International organisation for standardisation organisation internationale de normalisation


Audio closing plenary discussions



Download 3.13 Mb.
Page36/51
Date19.10.2016
Size3.13 Mb.
#3850
1   ...   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   ...   51

4.6Audio closing plenary discussions


Several discussions that took place in Friday’s Audio closing plenary are noted under the appropriate headings elsewhere in this report. However there was discussion on “profile-dependent behaviour” that has no other place in this report, and so will be noted here. The Audio Chair brought up this as a general topic, but which was motivated by the fact that currently one signalling mode for HE-AAC profile specifies that a AAC profile decoder should not play a HE-AAC profile bitstream. This appears to be contrary to the long-standing WG11 policy of only specifying what a decoder shall do, but what it shall not do. In other words, a conformant decoder can always do more than what the specification mandates. David Singer, Apple, indicated that his company strongly supports the WG11 policy and does not support the current HE-AAC profile restrictions.

4.7WG11 closing plenary discussions


In the Audio Chair’s presentation during Friday’s MPEG closing plenary, three items prompted discussion from WG11 delegates and hence will be noted here.

First, the Convenor reminded the Audio chair that WG11 cannot be a forum to promote a program that is or appears to be a “for-profit.” Hence the UoM UMusic database document will be edited such that it promotes only those aspects of the database that are available free of charge.

Second, Audio Chair asked Stefan Kraegeloh, FhG, to present the Audio output document that was the result of the Joint with MDS, Req on Content Protection for MAF Music Player. This presentation resulted in considerable discussion amongst WG11 experts. Based on this discussion, the document approved by Audio was edited to incorporate various points of view such that all WG11 delegates were able to approve the resulting document.

Third, the Audio presentation raised an issue that requested comment from WG11 experts, that being whether MPEG profiles can “prohibit” a specified behaviour in a conformant decoder. This did result in many valuable comments from the floor, and the consensus was that a WG11 specification should not preclude a conformant decoder from doing “more” than the specification requires. Hence the current Audio specifications for HE-AAC Profile and HE-AAC V2 Profile may need revision. For details on HE-AAC Profile, Audio experts are encouraged to review

5570    Text of ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/FDAM 1, Bandwidth Extension , Clause 1.6.5    Signaling of SBR and Table 1.15A – SBR Signaling and Corresponding Decoder Behavior

And for HE-AAC V2 Profile

N7016    ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/FPDAM 4, Audio Lossless Coding (ALS), new audio profiles and BSAC extensions and 7134    Study on 14496-3:2001/FPDAM 4.

In either document, look at



Clause 1.6.6 Signaling of Parametric Stereo (PS) and Table 1.15A – PS Signaling and Corresponding Decoder Behavior

5Meeting deliverables

5.1Press statement


The Audio part of the press statement was prepared.

5.2Dispositions of Comments


The DoC were prepared and approved.

5.3Responses to Liaison and NB comments


Liaison initiated by Audio were prepared and approved. The responses to the NB comments were prepared and approved.

5.4Recommendations for final plenary


The Audio recommendations were presented and approved.

5.5Establishment of Ad-hoc Groups


The following ad-hoc groups were established by the Audio subgroup:

No.

Title

Mtg

N7158

AHG on Audio Standards Maintenance

No

N7159

AHG on MPEG-7 Audio

No

N7160

AHG on Spatial Audio Coding

Yes

N7161

AHG on MPEG-4 Lossless Audio Coding

No

N7162

AHG on Symbolic Music Representation

Yes

N7163

AHG on Exploration of Scalable Speech and Audio Coding

Yes

5.6Approval of output documents


All output documents, shown in Annex D, were presented in Audio plenary and were approved.

6Future activities

6.1Schedule of future meetings


Ad Hoc group meetings are indicated in Section 5.5. Unless otherwise indicated, Ad Hoc group meetings will be held at the location of the next MPEG meeting on the weekend preceding that meeting.

6.2Agenda for next meeting


The agenda for the next MPEG meeting is shown in Annex E

6.3All other business


There was none.

6.4Closing of the meeting


The 72nd Audio Subgroup meeting was adjourned Friday at 13:54. The Chair thanked the Audio experts for their hard work during the week, and urged them to enjoy their 6-minute lunch break.
  1. Participants





First

Last Name

Country

Affiliation

Inseon

Jang

KR

ETRI

James

Johnston

USA

Microsoft

Junghoe

Kim

KR

Samsung AIT

Minsoo

Kim

KR

Pixtree

Jens

Spille

DE

Thomson

Jonas




SE

Coding Technologies

Benjelloun

Abdellatib

FR

France Telecom R&D

Maurizio

Campanai

I

EXITECH

Kok Seng

Chong

SG

Panasonic Singapore

Benjamin

Dorn

US

MoodLogic

Bernhard

Feiten

DE

Deutsche Telekom

Ralf

Geiger

DE

Fraunhofer IIS

Bernhard

Grill

DE

Fraunhofer IIS

Matthias

Gruhne

DE

Fraunhofer IDMT

Jürgen

Herre

DE

Fraunhofer IIS

Kurt

Jacobson

USA

University of Miami

Sang-Wook

Kim

KR

Samsung

Kristofer

Kjörling

S

Coding Technologies

Tilman

Liebchen

DE

TU Berlin

Xiao

Lin

SG

I2R

Sua Hong

Neo

SG

Panasonic

Paolo

Nesi

I

UNIFI DSI

Toshiyuki

Nomura

JP

NEC

Hyen-O

Oh

KR

LG Electronics

Werner

Oomen

NL

Philips

Sunghee

Park

KR

Pixtree

Pierrick

Philippe

FR

France Telecom R&D

Heiko

Purnhagen

S

Coding Technologies

Schuyler

Quackenbush

USA

ARL

Andreas

Schneider

DE

Coding Technologies

Jeongil

Seo

KR

ETRI

Ralph

Sperschneider

DE

Fraunhofer IIS

Yoshiaki

Takagi

JP

Panasonic

Anisse

Taleb

SE

Ericsson AB

David

Virette

FR

France Telecom R&D

Giorgio

Zoia

CH

EPFL


  1. Download 3.13 Mb.

    Share with your friends:
1   ...   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   ...   51




The database is protected by copyright ©ininet.org 2024
send message

    Main page