Demand is increasing, old sources insufficient
Ebinger 12
Senior fellow and Director of the Energy Security Initiative at Brookings, Charles, “Liquid Markets: Assessing the Case for US Exports of Liquefied Natural Gas,” 5-2-12, http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/events/2012/5/02%20lng%20exports/20120502_lng_exports
While about 45 percent of the Pacific Basin’s total gas demand is met by LNG imports from within the region, an additional 40 percent of its demand is met by LNG imports from outside the region, primarily from the Middle East and Russia.59 Qa- tar alone accounted for 11 percent of Japanese LNG imports in 2010. Qatari production pre- dominantly serves both the European (mostly the U.K.) gas market and the Pacific Basin gas market. Current uncontracted supply available on the spot market is likely to be sent to Asia to take advan- tage of the Pacific Basin’s higher prices. However, other than meeting the existing spare capacity for LNG production, the Middle East will have little excess supply capacity. This is in part because Qa- tar is trying to preserve its price structure with the East Asian market and partly because there is a moratorium on further development of Qa- tar’s North Field, which together with Iran’s South Pars Field, is the largest gas field in the world. An- other reason for the limited excess supply from the Middle East is that Oman, which is the sec- ond largest Middle Eastern LNG exporter to Asia, is experiencing declining LNG exports as more gas is being consumed domestically. Iran, which has the world’s second largest gas reserves, has proposed several LNG projects, but has been un- able to implement them because of sanctions. Gas demand in Asia remains strong, led by Ja- pan, South Korea, and Taiwan, which accounted for more than half of all global LNG imports in 2010.60 Japan, the world’s largest importer of LNG, has seen a particular increase in projected natural gas demand as a result of the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power plant following the earthquake in March 2011. The nuclear accident, which has caused a short-term shutdown of most of Japan’s nuclear reactors, has also prompted a review of Japan’s nuclear energy policy. The re- view comes largely at the demand of the public, which is wary of Japan’s reliance on atomic pow- er.61 In the event of a move away from nuclear power, a significant amount of Japan’s electricity production will likely be met by additional LNG shipments. It is estimated that in 2012, Japan will require an additional 974 bcf of LNG to make up for the electricity shortfall resulting from the Fu- kushima accident and the reduction in nuclear power generation.62
Canada is no longer projected to be an LNG trade partner with Asia
Rubin 2014
(“Will Asian gas deal quash Canada’s LNG export hopes?”,JEFF RUBIN: 20 year journalism veteran, associate vice president of communications for Hillel ,May. 26 2014, 5:45 AM ED, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/will-asian-gas-deal-quash-canadas-lng-export-hopes/article18842432/)
A massive natural gas agreement between Asian superpowers may have just pulled the proverbial rug out from under Canada’s hopes to become a major exporter of Liquefied Natural Gas. The deal underscores one of the risks of playing in the global energy game–the goal posts can suddenly move just when you’re ready to kick the ball.¶ In the LNG business, global trade flows are driven by prices or, more precisely, price differentials between where natural gas is produced and where it’s sold. British Columbia’s plans to become a big natural gas exporter hinge on the wide disparity between Asian and North American prices. In Asia at the moment, natural gas is selling for upwards of $15 per thousand cubic feet. On this side of the Pacific the cost is around $4.50 per mcf. Getting that gas from here to there is tricky, but it’s easy to see how much money there is to be made if you can pull it off.¶ Of course, the rest of the energy world isn’t exactly going to sit still while you get your plans together. Last decade, Quebec City found that out first hand when its plans to import LNG from Russia through a regasification terminal were scuttled after North American natural gas prices crashed. The emergence of shale gas drilling and the ensuing spike in production made those hopes obsolete. The same thing is about to happen to British Columbia’s ambitions to become a major player in the global LNG business. China, for one, has now found a much cheaper source of supply that’s right in its own backyard.¶ There’s no small irony to the fact that by exhorting their European allies to wean themselves off their dependence on Russian gas, President Barrack Obama and Prime Minister Stephen Harper may have quashed their domestic hopes of exporting LNG to China. In an unintended consequence of the turmoil in Ukraine, the resurgence of Cold War tensions has acted as a catalyst to cement one of the world’s largest-ever energy deals between Russia and China.¶ Russia’s reliance on western European markets is as strategically problematic for it as it is or for its customers. If a dispute compels Russia to turn off the gas the lights may go out in Kiev and Berlin, but it also means cash flows start to dry up in Moscow. Right now, Russia’s state run gas company, OAO Gazprom, counts on European countries for about 80 per cent of its revenue. Reorienting its sales eastward is a natural hedge against any future conflict with western Europe that can imperil those vital cash flows. It’s also a natural fit. The world’s largest energy producer sits right next door to its biggest energy consuming economy.¶ The new $400-billion accord between Russia and China will also serve as a springboard for OAO Gazprom to develop its vast and largely untapped natural gas reserves in eastern Siberia. Some 4,000 kilometres of new pipeline will hook up Siberian gas wells to Beijing and other parts of northeastern China, a region that holds the same population as all of western Europe. As part of the deal, Russia will supply 3.7 billion cubic feet of gas per day to China for the next three decades. First gas is expected to flow as early as 2018.¶ Just as the supply of shale gas brought down North American gas prices, so too will the new supply of Russian gas lower prices in China. It’s thought that Gazprom will get just under $10 per mcf for its gas exports to China, which is $3 to $4 less than current Asian LNG spot prices. What’s more, China also has its own supplies of shale gas just waiting to be developed. The International Energy Agency estimates those reserves to be among the largest in the world. Tapping those supplies will bring prices down even further.
Share with your friends: |