Dissertation



Download 2.1 Mb.
Page83/160
Date02.11.2023
Size2.1 Mb.
#62475
1   ...   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   ...   160
Emmanuel FINAL SUBMISSION-2023
Table

Composite

Average Mean

Std. Deviatio n

Table 4.9

Digital Technology Acceptance (DTA)

3.19

1.090

Table 4.10

Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) of technology

2.84

1.118

Table 4.11

User Acceptance (UA)

2.67

1.108

Table 4.12

Quality Assurance Practices (QAP)

3.62

0.895

The summary of Table 4.22 indicates that Quality Assurance Practices (QAP) shows the highest average mean and standard deviation of 3.62 and 1.090, respectively. However, User Acceptance (UA) has the lowest average mean and standard deviation of 2.67 and 0.895, respectively.


    1. PLS-SEM Analysis




Based on the findings from the responses provided the students and lecturers in section 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5, three path models are examined using PLS-SEM. The models focus on predicting attitude of students towards technology (Table 4.22), predicting mode of teaching (Table 4.23) and the effects of user acceptance, quality assurance practices and perceived ease of use on digital technology acceptance (Table 4.23).
Prior to the examination of the three structural models, the constructs reliabilities (Table 4.23), convergent validities (Table 4.24) and discriminant validities (Table 4.21) were assessed (G. W. Cheung et al., 2023; Y. Lin et al., 2020)

Table 4.23 Construct reliability and convergent validity




Download 2.1 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   ...   160




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page