Future scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions from electric and conventional vehicles in Australia



Download 0.6 Mb.
Page2/6
Date20.05.2018
Size0.6 Mb.
#49493
1   2   3   4   5   6

2.3 Driving intensity

Figure 3 shows the three scenarios of driving intensity. The driving intensity of 14,000 km/year is approximately that of the average Australian light vehicle since 1997 (Australian Bureau of Statistics 1998-2015). The declining driving intensity is a pattern, scaled from Das (2000) and Ungureanu et al. (2007), that has new cars driving at above-average intensity, old cars driving at below-average intensity, and an average driving intensity of 14,000 km/year over a 20 year useful lifetime. The driving intensity of 10,000 km/year represents a plausible lower in a scenario of high traffic congestion, high urbanisation, and low car ownership. The driving cycles of both vehicles are assumed to be identical, despite the EV’s driving range being five times shorter than that of the CV.



Figure 3: Driving intensities of a conventional vehicle and an electric vehicle



2.4 Useful lifetime

The study considers two scenarios of useful lifetime. The useful lifetime of 20 years is that of the average Australian light vehicle (Climate Change Authority 2014). The useful lifetime of 10.7 years is the value that, at a driving intensity of 14,000 km/year, gives the 150,000 km useful distance assumed by Hawkins et al. (2013) and Sharma et al. (2013).



3. Results

Figures 4-6 show the total use-stage GHG emissions of the CV and EV under selected scenarios. Figure 7-9 show the total use-stage GHG emissions benefit of the EV over the CV under the scenarios. CV (Business as Usual) and EV (Business as Usual) have consistent assumptions, CV (GHG Target High) and EV (Carbon Price Base) have consistent assumptions, and EV (Carbon Price High) is an outlying but plausible result.

In Figures 4-9, data is represented as a line for clarity, but each year’s results should be considered columns because the data represent discrete values rather than continuous values. For example, Figure 4 shows that, over its 20-year useful lifetime, a 2010 CV is responsible for 67 tonnes CO2-e and a 2015 CV is responsible for 60 tonnes CO2-e.

The results show that, under all scenarios, an EV manufactured in any year from 2010-2030 will be responsible for fewer GHG emissions than the equivalent CV from driving. The benefit declines steadily with later models because improvements in CV aim to decrease fuel consumption whereas improvements in EVs aim to increase driving range.



The results also show that the driving intensity and useful lifetime affect the EV benefit. A decrease in driving intensity causes a proportional decrease in benefit. A change in driving intensity from a constant value to a declining value causes a small decrease in benefit because the EV is driven more intensively while the GHG intensity of electricity generation is higher. A decrease in useful lifetime causes a near-proportional decrease in benefit, but there is a small increase in benefit due to an individual EV’s GHG intensity declining while the comparable CV’s GHG intensity remains constant.

Figure 4: Total use-stage GHG emissions of a conventional vehicle and an electric vehicle driven 14,000 km/year for 20 years



Directory: papers -> 2016 -> files
papers -> Prospects for Basic Income in Developing Countries: a comparative Analysis of Welfare Regimes in the South
papers -> Weather regime transitions and the interannual variability of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Part I: a likely connection
papers -> Fast Truncated Multiplication for Cryptographic Applications
papers -> Reflections on the Industrial Revolution in Britain: William Blake and J. M. W. Turner
papers -> This is the first tpb on this product
papers -> Basic aspects of hurricanes for technology faculty in the United States
papers -> Title Software based Remote Attestation: measuring integrity of user applications and kernels Authors
files -> Capacitate​d traffic assignment problem subject to variable demand, a nonlinear formulation cum solution code in gams
files -> Large scale multiclass modelling for addressing the challenges, opportunities and future trends of new urban transport systems
files -> Road User Pricing: Driverless cars, congestion and policy responses

Download 0.6 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4   5   6




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page