External technology acquisition; Catching-up; Innovation performance; Chinese auto firms



Download 128.45 Kb.
Page3/3
Date20.10.2016
Size128.45 Kb.
#5575
1   2   3

Conclusions

Technological catching-up process in NIEs is different from technology development in advanced countries, which requires synthetic views (Kim, 1980; Lee et al., 1988). Technology development in NIEs normally comes from external technology acquisition rather than internal R&D. This study also highlights these implications: first, latecomer firms should acquire certain technology from outside to accumulate technological capability fast and effectively due to product lifecycle shortening and continuous changing technology environment. Evidence from GEELY’s technological capability growth shows that although lack of capital, technology and policy support, adopting proper strategies of external technology acquisition to integrate with sustaining internal R&D efforts, still make a latecomer auto firm obtain a certain extent of technological capability in a short time.

Second, in a broader perspective, integrating different streams of technological knowledge is becoming crucial to innovation in an era of technology rapidly changing for a firm (even a large company). The need for increased differentiation in technology acquisition and its increased application integration make technology markets more important (Ahuja and Katila, 2001; Grant, 1996). GEELY’s practice demonstrates that choosing appropriate technology acquisition strategies at different development stages according to different international circumstances is also crucial for latecomer firms to catch up with leaders, such as utilizing cooperative R&D at the moment of improving production capability, starting M&A from small and medium companies to large corporations after possessing basic absorptive capacity of technology and experience of international management.

Moreover, in accordance with studies on technology acquisition and technological performance relationships, this research also proves that matching technologies acquired externally with internally developed capability improves technological performance of latecomer auto firms significantly. Instead of excluding its commitment on in-house R&D activities, GEELY sees external technology acquisition as a means of complementing and leveraging its development capability. Firms should not rely on external technology acquisition completely to substitute internal input accumulation over time. Otherwise, as latecomer firms, technological innovation will never be realized, as well as competitiveness on market.

With some enormous environmental changes from that of Korean and Japanese latecomer firms’ catching-up era, namely technology leaders’ growing reluctance technology transfer, emergence of various standardization, shortening of technology/product life cycles and phenomena of technology fusion, this paper seeks to provide useful insights and lessons to companies of other NIEs by illuminating how a Chinese auto firm is able to accumulate technological capability in a short time. Incidentally, the advantage of single case studies is to track development process to prove or build a theory. But there still exists generalizability limitations too, as the experiences in a single company may not fully cover those could have happened in other companies. Further empirical research is necessary to examine related findings in different industries and companies.



Reference

Ahuja, G., Katila, R., 2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal 22 (3), 197-220.

Akarakiri, J. B., 1998. Equipment leasing: A strategy for technology acquisition in Nigeria. Technovation 18 (5), 347-352.

Alp, N., Alp, B., Omurtag, Y., 1997. The influence of decision makers for new technology acquisition. Computers & Industrial Engineering 33 (1), 3-5.

Alp, N., Alp, B., Omurtag, Y. 1997. Technology acquisition and utilization in metal goods, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Portland, OR.

Atuahene-Gima, K., 1993. Determinants of inward technology licensing intensions: an empirical analysis of Australian engineering firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (3), 230-240.

Awny, M. M., 2005. Technology transfer and implementation processes in developing countries. International Journal of Technology Management 32 (1), 213-220.

Caloghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., Tsakanikas, A., 2004. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation 24 (1), 29-39.

Capon, N., Glazer, R., 1987. Marketing and technology: a strategic coalignment. Journal of Marketing 51 (3), 1-14.

Chaudhuri, S., 2004. Can innovation be bought? Managing acquisitions in dynamic environments. Harvard University.

Chesbrough, H., 2006. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Chesbrough, H., Crowther, A., 2006. Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management 36 (3), 229-236.

Chiesa, V., Manzini, R., Tecilla, F., 2000. Selecting sourcing strategies for technological innovation: an empirical case study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20 (9), 1017-1037.

Cho, D., Yu, P., 2000. Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: an empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in the Korean telecommunication industry. Technovation 20 (12), 691-704.

Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A., 1989. Innovation and learning: the tow faces of R&D. the Economic Journal 99 (9), 569-596.

Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128-152.

Daim, T. U., Kocaoglu, D. F., 2008. Exploring technology acquisition in Oregon, Turkey and in the U.S. electronics manufacturing companies. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 19 (1), 45-58.

Dill, D. D., 1990. University/industry research collaborations: An analysis of inter-organizational relationships. R&D Management 20 (2), 123-130.

Dutrénit, G., 2000. Learning and knowledge Management in the Firm: from Knowledge Accumulation to Strategic Capabilities. Edward Elgar Publishing, Massachusetts.

