Competitive negotiation permits bargaining between the procuring entity and prospective contractors before the contract is awarded. This process is used when cost is not the most important factor of evaluation, and typically when:
Sealed bids are not appropriate.
The procuring entity needs to conduct discussion with potential providers because of
differences in laws, regulations, or business practices.
The acquisition is complex or vague.
The procuring entity cannot accurately determine the risks.
The procuring entity is contracting for a production effort (and not a specific item for
delivery).
In general, when engaging in competitive negotiation, procuring entities issue a document to solicit proposals from prospective contractors on how they intend to address the procuring entity’s needs and price quotes for implementing their proposed solutions.
Although most procurement transactions are conducted in a manner that provides open and free competition, there are exceptions, and one of the exceptions is sole-source contracting.
Sole-source contracting is a non-competitive procurement process accomplished through the solicitation of only one source.
Sole-source contracting does not require a bid or quotes, and a sole source purchase does not involve competition among prospective contractors.
Therefore, this method does not provide for full and open competition.
Also, in sole-source procurement, the purchasing entity can negotiate by having back-and forth discussions with the vendor to agree upon technical approach and price.
Additionally, because sole-source contracting does not provide for full and open
competition, organisations that use this form of procurement typically require justification for its use.
For example, in the United States, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the system
of regulations that govern the government’s procurement of goods and services, provides
the following seven reasons that can be invoked to justify procurement through sole-source
contracting: