Databases, design, and organisation


Remote sensing then and now



Download 2 Mb.
Page19/25
Date11.05.2018
Size2 Mb.
#48547
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   25

Remote sensing then and now

Applications







In the setting up of CCRS, not nearly enough attention had been paid to Applications because it was assumed that user departments and the Provinces would almost automatically pick this up, once the data became available. How wrong we were. The reason for the Schopenhauer quote at the beginning of the paper relates to the initial user scepticism and reluctance to invest the time of its engineers and scientists in the technology, even though very little money would be required. Some of the provinces were willing, but when the Federal Government was forced to pull out of sharing the cost of provincial centres, they also backed off. Oceanographers, with the exception of Jim Gower and the U.B.C. Institute of Oceanography generally considered that remote sensing had little to contribute to the science. At the senior level in the Dept. of Agriculture, they felt that there was nothing that remote sensing could tell that the farmer and the earth-bound scientist didn't already know. They did finally contribute the services of Alex Mack, who devoted the rest of his career to agricultural applications and was a great support. At the senior level of the Surveys and Mapping group they found it difficult to believe that the ERTS imagery could assist in any way because of the distortion of the image and the lack of ground resolution compared to aerial photography. However Betty Fleming, a senior photogrammetrist with that group quickly determined that the imagery could be used to up-date the planimetry of 1:250,000 and later 1:50,000 maps at very low cost. She worked with Al Gregory, the president of Gregory Geosciences resulting in this company, using their development of the PROCOM projector was able to save that branch $ 10 M over the course of ten years, (Gauthier, 1991 ). Betty Fleming was also the person who devised the global system indexing the ERTS 'scenes' which became internationally-accepted for remote sensing satellite imagery.

Although the geological exploration people in Canada were the biggest users of ERTS data, the Geological Survey of Canada were reluctant to use the data, just as they had been reluctant in the 1950's to place credibility in photogeology, although they used air photos for maps and navigation through the bush. Roy Slaney of the GSC/Geophysics division laboured for ten years to promote its wider use in the GSC, and in the end did succeed.

The water resources people in Environment Canada were more positive and were very quick to use the facility of ERTS to relay data from ground data platforms, containing stream gauges to a central location. They now have nearly 1000 of these platforms in place throughout Canada.



The sea-ice reconnaissance group at the Atmospheric Environment Centre/Ice Central were very resistant at first to using ERTS data. They considered the data useless unless it could be used to determine the type of ice it was sensing. This they said could only be determined by a trained ice observer. Over the years however they changed their minds and now possess what is probably one of the most up-to-date near realtime operational remote sensing systems in the world. This consists of two long range aircraft with double-sided SAR radar, the use of fast track ERS-1 radar data and a modern central data processing and interpretation centre in Ottawa capable of transmitting the interpreted information in near realtime, directly to the user ships in the Arctic and off the East Coast. One of these aircraft is operated by Intera of Calgary on contract to AES. It does seem to be a pity that all neartime ocean information and remote sensing data which could be used not only for ice reconnaissance but also for search and rescue, fisheries control, environmental monitoring, vessel traffic management and sovereignty control cannot be integrated in operations centres on the East and West coast and in the Canadian Arctic. Problems of departmental mandates and interdepartmental rivalries are difficulties akin to attempting to untie the Gordian knot.



Leo Sayn-Wittgenstein
The foresters were different. The Forest Management Institute and later the Petawawa Forest Research Institute ( after the FMI had been politically axed ), were extremely supportive of the remote sensing program. In fact, without their support, CCRS might never have come into being. Several of their scientists were keenly interested in this technology and have devoted their careers towards it. The present director general of CCRS, Leo Sayn-Wittgenstein was head of the Forest Management Institute at the time. When the FMI was closed down, he set up a successful private company that is still operating, devoted to the application of remote sensing to forestry - Dendron Resources of Ottawa. I have already mentioned the contribution of Victor Zsilinszky, a forester with the Ontario department, who set up the Ontario Centre for Remote Sensing in 1973. Peter Murtha, a forester with UBC was into remote sensing early and was one of the first to set up a remote sensing section in a university. As this paper only covers the early history, I have not mentioned the many younger foresters who are still great contributors to the work.

