Centre for disability research and policy



Download 454.22 Kb.
Page3/3
Date08.01.2017
Size454.22 Kb.
#7913
1   2   3




Education & Skills



Non-school qualifications:

Percentage of people aged 25–29 years with non-school qualifications
D

62%

61%

66%

49%

55%

56%

66%

63%

63%

64%

62%

Not

62%

68%

68%

68%

67%

70%

66%

69%

67%

70%

71%

OR/p

CI


1.01

0.74-1.39
0.73

0.52-1.03
0.93

0.66-1.31
0.45***

0.32-0.64
0.59**

0.42-0.81
0.56**

0.40-0.79
0.98

0.72-1.34
0.77

0.52-1.12
0.86

0.62-1.19
0.77

0.54-1.08
0.68**

0.51-0.91

Social Resources


Support from family/friends in time of crisis:

Percentage of people aged 18 years and over who feel that they have someone to turn to in crisisvii
D

75%

80%

78%

78%

77%

74%

79%

75%

81%

78%

76%

Not

83%

84%

86%

87%

85%

84%

86%

88%

87%

86%

85%

OR/p

CI


0.63***

0.49-0.81
0.78

0.56-1.08
0.61**

0.46-0.82
0.54***

0.40-0.73
0.60***

0.45-0.79
0.54***

0.41-0.72
0.60***

0.46-0.79
0.41***

0.30-0.57
0.67*

0.49-0.92
0.58***

0.43-0.77
0.56***

0.43-0.72

Autonomy—having a voice in the community:

Percentage of people aged 18 years and over who report being satisfied in belonging to their local communityviii
D

50%

57%

59%

59%

57%

61%

57%

49%

59%

56%

59%

Not

61%

64%

65%

66%

64%

65%

68%

69%

66%

69%

69%

OR/p

CI


0.66***

0.53-0.81
0.73**

0.57-0.93
0.76*

0.61-0.95
0.73**

0.58-0.91
0.75**

0.61-0.93
0.84

0.67-1.06
0.62***

0.51-0.76
0.42***

0.33-0.54
0.72**

0.58-0.89
0.56***

0.45-0.69
0.63***

0.52-0.76

Personal Safety


Feelings of safety:

Percentage of people aged 18 years and over who feel unsafe in their local communityix
D

22%

19%

13%

13%

12%

14%

11%

12%

10%

11%

14%

Not

11%

9%

7%

6%

7%

6%

5%

5%

4%

4%

6%

OR/p

CI


2.33***

1.79-3.05
2.32***

1.69-3.19
2.02***

1.44-2.82
2.51***

1.76-3.59
1.84***

1.32-2.58
2.69***

1.88-3.84
2.19***

1.58-3.03
2.87***

1.94-4.26
2.76***

1.89-4.04
3.12***

2.14-4.55
2.54***

1.89-3.42

Victim of personal crime:

Percentage of people aged 18 years and over who report having been the victim of violence in last yearx
D




10%

7%

7%

5%

6%

6%

7%

3%

4%

5%

Not

3%

2%

2%

3%

2%

3%

3%

2%

2%

2%

OR/p

CI


3.55***

2.17-5.80
3.20***

1.91-5.36
2.89***

1.68-4.95
1.74*

1.02-2.97
2.88***

1.64-5.04
2.36**

1.43-3.89
2.47**

1.40-4.35
1.51

0.77-2.96
2.43*

1.30-4.56
2.65***

1.54-4.56

Victim of household crime:

% of people aged 18+ reporting being victim of property crime in last yearxi
D

12%

10%

7%

7%

6%

8%

6%

7%

4%

5%

Not

10%

8%

8%

7%

6%

5%

5%

5%

5%

5%

OR/p

CI


1.29

0.86-1.92
1.16

0.78-1.72
0.81

0.50-1.31
1.02

0.66-1.59
0.94

0.56-1.57
1.61*

1.05-2.45
1.09

0.61-1.95
1.40

0.87-2.27
0.77

0.42-1.42
1.07

0.67-1.72



Multiple & entrench-ed disadvant-age

Multiple disadvantage:

Three or more of six selected areas of disadvantage (covering income, work, health, education, safety & support)xii
D

16%

16%

13%

12%

14%

14%

10%

17%

7%

8%

12%

Not

5%

4%

4%

4%

3%

3%

3%

2%

2%

2%

3%

OR/p

CI


3.65***

2.62-5.10
4.54***

3.03-6.81
3.21***

2.18-4.72
3.31***

2.19-5.01
4.93***

3.30-7.38
5.03***

3.31-7.66
4.40***

2.92-6.63
8.88***

5.61-14.06
3.44***

2.05-5.76
5.12***

8.62


5.39***

3.65-7.97

Multiple disadvantage (excluding health):

Three or more of five selected areas of disadvantage (covering income, work, education, safety & support, but excluding health)
D