Duysters, G., Hagedoorn, J., 2000. Core competences and company performance in the world-wide computer industry. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 11 (1), 75-91.

Fan, P., 2006. Catching up through developing innovation capability: evidence from China’s telecom-equipment industry. Technovation 26 (3), 359-369.

Gagnon, R. J., Sheu, C., 2003. Acquiring advanced engineering technologies under conditions of performance improvement. Computers & Industrial Engineering 45 (3), 393-416.

Gallagher, Parker., 2002. Innovation and competition in standard-based industries: a historical analysis of the US home video game market. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49 (5), 67-82.

Gil, Y., Bong, S., Lee, J., 2003. Integration model of technology internalization modes and learning strategy: globally late starter Samsung's successful practices in South Korea. Technovation 23 (4), 333-347.

Girma, S., 2005. Technology transfer from acquisition FDI and the absorptive capacity of domestic firms: an empirical investigation. Open economies review 16 (2), 175-187.

Granstrand, O., 2004. The economics and management of technology trade: Towards a pro-licensing era? International Journal of Technology Management 27 (2), 209-240.

Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C., Sjöberg, N., 1992. External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. R&D Management 22 (2), 111-133.

Grant, R. M., 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7 (4), 375-387.

Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G., 2002. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high tech environment. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 14 (1), 67-82.

Hemmert, M., 2004. The influence of institutional factors on the technology acquisition performance of high-tech firms: survey results from Germany and Japan. Research Policy 33 (6/7), 1019-1040.

Henderson, R., Cockburn, I., 1996. Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. The RAND Journal of Economics 27 (1), 32-59.

Hobday, M., 2005. Firm-level innovation models: perspectives on research in developed and developing countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (2), 121-146.

Hobday, M., 1995. East Asian latecomer firms: learning the technology of electronics. World Development 23 (7), 1171-1193.

Hobday, M., 1994. Export-led technology development in the four dragons: the case of electronics. Development and Change 25 (2), 333-361.

Hung, S., Tang, R., 2008. Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Technovation 28 (9), 551-563.

James, A. D., Georghiou, L., Metcalfe, J. S., 1998. Integrating technology into merger and acquisition decision making. Technovation 18 (8), 563-573.

Jones, G. K., Lanctot Jr., A., Teegen, H. J., 2001. Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. Journal of Business Venturing 16 (3), 255-283.

Kamala, G. V., Swamy, K., 1985. A model for small-scale industry/university collaboration in the UK based on case studies. R&D Management 15 (1), 41-50.

Katz, J. M., 1984. Domestic technological innovations and dynamic comparative advantage: further reflections on a comparative case-study program. Journal of Development Economics 16 (1-2), 13-37.

Killing, P., 1980. Technology acquisition: license agreement or joint venture. Columbia Journal of World Business, 38-46.

Kim, L., 1980. Stages of development of industrial technology in a developing country: a model. Research Policy 22 (2), 105.

Kim, L., 1997. Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Kim, L., 2001. The dynamics of technological learning in industrialisation. International Social Science Journal 53 (168), 297-308.

Kim, S. G., Ro, K. K., 1995. A strategic technology management model under different technology acquisition modes between developing countries: the case of telecommunications in Korea and China. International Journal of Technology Management 10 (7), 767-776.

Kim, W., Seong, J., 2010. Catching‐up and post catching‐up strategies of latecomer firms: evidence from Samsung semiconductor. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 18 (2), 115-142.

Kiyota, K., Okazaki, T., 2005. Foreign technology acquisition policy and firm performance in Japan, 1957–1970: Micro-aspects of industrial policy. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23 (7-8), 563-586.

Koc, T., Ceylan, C., 2007. Factors impacting the innovative capacity in large-scale companies. Technovation 27 (3), 105-114.

Lall, S., 1980. Developing countries as exports of industrial technology. Research Policy 9 (1), 24-52.

Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., 1997. Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (2), 102-116.

Lee, J., Bae, Z., Lee, J., 1994. Strategic management of a large-scale technology development: The case of the Korean telecommunications industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 11 (2), 149-170.

Lee, J., Bae, Z., Choi, D., 1988. Technology development processes: A model for a developing country with a global perspective. R&D Management 18 (3), 235-250.

Lee, K., Lim, C., 2001. Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy 30 (3), 459-483.

Lichtenthaler, U., Lichtenthaler, E., 2004. Organization of international external technology acquisition projects. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization 3 (3), 291-307.

Lopez-Martinez, R. E., Medelin, E., Scanlon, A. P., Solerio, J. L., 1994. Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation: A Mexican case. R&D Management 24 (1), 17-32.

Lowe, J., Taylor, P., 1998. R&D technology purchase through license agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets. R&D Management 28 (4), 263-278.

