Evergreen Valley College Program Review Self-Study Document Criteria
AREA C: ARTS, LITERATURE, PHILOSOPHY, FOREIGN LANGUAGES
Download 411.63 Kb.
|
AREA C: ARTS, LITERATURE, PHILOSOPHY, FOREIGN LANGUAGESMinimum 9 units (One course from each area) C1 ARTArt 90, 91, 92, 93, Drama 13A, 23, 40, Music 8A, 8B, 83, 90, 91, 92, 95, 99 C2 HUMANITIES (LITERATURE, PHILOSOPHY & FOREIGN LANGUAGES) English 1B, 21, 28, 33, 35, 60, 62, 73, 80, 82A, 82B, 84A, 84B, 86A, 86B, French 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, Humanities 2, Interdisciplinary Studies 70, 96, 97, Sign Language 1A, 1B, Spanish 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 20A Philosophy 10, 11, 12, 65, 70 AREA D: SOCIAL, POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS AND BEHAVIOR; HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Minimum 9 units (at least one course from 2 categories) D1 ANTHROPOLOGY AND ARCHEOLOGY Anthropology 62, 63, Social Science 20, 28, 30, 40, 42 D2 ECONOMICS Students may satisfy the History & Institutions requirement by taking: History 17A and 17B OR History 1 and Political Science 1 Economics 10A, 10B D3 ETHNIC STUDIES English 60, 80, 82A, 82B, History 21, 22, 23, Social Science 20, 28, 30, 40, 42
English 33, Sociology 96 D5 GEOGRAPHY Geography 10, 11 D6 HISTORY History 1, 5, 10A, 10B, 17A, 17B, 21, 22, 23, 35 D7 INTERDISCIPLINARY SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE Engineering 1, Interdisciplinary Studies 1, 10, Journalism 10, FCS 60, Social Science 50 D8 POLITICAL SCIENCE, GOVERNMENT, AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS Interdisciplinary Studies 90, Political Science 1 D9 PSYCHOLOGY Family Consumer Studies 70, Psychology 1, 35, 47, 60, 92, 93, 96, 99, 100 D0 SOCIOLOGY AND CRIMINOLOGY AJ 10, 11, 14, Social Science 25, Sociology 10, 11, 15, 20 AREA E: LIFELONG UNDERSTANDING AND SELF-DEVELOPMENT 3 units Family Consumer Studies 19, 50, 60, Health Ed 11, Interdisciplinary Studies 70, P.E. 31, Psychology 35, 60, 96, 100, (If a 2 unit non-physical course has been taken in this area, a physical activity course for 1 unit may be used to satisfy the 3 units) Appendix E EVC English Major Data Graphs and Analysis (Spring 2009 to Spring 2011) Figure 01: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: Gender (Numerical) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 02: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: Gender (Percentage) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 03: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: English AA Track Gender (Numerical) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 04: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: English AA Transfer Track Gender (Percentage) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 05: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: English Transfer vs. AA—Female (Numerical) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 06: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: English Transfer vs. AA--Male (Numerical) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 07: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: Aggregated Gender & Ethnicity (Numerical) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Graph Figure 08: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: Aggregated Gender & Ethnicity (Numerical) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Graph Figure 09: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: Aggregated Gender & Ethnicity (Numerical) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 010: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: Transfer/AA Comparison—Gender & Ethnicity (Percentage) Fall 2009-Spring 2011
Alternate Transfer/AA Comparison—Gender & Ethnicity (Percentage) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Figure 012: Snapshot of EVC English Majors: Transfer/AA Track Comparison Gender & Ethnicity (Percentage) Fall 2009-Spring 2011 Appendix F: EVC English Majors Flyer Revised Version (forthcoming) Appendix G: Mixed Data from the SJECCD District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: 2005-2007 
Figure 1. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Seat Count (Numerical) 2005-2006 
Figure 2. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Seat Count (Percentage) 2005-2007 
Figure 3. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Seat Count (Changes) 2005-2006 
Figure 4. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Retention (Numerical) 2005-2006 
Figure 5. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Retention (Percentage) 2005-2006 
Figure 6. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Success (Numerical) 2005-2006 
Figure 7. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Success (Percentage) 2005-2006 
Figure 8. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: (Changes) Fall 2005-Fall 2006 
Figure 9. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Retention (Percentage) Fall 2005-Fall 2006 Appendix H: Mixed Data from the SJECCD District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: 2007-2009 
Figure 10. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Success (Numerical Fall 2007-Fall 2008 
Figure 11. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Success (Percentage) Fall 2007-Fall 2008 
Figure 12. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: (Changes) Fall 2007-Fall 2008 
Figure 13. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Seat Count (Numerical) Spring 2008-Spring 2009 
Figure 14. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Seat Count (Percentage) Spring 2008-Spring 2009 
Figure 15. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Retention (Numerical) Fall 2005-Fall 2006 
Figure 16. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Retention (Percentage) Spring 2008-Spring 2009 
Figure 17. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Success (Numerical) Spring 2008-Spring 2009 
Figure 18. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Success (Percentage) Spring 2008-Spring 2009 
Figure 19. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: (Seat Count) Spring 2008-Spring 2009 
Figure 20. Mixed Data from the District Office Comparing Grouped Ethnicities vs. Disaggregated Ethnic Groups: Retention & Success (Numerical) Fall 2009 Appendix J: Aggregated Date Comparing Grouped Ethnicities: 2005-2007* Appendix K: Aggregated Date Comparing Grouped Ethnicities: 2007-2009* Appendix L: Aggregated Date Comparing Grouped Ethnicities: 2007-2009* Note regarding Appendix J, K, and L: Charts, Graphs and Analysis Derived From Aggregated/Grouped Ethnicities, Will Be Added to the 2010/2011 English Program Review During the Summer 2011
Directory: academicaffairs -> documents academicaffairs -> P higher Education Coordinating Commission roposal for a New Academic Program Institution: College/School: Department/Program: Proposed Degree and Title academicaffairs -> Indiana state university provost report to the campus academicaffairs -> Program Prioritization Initial Ratings and Rankings documents -> Accounting Program Review, 2011 Evergreen Valley College academicaffairs -> Lea consolidated Application District Code academicaffairs -> Executive Summary – Full Template Utah Valley University Bachelor of Fine Arts in Theatre Arts documents -> Evergreen valley college documents -> Summary of department/program summary of Program documents -> Evergreen Valley College Table of Contents Download 411.63 Kb. Share with your friends:
|