Background & purpose of the system 1 basic institutions, processes, and players 3


Examination for Discovery (Oral Discovery)



Download 217.64 Kb.
Page34/63
Date03.04.2022
Size217.64 Kb.
#58539
1   ...   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   ...   63
Legal Process II (Farrow) - 2021 Winter
Examination for Discovery (Oral Discovery)


  • RCP r. 31.03(1): A party to an action may examine for discovery any other party adverse in interest, once, and may examine that party more than once only with leave of the court, but a party may examine more than one person as permitted by subrules (2) to (8).

  • Each side is entitled to discover a representative from a party adverse in interest, follows documents; typically plaintiff interviews defendant and vice versa but can be any party adverse in interest (e.g. co-defendants)

    • 31.03 (2) Corporations: examining party can select any (or more than one) officer

    • Non-parties examinable only with leave, same as with documents

  • Format: party given “notice of examination”; typically oral, but can be written or done by video conference; typically in lawyer’s boardroom; court reporter is present, transcript created; under oath (RCP rr. 31, 34-36)

  • Typically seven hours, except on consent (Apotex) or with leave (RCP r. 31.05.1); e.g. for complicated multi- party cases

  • Strategy: implications for who you name as a party, but has to be in good faith; try to get material fact evidence

  • Objections: questions that are irrelevant or privileged (RCP r. 34.12); might undertake to get back to them (RCP r. 5.1-6) or “take the question under advisement” which imposes no duty to give a response to the question

  • Use at Trial: read in (admission) - either call witness and ask same questions or read the transcript under oath

into the court transcript; and impeachment (using prior inconsistent statements) to show a witness is lying/isn’t

credible (RCP r. 31.11)



    • Also potentially when person examined not available (limited circumstances, with leave) (RCP r. 31.11(6))

  • Important ethics/civility implications, particularly in sensitive trials


PRIVILEGE


  • Exception to spirit of production/disclosure, some types of relevant information are deemed privileged and do not need to be produced/disclosed

  • Two types of privileges at Canadian common law Lizotte:
1   ...   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   ...   63




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page