Many factors have contributed to the success and competitiveness of Shenzhen. First, the Central Government has provided a special policy framework for the SEZ that has helped to create a “soft enabling environment” to enhance the city's industrial competitiveness. As a SEZ, Shenzhen has enjoyed by far the most liberal economic policies in the PRC, both in terms of attracting FDI and engaging in international trade. Shenzhen has been a testing ground for comprehensive reforms. For example, it was one of the first cities to apply differential corporate tax rates for foreign and domestic firms. While foreign investors paid a nominal tax burden of 15% and an actual tax burden of 11%, the corresponding figures for domestic investors were 33% and 23% respectively. The tax burden of domestic enterprises was twice that of foreign investors' enterprises. As a result of an open and liberal policy, the actual utilization of FDI increased by 10% annually from 1980 to 2006, the value of exports reached $136.1 billion in 2006, while imports reached $101.7 billion.
Second, Shenzhen has been home to migrants from across the country and, more recently, from overseas. The innovative spirit of the city stems in part from its vibrant and strongly motivated migrant community, which account for 83% of the total population. Third, Shenzhen's enabling financial environment ensures that finance is available even for relatively risky ventures. This has been important for the city's industrial transformation, increasing its competitiveness. Indeed, Shenzhen is the PRC's most active city as far as the availability of venture capital is concerned. By the end of 2005, the number of venture capital firms in Shenzhen accounted for one third of the total number in the whole country. The city also houses the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, the Shenzhen Small and Medium Sized Enterprise Guarantee Centre, and other critical financial architecture.
Fourth, there is well established infrastructure in Shenzhen. Shenzhen's harbour ranks fourth in the global container transportation business, and Shenzhen's airport ranks third in PRC, with 18.4 million passengers in 2006. The supply and quality of other infrastructure, such as roads, telecommunications, and utilities, also rank highly in the PRC. Fifth, Shenzhen enjoys the advantage of location. As a coastal city bordering Hong Kong, China, Shenzhen's bid to upgrade its industrial structure and competitiveness has benefited hugely from its proximity to Hong Kong, China as a major international financial, information, and services centre. A large share of investment to Shenzhen has come from Hong Kong.
Finally, the Shenzhen government is efficiently run, and apt to continuously reform and upgrade its administrative capacity. The government has provided “convenient services,” through direct one-stop services for large enterprises. Administrative transparency has improved over the years to strengthen the government's accountability. For instance, a development plan formulated by the Shenzhen government must be submitted to the People's Congress for approval. At the same time, local opinion is sought and encouraged to increase the transparency and effectiveness of the government decision making process. Business procedures in Shenzhen are simple and streamlined. The Shenzhen government has also implemented personal service responsibility to ensure that firms' applications for various categories of government approval are processed within a specified period of time.
One of the most important factors helping to facilitate Shenzhen's industrial transformation has been its ability to attract foreign investment. Output from foreign invested firms account for more than 40% of Shenzhen's GDP. FDI policies in the PRC, and especially in its SEZs, have become increasingly liberal These include: permission to set up wholly foreign-owned firms, enabling easier access to land and infrastructure, allowing the repatriation of profits, and favourable export and import polices.
Second, while FDI inflow was earlier concentrated in labour-intensive and small-scale operations, increasingly large TNCs from technology-intensive industries have begun to enter the PRC. To upgrade its industrial structure, the Shenzhen government has formulated a strategy to develop a “headquarter” economy by inviting multinational companies to move their headquarters into Shenzhen.
Third, industrial parks are an integral component of the Shenzhen SEZ. There are about 100 industrial parks located in the city, more than 90% of these located outside Shenzhen checkpoint , and about 70% based in villages and small towns. Shenzhen plans to integrate the existing parks and develop 52 larger parks.
Fourth, Shenzhen encourages the formation of industrial clusters or concentrations to benefit from economies of scale and scope. Various industrial clusters have been formed in the city, including clusters for the garments, bicycles, furniture, and semi-conductor industries.
Fifth, in the last 3 years, in order to upgrade its industrial competitiveness, the Shenzhen Municipal Government has proposed policies to develop a recycling economy, with the aim of improving the city's environment and saving resources. On 16 March 2006, Shenzhen passed its Recycling Economy Promotion Rules, enforcing more than 10 key procedures and systems to assess a firm's mid and long-term performance and planning, and to provide government procurement and policy support for developing industries that are environmentally-friendly and energy-efficient.