Lynn., 1998. The commercialization of the transistor radio in Japan: the functioning of an innovation community. IEEE, Transactions on Engineering Management 45 (8), 220-229.

Montoya, P. V., Zárate, R. S., Martín, L. Á. G., 2007. Does the technological sourcing decision matter? Evidence from Spanish panel data. R&D Management 37 (2), 161-172.

Mowery, D., Oxley, J., Silverman, B., 1996. Strategic alliances and inter-firm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1), 77-91.

Nakamura, K., Odagiri, H., 2005. R&D boundaries of the firm: An estimation of the double-hurdle model on commissioned R&D, joint R&D, and licensing in Japan. Economics of Innovation & New Technology 14 (7), 583-615.

Narayanan, K., 1998. Technology acquisition, de-regulation and competitiveness: a study of Indian automobile industry. Research Policy (27), 215-228.

Narula, R., 2001. Choosing between internal and non-internal R&D activities: some technological and economic factors. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 13 (3), 365-387.

Newey, L. R., Shulman, A. D., 2004. System absorptive capacity: creating early-to-market returns through R&D alliances. R&D Management 34 (5), 495-504.

Noori, H., 1990. Managing the dynamics of new technology: Issues in manufacturing management. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

OECD. 1992. Technology and Economy: The Key Relationships. Paris: OECD.

Pack, H., 2001. The role of acquisition of foreign technology in Taiwanese growth. Industrial & Corporate Change 10 (3), 713-734.

Park, B. I., 2011. Knowledge transfer capacity of multinational enterprises and technology acquisition in international joint ventures. International Business Review 20 (1), 75-87.

Perez, C., 1985. Microelectronics, long waves and world structural change: new perspectives for developing countries. World Development 13 (3), 441-463.

Perez, C. 1988. New Technologies and Development. In C. Freeman, & B. Lundvall (Eds.), Small Countries Facing the Technological Revolution. London and New York: Printer Publishers.

Poon, J. P. H., MacPherson, A., 2005. Technology acquisition among Korean and Taiwanese firms in the United States. International Business Review 14 (5), 559-575.

Rothwell, R., 1992. Successful industrial innovation: Critical factors for the 1990s. R&D Management 22 (3), 221-239.

Sen, F., Rubenstein, A. H., 1990. An exploration of factors affecting the integration of in-house R&D with external technological acquisition strategies of a firm. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management 37 (4), 246-258.

Song, M., Bij, H. V. D., Weggeman, M., 2005. Determinants of level of knowledge application: a knowledge based and information-processing perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 (5), 430-444.

Stewart, F. 1979. International technology transfer: issues and policy options, World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 344.

Swan, K. S., Allred, B. B., 2003. A product and process model of the technology-sourcing decision. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20 (6), 485-496.

Toshikawa, T., 2003. Technology development and acquisition strategy. International Journal of Technology Management 25 (6), 666-674.

Tsai, K., Wang, J., 2007. Inward technology licensing and firm performance: a longitudinal study. R&D Management 32 (2), 151-160.

Tsai, K., Wang, J., 2008. External technology acquisition and firm performance: a longitudinal study. Journal of Business Venturing 23 (1), 91-112.

Tsai, K., Wang, J., 2009. External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: An analysis based on the Taiwanese Technological Innovation Survey. Research Policy 38 (3), 518-526.

Utterback, J. M., Abernathy, W. J., 1975. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega-Int J Manage S 3 (6), 639-656.

Vanhaverbeke, W., Beerkens, B., Duysters, G. 2004. Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology-based alliance networks, Academy of Management Best Conference Paper.

Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Noorderhaven, N., 2002. External Technology Sourcing through Alliances or Acquisitions: An Analysis of the Application-Specific Integrated Circuits Industry. Organization Science 13 (6), 714-733.

Venanzi, D., 1996. A new approach to the identification and selection of international technology transfer modes logical framework and empirical evidence. Technovation 16 (6), 287-300.

Veugelers, R., 1997. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research policy 26 (3), 303-315.

Veugelersa, R., Cassiman, B., 1999. Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Research Policy 28 (1), 63-80.

Westphal, L. E., Kim, L., Dahlman, C. J. 1985. Reflections on Acquisition of Technological Capability. In N. Rosenberg, & C. Frischtak (Eds.), International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparisons. New York: Pagamon.

Yin, R. K., 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE Publications Inc, California.

Yoshikawa, T., 2003. Technology development and acquisition strategy. International Journal of Technology Management 25 (6), 666-674.

Zahra, S. A., Keil, T., Maula, M., 2005. New ventures’ inward licensing: examining the effects of industry and strategy characteristics. European Management Review 2 (3), 154-166.



Ziedonis, R. H., 2004. Don’t fence me in: fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Science 50 (6), 804-820.

Download 128.45 Kb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page