Education public



Download 5.96 Mb.
Page10/29
Date02.06.2018
Size5.96 Mb.
#52723
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   ...   29
15 In Monday's hearing in Washington D.C., a
16 representative from the proprietary school sector noted
17 how the organizations that support the Borrower to
18 Defense and Gainful Employment rules regularly cite ITT
19 Tech and Corinthian, even though those schools are no
20 longer in business. The veterans I have quoted,
21 however, all go to schools that are still in business.
22 Moreover, VES continues to be contacted by
23 plenty of veterans who have had similar issues in
24 schools that still operate. While ITT and Corinthian
25 are, thankfully, no longer around, their business model



1 lives on. Veterans regularly describe to VES aggressive
2 and misleading marketing techniques that various schools
3 use. They describe misrepresentations that schools make
4 about the cost of their education, whether their credits
5 will transfer to other schools.
6 Some describe bait-and-switch tactics that
7 schools use where schools say one thing about the degree
8 requirements when they enroll students, but tell
9 students something different later on, adding to the
10 debt the students must incur. Many also describe how
11 schools make promises about their job prospects upon
12 graduation, but promises that do not bear out, leaving
13 student veterans with no remaining GI Bill and, in many
14 cases, student loan debt that they have no ability to
15 pay.
16 On top of everything else, typically,
17 because of mandatory arbitration clauses, these students
18 are denied access to justices in the courtroom.
19 Meanwhile, veterans who are currently
20 contemplating going to career colleges have the
21 limited -- have limited ability to adequately compare
22 such schools. As a prospective law student, I was able
23 to compare how graduates from different law schools
24 fared at finding jobs and their average starting
25 salaries. It shouldn't be too much to ask the same for



1 other career-focused schools, particularly when you
2 derive so much of the revenue from American taxpayers.
3 Strong career schools should welcome this
4 requirement, given that it will provide them with a tool
5 to better compete against weaker schools. In turn, this
6 should lead to more students and more revenue for good
7 schools, outweighing any associated administrative
8 expense.
9 Veteran organizations have already
10 expressed many of these concerns in writing to the
11 Department of Education. Earlier this year, VES and 30
12 other military and veteran organizations asked the
13 Department to implement the Borrower to Defense rule and
14 to act on the thousands of Borrower to Defense
15 applications pending before the Department, including
16 many that are from veterans.
17 VES has also asked to meet with this
18 Department concerning patterns of fraud towards student
19 veterans that it has identified at certain schools that
20 still exist. None of these requests have been met, nor
21 has this Department continued the regular meetings that
22 the previous Department held with veteran organizations.
23 This lack of support for veterans is beyond
24 disappointing. Nevertheless, we hope and ask that the
25 Department establish a meaningful dialogue with veteran

1 organizations by including them in defrauding student


2 veterans on both of its negotiating committees.
3 Veterans need a government that will stand up for them,
4 just as they stood up for their country. When they
5 leave the Service and are told that their military
6 experience doesn't translate to the civilian world or
7 simply want to add to their knowledge and skill set,
8 they need schools that see them as more than dollar
9 signs. They need schools that respect their service,
10 recognize their talent and drive and truly prepare for
11 their next phase of their life so they can continue to
12 lead at home, just as they did in the uniform. Thank
13 you.
14 MR. MANNING: Thank you. I might also just
15 add that we have offices at the Department that are
16 willing and ready to work with veterans, and I'll put
17 you in touch with them.
18 MR. MARTIN: Is Adrian Shelley here?
19 MR. SHELLEY: Good morning. Thank you for
20 the opportunity to deliver comments today and welcome to
21 Texas.
22 MR. MANNING: Thank you.
23 MR. SHELLEY: My name is Adrian Shelley.
24 I'm the Director of the Office of Public Citizen in
25 Texas. Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer



1 organization headquartered in Washington D.C., and we
2 were deeply involved in both the development and legal
3 defense of the Borrower Defense rule and the Gainful
4 Employment rule. We also delivered comments in
5 Washington on Monday, and our comments will be submitted
6 in writing as well.
7 The adoption of both of these rules was an
8 important step in the crackdown on predatory schools,
9 most of those schools being clustered within the
10 for-profit industry. These schools rely on federal
11 student aid and fleece their students with low-value
12 educations. Some of these schools essentially rely on
13 fraud as a business model, to the detriment of their
14 students and to the taxpayers who fund student aid
15 programs.
16 The Department is taking a shameful step
17 backwards here by initiating a new negotiated rulemaking
18 to revisit these rules and by unlawfully delaying key
19 provisions in the meantime. Texas has students who are
20 going to pay the price for these delays, as do other
21 states around the nation.
22 I want to focus, though, in particular, on
23 the continued need for arbitration and class-action
24 waiver provisions in the Borrower Defense rule. I am
25 going to refer to an example from ITT Tech, and although




Download 5.96 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   ...   29




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page