Clinton Email Probe Means Political Tightrope for House GOP (National Journal)
By Ben Geman
March 24, 2015
National Journal
House Republicans probing the Benghazi attacks have a politically delicate task that goes well beyond investigating the 2012 incident that claimed the lives of four Americans. They have to make clear they’re out to get Hillary Clinton’s emails—not Hillary Clinton.
Thus far, Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy and his aides have taken pains to cast the overall Benghazi probe as a methodical one. It’s even taken some criticism from the Right for not being more aggressive against the former secretary of State.
And that’s by design. The panel wants to avoid the appearance that it is attacking Clinton by any means possible. That—ideally—means few leaks and little grandstanding.
“We are not putting out for the public bits and pieces of our investigation. That’s not how a solid, fair investigation is conducted,” said Rep. Susan Brooks of Indiana, one of seven Republicans on the panel. “I am very pleased with the professional nature and the civility of the investigation and how it is progressing.”
“If you look back at the three hearings we have had so far, I have mentioned Hillary Clinton’s name a whopping zero times. We were interviewing witnesses that have nothing to do with Secretary Clinton when this story broke,” Gowdy said on Fox News Sunday.
The emphasis on perception is a marked change from some previous House GOP investigations of the Obama administration, including probes into Fast and Furious and Solyndra, which were seen in some circles as political fishing expeditions. Many Republicans took note when House Speaker John Boehner announced last May that the Benghazi panel would be headed by Gowdy, not then-House Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa—the author of those more controversial probes.
“They have to be careful not to make it look too nakedly partisan, and more specifically, not exclusively built around the prospects of Hillary Clinton winning the White House in 2016, even though everyone in this town knows that that’s true,” said Thomas Schaller, a political science professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
To that point, last week Gowdy sent a letter to Clinton’s attorney asking for her private email server to be turned over to the State Department’s inspector general or another “neutral, detached, and independent arbiter.” Gowdy didn’t, however, ask for it to be sent over to the House panel.
Schaller’s recent book, The Stronghold: How Republicans Captured Congress but Surrendered the White House, argues that the increasingly powerful House wing of the GOP has hobbled the party’s White House prospects in recent decades. But in this case, Schaller believes the House panel is poised to help the party’s 2016 prospects.
“This might be the one case where, if it is done right and it is done successfully, I suppose it could actually help the presidential wing of the party because it does look like Hillary Clinton was damaged by this revelation,” he said of the discoveries about Clinton’s email practices.
GOP strategist Rick Wilson framed it this way in Politico: “Let’s try something new: maintain message discipline, hold focus and keep an eye on a bigger objective than your daily press release, social media hits or email fundraising drops.”
David Marin, a former top GOP aide on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and a veteran of congressional investigations, says the Select Committee has proceeded with integrity.
“I think they have proceeded exactly as I would have wanted to proceed if I were working for this committee. They are quietly, diligently doing their work. You haven’t seen leaks from this committee in terms of documents, you haven’t see any show hearings,” Marin said.
“I think at the end of the day, this committee will be judged on the quality of its report, on the report’s objectivity and utility, on whether the facts presented match the conclusions the committee reaches. Everything else is just theater and noise, and I do have a strong sense that Mr. Gowdy understands this,” said Marin, who is now with the Podesta Group, a prominent lobbying and PR firm.
Democrats are having none of it.
Rep. Adam Schiff, a Democratic panel member, said on Fox News Sunday recently that the GOP-controlled committee has not yet had Clinton testify on Benghazi because Republicans want that to occur “as far into the presidential cycle as possible.”
And GOP efforts to keep a lid on political talk or appearances may not make a difference anyway, given the personalities and strong feelings involved.
“It doesn’t matter what we do,” said committee member Lynn Westmoreland, a Georgia Republican. “It is going to be looked at as being political.”
Report criticizes official who helped Dems with visa program (Associated Press Newswires)
By Alicia A. Caldwell
March 25, 2015
Associated Press Newswires
WASHINGTON (AP) — When influential Democrats with stakes in different investment groups needed help securing visas as part of a complicated foreign investor program, they sought out a fellow Democrat who just happened to be in charge of the immigration agency overseeing their applications.