Reception of Automatic Picture Transmission (APT) cloud data from satellites was already taking place at the Atmospheric Environment Centre in Toronto when CCRS was started, They continually kept in close touch with activities in the National Remote Sensing Program. Their ADMs served on the Interagency Committee on Remote Sensing and their scientists served on the Atmospheric Science Working Group of CACRS for many years. Graham Morrisey served enthusiastically as chairman of the atmospheric working group for many years. This cooperation turned out to be very important as is explained later under the recent splitting of Global Scientific Earth Observation and Operational Remote Sensing as separate disciplines.



Some of the above remarks may seem to have been critical of previous science administrations. They were not made for the purpose of denigrating organizations. The point is that the concept of remote sensing was so revolutionary that there was a natural human resistance to the concept in some quarters. It is interesting to note that one of Phil Lapp's recommendations in his report on 'Observables and Parameters in Remote Sensing' was that "CCRS maintain a social scientist on staff to assist principally with marketing activities and benefit analyses, and to provide a knowledgeable coupling with potential contributions from the soft sciences". Unfortunately, this recommendation was not implemented.

Remote sensing then and now

International Relations











Jean Claude Henein
Within a couple of years of its establishment, CCRS was criticized by some of the provincial representatives on the Advisory Committee for spending too much time and money on the International aspects of remote sensing. Murray Strome and I devoted a lot of efforts in assisting External Affairs and the U. N. in trying to develop an international legal regime for satellite remote sensing. Lee Godby and later Jean Claude Henein spent a lot of effort in Africa trying to get ground stations approved there. CCRS scientists were frequently attending international meetings giving papers, promoting Canadian technology and bringing back important intelligence that was used to guide our future directions. This was a policy I had followed in my previous existence as an exploration geophysicist with the Geological Survey. 'Showing the flag' had been helpful to the Canadian geophysical companies in marketing abroad. In retrospect, this was not a waste of time--quite the opposite! In later years, Canadian companies consistently exported more remote sensing technology than the government spent on remote sensing at home. This was, of course due to the great international marketing effort put forward by the Canadian remote sensing companies, but they all acknowledge the help originally provided by CCRS. Suffice it to say that Canada is now well known as being an important international contributor in all aspects of remote sensing.

I alluded previously to CCRS involvement in the U.N. 'hassles' about the international legal aspects of remote sensing and of the rights of 'sensed nations' to have some control over the data taken by foreign space powers. Murray Strome, played a big role at the U.N.'s 'Peaceful Uses of Outer Space Committee' by serving on an international drafting committee which, after many years of effort, produced a document acceptable to most nations. I shall not go into this further, as it is very complicated and should be the subject of a separate paper.



Remote sensing then and now

The Airborne Operation











CF 100
Cabinet did not give the go-ahead on the airborne program at the same time as the satellite data reception program because the logic of having the two programs together was, at that time, not too obvious to people who were not actually involved in remote sensing. However the fact that the Air Force was so keen on it and that they had offered aircraft and personnel which gave greater credence to the proposal. The Forestry Branch was also very supportive because they were big users of aerial photography and were anxious to branch out into colour and colour IR photography as opposed to having to use the standard black and white photography specified for purposes of topographical mapping. The airborne program would, undoubtedly, not have been approved if the Air Force had not proposed becoming involved because the cost would have been too high. As it was, the Department of Trade and Commerce vigorously opposed the proposal on behalf of private industry quoting the "make or buy" policy. The only way it passed was with the proviso that the operation would be turned over to private industry within two years. The clinching argument by the Air Force was that there were no civilian operating companies that had the expertise to pilot and maintain the CF 100s.

Over the next two years, attempts were made to interest the air survey companies in remote sensing so they would be in a position to take over from the Air Force. At that time, however, the industry was experiencing hard times and the established companies were unwilling to send their technical personnel to working group meetings to learn the technology. There was, however a start-up company by the name of Intera (Editor's note: In 2003 this company is called Intermap Technologies) managed by Bob Holmes of Calgary that owned one Cessna Aircraft. They were interested in remote sensing and were marketing IR scanning surveys for experimental purposes. Bob Holmes was unfortunately killed in an accident with his own aircraft and the company was taken over by a small group of employees led by Brian Bullock, the current president of Intera. When the time came for CCRS to call for tenders on the operation of their aircraft, Intera teamed up with Innotech Aviation of Montreal and underbid a consortium of the air survey companies, winning the bid.