Sixth, in order to improve industrial competitiveness, the Shenzhen Government has decided to implement a new innovation strategy in early 2006. The aim is to structure Shenzhen as a “National Innovative City” in the PRC. Based on this decision, research and development investment will account for nearly 4% of the city's total GDP by 2010. The output value of high-tech products is expected to grow at an annual average rate of 20% over the next few years.
TYS Questions:
2007 H2 Q5 Either: Assess one or more of the strategies a country may adopt to try to ensure its continuing competitiveness in the global economy. [16m]
2007 H2 Q5 Or: With the help of one or more located examples, describe the nature of EPZs and outline why governments may develop them. [9m]
2008 H1 Q7 Or: With reference to one or more examples, critically examine the role of the state in economic development. [16m]
2008 H2 Q5 Or: Discuss the role of different governments in attracting FDI. [16m]
2009 H1 Q7 Either: Discuss the extent to which the state has contributed to the process of globalisation in the last 10 years. [16m]
Role of Supranational Bodies in Economic Development
Supranational bodies and intergovernmental organisations essentially play the role of a regulator in the economy, especially since it is a medium for the many members of the body. For example, they can regulate socio-economic policies or terms of trade between member countries. Normally, their aim is to benefit and satisfy the most people possible through their regulations, but it is almost impossible due to many countries having different aims during negotiations, as well as the real danger of powerhouses abusing their major stake to shift and alter policies to benefit themselves.
Also, in the case of regional blocs like ASEAN or EU, greater cooperation and trust between the bloc members can also result in increased trade, increased incomes and greater prosperity and economic stability. However, this may create a bias towards the member countries, in terms of trade as well as politics. Intra trade will be more profitable than external trade, which may lead to the possible marginalisation of smaller, lesser developed countries not in such unions. Overall, it might inhibit global trading, investment and competition by dividing the world economy into a few distinct blocs within which only the member countries benefit.
Supranational Bodies as a Regulator
Regulation of trade. Supranational bodies, as a coalition of various governments, can negotiate terms of trade with one another, often in pursuit of free trade by cooperating to reduce trade barriers. Often, Free Trade Agreements will be negotiated between countries or blocs of countries, such as the CAFTA or NAFTA. They also negotiate for the advantage of the world economy, including assisting developing countries. For example, the WTO removed tariffs on goods flows worth 142 billion to developing countries, exceeding the 80 billion contributed by major industrialised countries in 2005 in terms of aid. Also, the Uruguay Round of trade talks reduced agricultural subsidies from the more developed nations by 20%, benefiting the poorer farmers in LDCs who cannot compete.
Regulation of political stability. Key to the idea of economic development is social and political stability, since investments generally prefer countries with upright, more transparent, more effective governments and no major social upheavals, to ensure stable economies and stable investments. For example, ASEAN regulates and resolves political differences among countries, including territorial disputes and the prospect of nuclear proliferation. It contributed a role in the UN Transitional Administration in East Timor.
While it is much easier for countries to cooperate on economic issues due to relatively more common goals, it is much harder to do so when it comes to politics, as a result of widely differing viewpoints.
ASEAN
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations, commonly abbreviated ASEAN, is a geo-political and economic organization of ten countries located in Southeast Asia, which was formed on 8 August 1967 by Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand (the old members, ASEAN-6). Since then, membership has expanded to include Brunei, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam (the new members). Its aims include the acceleration of economic growth, social progress, cultural development among its members, the protection of the peace and stability of the region, and to provide opportunities for member countries to discuss differences peacefully.
Fundamental principles adopted by ASEAN:
-
mutual respect for the independence, sovereignty, equality, territorial integrity, and national identity of all nations;
-
the right of every State to lead its national existence free from external interference, subversion or coercion;
-
non-interference in the internal affairs of one another;
-
settlement of differences or disputes by peaceful manner;
-
renunciation of the threat or use of force; and
-
effective cooperation among themselves
Since the late 1990s, many scholars have argued that the principle of non-interference has blunted ASEAN efforts in handling the problem of Myanmar, human rights abuses and haze pollution in the region. Meanwhile, with the consensus-based approach, every member in fact has a veto and decisions are usually reduced to the lowest common denominator. There has been a widespread belief that ASEAN members should have a less rigid view on these two cardinal principles when they wish to be seen as a cohesive and relevant community.
ASEAN – Promoting Intra-ASEAN Trade and Economic Development
Large market size. The ASEAN population is 468.9 million for the ASEAN-10. This increased market size will increase intra-ASEAN trade. Average income in the new member countries is still low but GDP growth rates are satisfactory, therefore the prospect of trade creation taking advantage of market size is quite good.
