Public records legislation is designed to ensure that records with ongoing value are destroyed and archives are preserved permanently. Officials may be under the impression that this legislation only applies to paper records; they may even fail to understand that electronic records are indeed records. Officials need to understand that the failure to manage electronic records has major implications for accountability and for efficiency.
Moreover, some of the government’s electronic records are of archival significance and form part of the written record of the past. These records enhance social consciousness and provide a sense of identity and context. Management needs to understand why archives are so important and recognise the organisation’s obligation to future generations under public records legislation. Even in the private sector, internal policies and regulations can be amended to recognise the importance of records and ensure the protection of electronic records.
Priority 4: Identify Existing and Planned Systems
To be credible to senior management, the records manager needs to know the scale of the electronic records management problem in his or her organisation. Implement a survey of existing systems as described in Lesson 4. This will provide the basic facts and figures that will allow you to decide whether the priority needs to lie with ensuring the preservation of existing electronic records, or with the design of future systems.
Priority 5: Assign Adequate Resources
The advantages of relying on electronic records should be set against a realistic appraisal of the resources the organisation can afford to spend on an electronic records management programme. Resources will be needed for the purchase and maintenance of appropriate hardware and software and to ensure there are sufficient numbers of trained personnel to build, support and maintain the electronic records system.
It is essential to co-ordinate computerised systems with associated paper-based systems. Many organisations make the incorrect assumption that computerised systems, especially systems for storing scanned images of documents, will make paper systems unnecessary. Such an assumption is not only incorrect but dangerous, for it may lead to the destruction of critical paper records without adequate safeguards for the protection of electronic records. In most countries in the world, there will continue to be a need to maintain a mixed paper and electronic system for the foreseeable future, for several reasons.
-
It will likely be too expensive to transfer all government information on to a computerised system.
-
Documents received from members of the public or other organisations may be in paper form.
-
There are significant difficulties in protecting the reliability and availability of electronic records over time, as discussed earlier in this module.
-
Power supplies may be unreliable whereas paper systems are usable regardless of the availability of electricity or other sources of power.
-
The original documents may be required in paper form for legal reasons. In many countries, evidence laws do not recognise the legal validity of electronic information even if its security can be guaranteed. Often, for example, the original record carries the authorising signature, which is essential to proving the authenticity of the record.
-
Corruption and fraud in electronic records systems may be difficult to detect because few people will have the technical skills to understand fully how the system operates.
-
Particularly in rural areas, there may be difficulty finding trained staff and local suppliers who can support software and hardware requirements.
-
It may be difficult to finance the maintenance and upgrading of computers or the replacement of obsolete or broken equipment.
-
Appropriate storage facilities and equipment may not be available. For instance, computers and computer-generated information require temperature and humidity controlled environments, and secure back-up storage facilities must be available.
Computer technology is continually changing. Organisations must develop strategies for preserving and providing access to electronic records over time so that all relevant information can be easily retrieved. Only in this way will policy makers and managers have access to the ‘complete picture’ before making a decision. Essentially there are two options for keeping electronic records: store them electronically or print them out. The emerging international recommendation is that records generated electronically should be preserved and accessed electronically. However, the organisation must evaluate the costs involved, the local capacity to store and maintain electronic records safely and the risks involved. If there are doubts in any of these areas, the prudent option is to print the records to paper and file them, so far as this is possible. The catch phrase is ‘when in doubt, print it out.’
In some cases it will be impossible to print out the electronic record to paper. For example, it would be impossible to print out a multi-media document that included electronic links to a video clip or a voice mail message. Thus, printing electronic records to paper and keeping them on paper files is likely to be a transitional or short term tactic. Governments need to ensure that the systems can provide access to records for as long as they are needed for administrative and other purposes.
Priority 8: Contribute to the Design of Systems
In general, the decision to automate parts of a particular administrative function will be taken by management, with technical advice from information technologists. However, records managers within the records and archives institution should contribute to the design of the new system by giving advice on records systems requirements. These requirements are as follows.
-
The information in the existing record-keeping system must be sufficiently reliable that it can be moved to an integrated system safely.
-
Provisions must be in place to support ongoing maintenance of the system, including service contracts, staff and appropriate allocations in the recurrent budget.
-
Well-organised, accurate and easily accessible source data must be available.
-
There needs to be a reliable power supply to ensure the continuous running of the system and reduce data loss cause by power surges.
-
Appropriate back-up and storage procedures and facilities must be available.
-
The electronic and paper records should be stored in appropriate environmental and physically secure conditions.
-
Appropriate standards need to be employed to facilitate the migration of records in the future.
-
All records created by the system should be scheduled for appropriate disposal
-
There must be appropriate management structures to support the operation of the system.
-
Legislation must be in place to support legal admissibility of electronic information if there is no parallel paper system.
-
There needs to be an effective training programme for users and custodians of records.
Share with your friends: |