The airborne operation proved to have a wider scope and to be just as difficult and complicated to set up as the satellite operation. In the long run, it also proved, in many ways, to be equally as important as the satellite operation. Aircraft served several purposes. They were able to act as testbeds on which to test and validate new sensors at short notice. They were able to provide special air photographic coverage using colour and false colour imagery to assist in the validation of satellite imagery interpretation. And they were able to acquire high resolution remote sensing data of any kind and of any area, at short notice. Without the aircraft program, we never would have been able to get into the SAR radar technology as quickly as we did. Indeed RADARSAT, the first Canadian remote sensing satellite to be launched early in 1994 would not have been possible without CCRS having been able to 'jump on the SAR radar technology learning curve' so soon by means of the "SAR 580" program which I shall discuss later.



DC-3
From the beginning, in the planning office, we had insisted that it would be folly to have a satellite data reception facility without a parallel airborne program. The difficulty was in getting approval. There was a mandate problem both with the National Aeronautical Establishment and the Department of Transport. They were the only civilian federal government agencies mandated to operate aircraft. The NAE would be prepared to do so, but wanted full scientific control of the missions. The DOT would also do so, but their prices were too high and they were unprepared to make holes in their aircraft and jerry-rig sensor installations for testing. Help came from the Airforce. They had recently disbanded their photo reconnaissance squadron and had surplus aircraft and personnel. Through the efforts of Major E. Gardiner, they offered to transfer two CF-100s for high altitude remote sensing and two DC-3s for low altitude operation and testing of sensors, as well as the use of hangarage for these aircraft. In addition they offered to provide a commanding officer, four pilots, navigators, sensor operators and maintenance mechanics numbering about 35 in all. They were to remain on strength as Airforce personnel, were called the "Airborne Sensing Unit" and DND would be reimbursed from the Remote Sensing Program budget. Sensor engineering and installation designs were to be the responsibility of the future Remote Sensing Centre.

Approval for this plan was given by Cabinet on the understanding that the operation of these aircraft would be handled by a contract to a civilian operator within two years. This did in fact happen and the civilian contract was managed by a partnership arrangement between Innotech Aviation of Montreal and Intera of Calgary. The joint operating company was called 'Intertech'. A hangar was rented from Spartan Air Services and the airborne remote sensing division moved in with the aircraft. Major Gardiner along with several of his pilots and operators when they retired from the Canadian Forces were hired by Innotech to become their remote sensing division based in Ottawa.



The Airborne Remote Sensing Division of CCRS, under the direction of Ralph Baker, modified the two DC-3s by virtually removing the floor of each aircraft and substituting it with re-enforced beams leaving individual 'holes' for up to six downward-looking remote sensing devices. When equipped with tracking cameras and special navigation equipment, they made excellent, cost-effective sensor testing beds. The two CF-100s, although they had a 30,000 ft. operating capability, required flight personnel to wear oxygen masks and besides, their range was very limited. They were soon to be retired.



Falcon Fanjet
By chance, a Falcon Fanjet, owned by an American Company, based in Houston and equipped with several state-of the-art remote sensing devices turned up at Uplands Airport. Obtaining this aircraft for the Remote Sensing Program seemed like a pipe dream until an unprecedented incident took place. Our Treasury Board analyst phoned me and said "Do you want that aircraft?" to which I replied "sure, but I could never raise the money because of all the supplementary budgets we are getting." He said he knew a way to get it and to leave it to him. Within days the aircraft was purchased, delivered and paid for! I never really did know how he accomplished this. I think the money came from the government's contingency fund, but it did get the aircraft program off to a flying start!

Multiple users from government, universities and industry were allowed to use these aircraft for experimental flights if they were able to justify the scientific merit of their proposed experiment. Scheduling was managed by retired Major Ernie Maclaren, a top airborne surveillance officer from the No. 1 Air Division Headquarters in Lahr, Germany.



Supply could not meet the demand and this program not only accelerated the innovation of many new sensors, but also allowed users from all disciplines to acquire detailed airborne data over their test sites--an absolute necessity in validating experimental remote sensing interpretations from satellite data.


Download 2 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   ...   25




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page