Different comparative advantages between disparate economies. Another factor that will stimulate intra-ASEAN trade is resource diversification. The structure of the economies of the ASEAN-6 is quite similar and the scope of exchange is limited. The new members are different from the ASEAN-6 in regard to factor endowments and patterns of production. These new members are rich in natural resources, with low-wage labour forces, while the old members have higher-skilled labour and more capital. Classical trade theory suggests that trade between two countries stems from the differences in comparative advantage, which are determined by factor endowments. For example, countries with abundant natural resources will export resource-intensive products and countries that are relatively capital abundant will export capital-intensive goods. Economic integration has stronger trade creation effects when resource endowments are more diversified among members because the pattern of production is complementary among them. New members have comparative advantages in agriculture and raw materials; while old members have comparative advantages in manufactured goods. Therefore, integration widens the scope of exchange and increases intra-ASEAN trade.
Tariff reduction. AFTA, which entails the elimination of tariff and non-tariff barriers, was launched in 1993, and the main mechanism of AFTA is the CEPT scheme. Unlike the EU, AFTA does not apply a common external tariff on imported goods. Each ASEAN member may impose tariffs on goods entering from outside ASEAN based on its national schedules. However, for goods originating within ASEAN, ASEAN members are to apply a tariff rate of 0 to 5 percent (the more recent members of Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Vietnam, also known as CMLV countries, were given additional time to implement the reduced tariff rates). This is known as the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) scheme. Also, the CAFTA has slashed tariffs on 90% of traded goods.
Increased investment and tourism. The principal objective of AFTA is not intra-regional trade, rather, the objective is to make ASEAN an attractive investment area. The newer members of ASEAN present new opportunities for investment and tourism with a larger market, diversification of natural resources, labour abundance, low cost of living, and numerous tourist attractions. Investment in these countries will induce trade through imports of materials and machinery and exports finished products. Infrastructure development, which requires large investments, and is needed in the new member countries, also creates demand for imports of raw materials. For example, investment in construction in Lao PDR increases exports of cement and petroleum from Thailand. Tourism creates trade in services and demand for local souvenirs that can be developed into exports.
Liberalisation and restructuring of new members. All new members have restructured their economies from socialism to capitalism. AFTA forces the new members to adjust trade practices to international standards. AFTA makes tariffs uniform in term of rates and classifications. Non-tariff barriers have to be reduced and conformed to international regulations. The AFTA agreement also includes cooperation on a customs area which includes activities such as the formulation of a uniform ASEAN tariff list, building a green corridor for commodities participating in CEPT, and coordination of customs forms and procedures. The reduction of tariffs will encourage competition from imports. New members will have to make adjustments in production according to comparative advantage with less protection. The external forces of freer trade will make the economy more efficient and make exports more competitive, reinforcing the need to deregulate domestic production.
Greater integration of economies. For the CAFTA, Beijing launched a US$10 billion infrastructure investment fund to improve roads, railways and strengthen telecommunications links between China and ASEAN. ASEAN countries can also latch on to China’s production network and increase linkages with other economies.
Potential Economic Disadvantages of ASEAN
Forced economic restructuring. New member countries are concerned that tariff reductions will decrease tariff revenue. The countries in Indochina still rely on tariff revenue. In Lao PDR, the percentage of tariff revenue in total government revenue was 20.1 percent in 1995. The corresponding shares were 28.3 percent in Vietnam and 54.1 percent in Cambodia. Due to this concern, policymakers may delay tariff reductions, which will undermine regional trade creation. The current account deficits in these countries make some people worry that tariff reduction will stimulate imports and worsen the trade deficit. Recently, Vietnam increased tariff rates on cars, motorcycles and consumer goods to slow down imports and improve the trade deficit.
Economic dominance by the stronger member states. A recent survey showed that 57.3 percent of respondents believe the China-ASEAN free trade agreement (CAFTA) will disadvantage locals because local products cannot compete with Chinese products. A lowering of trade barriers means that the ones who can produce at a cheaper rate will benefit more, and generally these are the countries who have already attained greater economies of scale. In this case of the CAFTA, some local textile and food industries in Jakarta were flooded with cheaper imports from China. Also, freer flow of labour will mean that some countries will lose jobs due to competition within the trading bloc itself.
TYS Questions:
2007 H2 Q5 Or: Evaluate the role of supranational bodies in the economy of either a country or a regional grouping of countries. [16m]
2010 H1 Q7 Either: Evaluate the impact of supranational bodies (trading blocs and international institutions) on one national economy you have studied. [16m]
2010 H2 Q5 Or: Outline the ways in which membership of a regional bloc or regional grouping affects a national economy. Support your answer with one or more examples. [9m]
Share with your friends: |