11%

10%

8%

8%

8%

10%

6%

12%

6%

4%

8%

Not

4%

3%

3%

4%

2%

2%

2%

1%

2%

1%

2%

OR/p

CI


2.70***

1.85-3.96
3.30***

2.04-5.31
2.70***

1.70-4.31
2.39***

1.49-3.85
3.41***

2.08-5.60
4.89***

2.98-8.03
3.22***

1.97-5.28
9.07***

5.22-15.78
3.82***

2.09-6.99
3.34**

1.73-6.47
4.13***

2.59-6.57

D




9%

7%

8%

12%

16%

6%

14%

8%

4%

5%

Not




2%

2%

2%

2%

1%

1%

2%

1%

1%

1%

OR/p

CI





4.81***

2.57-9.00
4.93***

2.42-10.05
4.24***

1.96-9.14
7.19***

3.37-15.35
12.62***

5.19-30.70
6.68***

2.11-21.12
9.77***

3.14-30.40
5.89*

1.28-27.06
5.87***

2.56-13.45
6.87***

3.14-15.03

D




4%

5%

5%

7%

8%

3%

14%

7%

3%

4%

Not




2%

1%

2%

2%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

OR/p

CI





2.44*

1.08-5.51
3.90**

1.71-8.91
2.75*

1.16-6.65
4.15**

1.71-10.05
9.96***

3.19-31.15
3.85

0.91-16.34
14.73***

4.14-52.38
5.92*

1.29-27.19
5.62**

2.15-14.69
7.10***

2.91-17.30



Multiple & entrench-ed disadvant-age

Entrenched multiple disadvantage:

As above for 2 consecutive years
D




9%

7%

8%

12%

16%

6%

14%

8%

4%

5%

Not

2%

2%

2%

2%

1%

1%

2%

1%

1%

1%

OR/p

CI


4.81***

2.57-9.00
4.93***

2.42-10.05
4.24***

1.96-9.14
7.19***

3.37-15.35
12.62***

5.19-30.70
6.68***

2.11-21.12
9.77***

3.14-30.40
5.89*

1.28-27.06
5.87***

2.56-13.45
6.87***

3.14-15.03

Entrenched Multiple disadvantage (excluding health):

As above for 2 consecutive years
D

4%

5%

5%

7%

8%

3%

14%

7%

3%

4%

Not

2%

1%

2%

2%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

1%

OR/p

CI


2.44*

1.08-5.51
3.90**

1.71-8.91
2.75*

1.16-6.65
4.15**

1.71-10.05
9.96***

3.19-31.15
3.85

0.91-16.34
14.73***

4.14-52.38
5.92*

1.29-27.19
5.62**

2.15-14.69
7.10***

2.91-17.30

D = Disabled young people

Not = Non-disabled young people

OR = Odds ratio

CI = Confidence interval

* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001




  1. ASIB indicator is age range 15-64

  2. ASIB indicator is ‘in the last three months’

  3. ASIB indicator yet to be defined

  4. ASIB indicator based on 5 or more out of 15 items

  5. ASIB indicator also based on employment rate of people with mental health problems

  6. ASIB indicator uses variety of scales and reporting methods

  7. ASIB indicator based on support from ‘persons living outside the household’

  8. ASIB indicator based on people reporting that ‘they have a say in the community on issues that are important to them’

  9. ASIB indicator based on ‘feeling unsafe at home alone or in their local community at night (excluding family violence)’

  10. ASIB indicator based on set of specific crimes

  11. ASIB indicator based on set of specific crimes

  12. Some minor changes made to two of the constituent indicators



1 Reading Figure 1: The bars in Figure 1 show the risk for social exclusion experienced by disabled young Australians when compared to their non-disabled peers. The measure of risk used is the odds ratio (OR). An OR of one indicates that there is no difference between disabled and non-disabled young Australians. An OR of less than one indicates that disabled young Australians are less excluded than their non-disabled peers. An OR of more than one indicates that disabled young Australians are more excluded than their non-disabled peers. An odds ratio of five, for example, indicates that the odds (chances) of exclusion are five times greater for disabled young Australians when compared to their non-disabled peers. The ‘T’ lines show the 95% confidence intervals for each risk estimate. That is, in 95% of instances the true level of risk will lie within these T-lines. If the T lines do not cross 1 (no difference) then the difference between disabled and non-disabled young Australians is considered statistically significant.

Directory: bitstream
bitstream -> How to organise your body 101: postfeminism and the (re)construction of the female body through How to Look Good Naked
bitstream -> College day annual report
bitstream -> A mathematical theory of communication
bitstream -> Images of Fairfax in Modern Literature and Film Andrew Hopper
bitstream -> Amphitheater High School’s Outdoor Classroom: a study in the Application of Design
bitstream -> Ethics of Climate Change: Adopting an Empirical Approach to Moral Concern
bitstream -> The Age of Revolution in the Indian Ocean, Bay of Bengal and South China Sea: a maritime Perspective
bitstream -> Methodism and Culture
bitstream -> Review of coastal ecosystem management to improve the health and resilience of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area
bitstream -> Present state of the area

Download 454.22 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3



The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message
    Main page
well-being
prime minister
task force
australian government
australian government department
approach taken
world health organization
optional protocol
relative risk
social significance
life chances
social inclusion