Homeland Security Deputy Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services at the time, took up their causes, according to a report by the Homeland Security Department’s inspector general. Investigators say Mayorkas improperly intervened in three cases involving prominent Democrats, including a company run by the youngest brother of likely Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.
In the report released Tuesday, investigators said Mayorkas helped efforts to secure the visas in ways that created the appearance of favoritism and special access. That, in turn, caused resentment among career government employees, managers and lawyers.
The agency’s inspector general, John Roth, said he could not suggest a motive for Mayorkas, a longtime Democrat who served on President Barack Obama’s transition team after his 2008 election and was U.S. attorney in California under President Bill Clinton. Roth did not accuse Mayorkas of violating any laws and acknowledged that Mayorkas sometimes declined to become involved in cases because he said he did not think it would be appropriate.
Mayorkas said in a statement that he disagreed with the inspector general’s findings but that “I will certainly learn from it and from this process.”
He added: “There was erroneous decision-making and insufficient security vetting of cases. I could not and did not turn my back on my responsibility to address those grave problems. I made improving the program a priority and I did so in a hands-on manner.”
The U.S. government’s investor-visa program, known as EB-5, allows foreigners to obtain visas to live permanently in the U.S. with their spouse and children if they invest $500,000 to $1 million in projects or businesses that create jobs for American citizens. Approved investors can become legal permanent residents after two years and later can become U.S. citizens.
The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said the findings were “extremely concerning” and that he will conduct a congressional hearing about them Thursday. Roth was expected to testify.
The Associated Press first reported in July 2013 — as Mayorkas was being considered for the No. 2 job at the Homeland Security Department — allegations that he had improperly intervened in the investor case involving a financing company run by Anthony Rodham, brother of Mrs. Clinton. Mayorkas told senators at his confirmation hearing that the allegations were “unequivocally false” and said he oversaw the program “based on the law and the facts, and nothing else.”
The inspector general’s new conclusions also cast doubt on whether the Homeland Security Department withheld embarrassing internal files the AP had sought under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act as part of its own investigation nearly two years ago — and instead released records that indicated no wrongdoing.
The AP in July 2013 requested all emails to or from Mayorkas over the preceding seven months that contained specific words or names, including Rodham. The government eventually sent AP more than 200 pages, mostly censored, including emails in which Mayorkas told investors and agency staff that he would not become involved in internal deliberations.
“I cannot weigh in,” Mayorkas wrote to Assistant Secretary Douglas Smith on Feb. 1, 2013, in a message turned over to the AP and cited in the new inspector general’s report. “The (investor’s) attorney sent an email to me and I responded that I could not weigh in.”
But the inspector general’s report also cited other messages from Mayorkas that were never turned over to AP. In one case, Mayorkas forwarded a January 2013 email from Rodham about delays with a high importance designation. The email would have been covered under AP’s information request since Mayorkas sent it during the relevant time period and contained Rodham’s name.
“Staff understood these applications were getting high-level attention,” the inspector general’s report said.
Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe was also connected to the investor proposal but later divested. His spokesman, Brian Coy, said the report demonstrated that McAuliffe asked the government to decide on the investment proposal in a timely fashion.
The other two cases involved a Hollywood investment program and an investment effort in Nevada that had ties to former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell and Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, respectively.
Mayorkas previously came under criticism for his involvement in the commutation by President Clinton of the prison sentence of the son of a Democratic Party donor. Another of Mrs. Clinton’s brothers, Hugh Rodham, had been hired by the donor to lobby for the commutation. Mayorkas told lawmakers during his 2009 confirmation hearing that it was a mistake to talk to the White House about the request.
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said there were lessons to be learned in the inspector general’s investigation but described Mayorkas in a statement as “exceptionally conscientious, honest and patriotic.”
“He is often impatient with our sluggish government bureaucracy, can at times be very hands-on in resolving issues and problems that are brought to his personal attention, and is always mindful that we are public servants,” Johnson said. “Ali works hard to do the right thing, and never acts, in my observation, for reasons of personal advancement or aggrandizement.”
Roth, the inspector general, praised as “courageous” the agency employees who confidentially had complained about Mayorkas’ actions and promised they would be protected as whistleblowers.
Share with your friends: |