is partly based on extremely good communications with retailers. How is this achieved?

‘innocent’ place emphasis on communication with retailers rather than consumers. It is their view that it is retailers who buy their products and who will display and stock them. ‘innocent’ try to keep retailers happy; they give lots of promotional materials to retailers and invite them all for entertainment days.

You could discuss the role of suppliers and their relationship with retailers/consumers.

3. What type of financing did ‘innocent’ secure? Does it matter?

Viewers of the BBC series Dragons Den will recognise this issue. For all start-up businesses leveraging in finance to pay for manufacturing, distribution or promotion costs a lot of money. Very often, entrepreneurs have to sell a significant stake of the business 20–60 per cent to get £100,000 of investment. This is usually because the business idea has yet to be fully tested and a large injection of cash is a risk that may result in all that money being lost.

In the case of ‘innocent’, Maurice Pinto, a wealthy American businessman invested £2,50,000 and became the fourth shareholder in the group, retaining a 20 per cent stake. The money provided salaries for the three entrepreneurs, office space, cash to buy production capacity at bottling plants, promotional material and labelling for the bottles.

4. Would you sell out to Coca-Cola for £400 million? As one of the three shareholders you could pocket £100 million. If not, why not?

Students will like discussing this. Getting their hands on a lot of money is usually too tempting. But even bigger riches are available if you look at Bill Gates or Dyson. Despite receiving many offers, both these entrepreneurs did not sell out during the growth stages of their businesses. Both are now billionaires (50 and 1, respectively).



5. ‘innocent’ benefited from a key advantage: what was this, and explain how it helped in the product development process.

The entrepreneurs were all members of the target market. They were young, wealthy and worked in a large city. The target market was 20/30 somethings who wanted to try something different, something healthy. It was an expensive beverage at £2. A can of coke is 60p!

The product development process involved trying out and testing ideas, packaging, flavours, pricing, etc. Sometimes, firms get the marketing of a product or service wrong. In this case, the decision-makers were part of the target market, hence they were able to draw on their own experience when making the decision regarding the bundling of the offer.

6. How is ‘innocent’ ‘virtual’ and how is this different from traditional food and drink manufacturers? What advantages and disadvantages does this provide?

‘innocent’ do not own any manufacturing or packaging resources. Hence, all production, bottling and packaging of the beverage are undertaken by contract bottling plants. This is a weakness in terms of level of control but offers advantages in terms of flexibility, capital investment, etc.

Other considerations:

delivery, reliability, quality, leakage of intellectual property from contractors to other manufacturers, control of the brand and its value is less secure if there is too much reliance on others.



7. Use CIM (Figure 1.9) to illustrate the innovation process.

Natural sciences cycle

Many innovations are applications of existing technology; in such cases, this part of the framework may not be used. In this case, there is no new science. This is such a case. Indeed, there is limited technical innovation in this case.



Integrated engineering cycle

As with so many innovations, this is where most of the technical effort takes place. In this case, there was little new technology. There was a certain amount of new manufacturing techniques required because of the high fruit content and improving the shelf life without adding additional chemicals. But mostly this case was about branding and launching a new product.



Differentiated services cycle

During this phase, the technology is adapted to meet the specific needs of customers. In this case, emphasis was placed on the creation of a brand image is crucial here, and especially so for products in FMCG markets. For all new entrants into an existing market, the aim is to try to get existing users to change to your brand of fruit smoothie and to try to attract new buyers who currently purchase bottled water or Coca-Cola, for example. The brand image developed and carefully nurtured by ‘innocent’ is one based on fun, and an almost hippie approach to life. This is reflected in the packaging, promotion and logo used for the product.

Design has played a big role in the product’s success, from the logo and shape of the bottles to the delivery vans. Careful consideration of design and packaging has contributed to the success of the business. The brand was totally unknown, so ‘innocent’ had to rely on people being intrigued enough to try the product. It is not a cheap drink, so it had to appeal to the consumer and it had to stand out and look like something you would want to pick up. Finally, like all beverage producers, ‘innocent’ relied on the taste to be sufficiently good to ensure a repeat purchase.

Social sciences cycle

This cycle can often involve negotiations with regulators or governments.

‘Innocent’ has not spent large sums of money on television, press or radio promotion. Emphasis is placed on packaging design and retailers who stock and shelf the product. Advertising copy tends to be witty and straightforward, as does other communications material. The relationship with retailers has been built up through regular communication, including a newsletter, which combines product information and fun stories.

Entrepreneur

Sometimes this can be a single individual; in this case, it was the three friends – the owners of the business. They have grown the business from small beginnings in London and created an international brand. The firm owns little equipment such as manufacturing sites. Its business model is similar to that of Coca-Cola, whereby it sells the licence to produce around the world.

In the early days of the business, raising money to finance the business development was crucial and this was a key part of the business’ success.

Large sums of money are now required to position the brand in the minds of the consumer. This is something brands like Coca-Cola have spent over 100 years doing.



Download 187.23 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page