Gulf War Air Power Survey


Table 33 Intermediate-Level and Heavy-Maintenance Production



Download 5.55 Mb.
Page27/61
Date26.11.2017
Size5.55 Mb.
#35436
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   61

Table 33

Intermediate-Level and Heavy-Maintenance Production

August 1990 - March 1991683


Product

Andersen

Moron

B-52 Phase Inspections

28

19

KC-135 Phase Inspections

0

59

B-52G Engine Changes

122

20

KC-135 Engine Changes

0

11

B-52 Wash and Corrosion Control

60

19

KC-135 Wash and Corro­sion Control

0

90

Repaired line and shop re­place­able units

4,076

2,935


Strategic Airlift Maintenance
The Military Airlift Command maintenance concept was fundamen­tally different from that of either Tactical Air Command or Strategic Air Com­mand and also changed little between peacetime and wartime. Inter­mediate and heavy maintenance of C-5 and C-141 aircraft was centralized at home stations on the east and west coast of the United States. The Military Airlift Command's C-5 and C-141 maintenance cycle for repair­able compo­nents during Desert Shield and Desert Storm is illustrated on Figure 67. As was true in peacetime, forward operating locations did not have inter­mediate repair capability; that capability was provided by Dover AFB for the C-5 and McGuire AFB for the C-141. Overall reparable asset flow times were comparable to those of peacetime and are summarized in Table 34 for the C-5 and Table 35 for the C-141. The main purpose of pre­senting the data is that they provide one measure of the routine resup­ply and other logistics cycle times achievable when operational aircraft and their intermediate maintenance are in different theaters. Note that the resupply times achieved by Desert Express (seven­ty-two hours) are signif­icantly better than those of either the C-5 or C-141.
Of equal importance with cycle times are failures experienced versus failures planned for. If “planned for” is taken to be the supply items in the War Readiness Spares Kits plus base-level self-sufficiency spares, there was only a partial match. For the C-5, for example, thirty-six to thirty-nine percent of the items in kits were not in demand at any time during Desert Shield or Desert Storm.
Military Airlift's C-141 and C-5 aircraft operated under an iso­chro­nally (i.e., equally spaced time intervals) scheduled maintenance con­cept, with home station checks every 50 days and alternating major and minor inspections every 200 days.684 To increase available airlift, the Command froze the calendar on sched­uled maintenance at the beginning of Desert Shield and then reinstated the inspections in late September.685 The

Figure 67

35

MAC Maintenance Cycles




result of deferring maintenance, of course, was a bow-wave of de­layed repair work (from an average of 37 open dis­crepancies to an aver­age of 46 per C‑141 aircraft in the space of a month and a half).686 To catch up on maintenance, the Command re­quested recall of 890 reserv­ists.687 It asked for only portions of the C‑5/C‑141 maintenance cadres assigned to the Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard, since mobiliz­ing all the maintenance personnel would have produced more manpower than need­ed.688 The C‑5/C‑141 maintenance personnel called up helped augment increased airlift oper­ations at Charleston, McGuire, Dover, and Westover Air Force Bases. During the second airlift surge in December and Janu­ary, scheduled maintenance was deferred again.
Table 34

C-5 Repairable Asset Flow Times689






Figure 67 reference


Description


Average time (days)


Comment



E

Retrograde forward site to SBSS

8.6







C

Intermediate turn time (repaired)

5.3

(Do­ver)



65% of units were repaired




D

Intermediate turn time (NRTS)

5.0

45% of units were NRTS




B

Retrograde from main base to ALC

21.1










ALC turn time

no data







A

Order and ship time from ALC to main operating base

19.1







F

Order and ship time from main operating base to forward base

18.4





Table 35

C-141 Repairable Asset Flow Times




Figure 67

refer­ence

Description

Average time (days)


Comment




E

Retrograde forward site to SBSS

12.6







C

Intermediate turn time (repaired)

6.9


42% of units were repaired




D

Intermediate turn time (not repairable)

4.7

58% of units were NRTS




B

Retrograde from main base to ALC

15.3










ALC turn time

no data

see footnote on C‑5 table




A

Order and ship time from ALC to main operating base

21.1







F

Order and ship time from main operating base to forward base

22.2





Download 5.55 Mb.

Share with your friends:
1   ...   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   ...   61




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page