3.3.1Global prevalence for adults
Due to the use of different approaches to measure and identify persons with disability during data collection exercises, there are several distinct estimates of disability prevalence. In addition, as disability is a continuum (see section 3.1 ‘Defining disability’), even if the same questions are used to identify persons with disabilities different cut-off thresholds used to identify people with disabilities will lead to different estimates of disability prevalence.
In 2011, the WHO/World Bank’s World Disability Report gathered data from 59 countries collected through the World Health Surveys in 2002-2004 that included a functioning approach. The report found that the global prevalence of disability was 16%, ranging from 12% in higher income countries to 18% in lower income countries (Table ). A third set of estimates derived from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2004 update used a different methodology that yielded an estimate of 19%.26,46 The Washington Group questions (see section 3.2) tend to lead to lower estimates at the country level (Error: Reference source not found). Research has shown that these questions leave out those with minor or moderate disabilities, but they identify those with significant disabilities.47
Table . Estimates of global disability prevalence for adults
Data source
|
Global prevalence
|
World Health Surveys, 2002-200426
|
16%48
|
Global Burden of Disease Study, 200445
|
19%49,50
|
Table . Disability Prevalence Using the Washington Group Questions, by Data Instrument and Year
Country
|
Type of source
|
Year
|
Prevalence Rate
|
Aruba
|
Census
|
2010
|
7%
|
Israel
|
Census
|
2008
|
6%
|
Maldives
|
Survey
|
2009
|
10%
|
United States
|
Survey
|
2013
|
10%
|
Zambia
|
Survey
|
2006
|
9%
|
Source: Loeb (2015).51
3.3.2Prevalence in children
Estimating disability prevalence for children poses even greater challenges than for adults as it is difficult to differentiate between natural development delays and disabilities. Some global and country studies point to prevalence estimates around 6% (see Table ), but estimates vary widely depending on the method used. A detailed study in the United States that took a functional approach to defining disability found that the disability prevalence rate of the under age 18 population was 7%.52 A more recent study in the United Kingdom pointed to 7% disability prevalence among those aged 18 or under.53 In six countries included in the Developmental Difficulties in Early Childhood Survey, the prevalence of developmental difficulties in young children ranged from 5% to 12%.54
Although at the global level, disability prevalence was found to be similar for girls and boys, 45 some national studies point to higher prevalence in boys than in girls (Figure 1). In the United States, boys had a higher rate of disability, 8%, than girls, 5%. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, 9% of boys and 6% of girls had a disability; in New Zealand, 13% of boys and 9% of girls had a disability and in Australia, 10% of boys and 6% of girls had a disability.
Table . Estimates of disability prevalence for children
Geographical coverage
|
Data source
|
Year
|
Age group
|
Prevalence Rate
|
World
|
Global Burden of Disease Study, 200445
|
2004
|
0-14
|
5%55
|
Australia
|
Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers56
|
2003
|
0-14
|
8%
|
New Zealand
|
National household surveys57
|
2001
|
0-14
|
11%
|
United Kingdom
|
Blackburn et al (2010)52
|
2004-5
|
0-18
|
7%
|
United States
|
Newachek and Haflon (1998)51
|
1992-4
|
0-17
|
7%
|
Note: As the data from the different sources used different methods to collect data on persons with disabilities, these data are not internationally comparable.
Figure . Disability prevalence among boys and girls
Note: As countries use different methods to collect data on persons with disabilities, these data are not internationally comparable. Despite these differences in methodology, there is a consistent gap across countries on school attendance for youth with and without disabilities.
Sources: Australia: Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers, 2003;55 New Zealand: National household surveys;56 UK: Blackburn et al (2010);52 US: Newachek and Haflon (1998).51
3.3.3Prevalence among older persons
The highest rates of disability are among older persons. For example, in Sri Lanka in 2001 only 7% of the general population is 65 years or older but they make up 23% of the disabled population.58 In Australia, in 2003, those percentages are 11 and 35, respectively.57
Overall, age is associated with disability and the age/disability gradient becomes quite steep as people age in both higher and lower income countries (Table ).26,59 Data from Canada, shows how fast disability prevalence can increase as people get older (Figure ). Older women tend to have higher rates of disability than older men. In 59 countries, in 2002-4, the differences between disability rates of those ages 65+ were ten percentage points higher for women than for men.57
Table . Disability prevalence, by age and income level, in 59 countries, 2002-4
Source: WHO and World Bank (2011),26 p. 28.
Figure . Disability prevalence, by age, Canada, 2006
Source: Stone (2014).60
3.3.4Prevalence by sex
While studies have suggested that disability prevalence is higher among boys than girls (see section above on prevalence for children), for adults the inverse is observed: 12% of women aged 18 or over have at least one severe functional limitation compared to only 8% of men.61 Even looking at moderate limitations, there is still a gender gap of 14% to 11%. Sometimes the gender gap is attributed at least in part to the fact that women live longer and are thus more likely to become disabled in old age, but looking only at working age adults the gap remains: 10% to 7% for a severe limitation and 13% to 10% for a minor one. The gender gap in disability prevalence is highest for the older population, where 44% of women have a disability, compared to 34% of men.
3.3.5Urban versus rural
Evidence suggests that the rate of disability is slightly higher in rural areas than in urban areas, probably because poverty rates are higher and access to health care is lower. Using data from 59 countries, in 2002-4 the prevalence rate in rural areas has been estimated at 16% and in urban areas at 15%.26 Some individual country studies support these findings. In a study in Bangladesh, it was found that after controlling for wealth, age, sex, education, marital status, and district, people in rural areas were about 12% more likely to have a disability62. A 2009 study showed disability was higher in rural areas of India, as well.63 However, country data suggests that in some countries prevalence is higher in urban areas while in others prevalence is higher in rural areas (see Figure in section 4.3.2 ‘Persons with disabilities in human settlements and urban development’).
3.3.6Prevalence by type of disability
People with different types of disability – for example physical disabilities versus cognitive disabilities – may experience different barriers, and also different causes of disability. Therefore, it is useful to have a breakdown by type of disability. Figure shows data on type of disability for working age adults64. Difficulties with self-care are the least prevalent, as expected, because they represent the people with the most severe limitations. Across regions, difficulties with mobility and mental functioning (concentrating and remembering) are more prevalent than difficulties with seeing, except for the Americas where the prevalence is similar.
Figure shows the prevalence of different types of disabilities for older adults. The prevalence rates across all categories of disability are higher than for working age adults, including for severe disabilities associated with difficulties in self-care. Compared to people who are working age, seeing difficulties become more prominent in old age in all regions except Europe.
Figure . Disability prevalence for working age adults, by type of disability, in 54 countries, 2002-465
Source: Author’s elaboration based on data in Mitra and Sambamoorthi (2013).60
Figure . Disability prevalence for older persons, by type of disability, in 54 countries, 2002-464
Source: Author’s elaboration based on data in Mitra and Sambamoorthi (2013). 60
Share with your friends: |