36 preferred treatment in the standard notation. In some cases, options are also suggested to provide shorter notation for the aspect.
12.2 Options are provided throughout the Classification to emphasize jurisdiction, ethnic or national group,
language, topic, or other characteristic.
12.3 Options described in notes appear in parentheses and begin with Option. Options that apply to the full entry appear at the end of the entry options to a specific instruction in the entry follow the appropriate note. For example, the following option appears at the end of the entry for 420-490: Option B To give local emphasis and a shorter number to a specific language, place it first by use of a letter or other symbol, e.g., Arabic language A preceding 420], for which the base number is A. Option A is described under 410)
12.4 Some
optional numbers are enumerated in the schedules and tables and appear in parentheses in the number column. A special optional arrangement (222)-(224) for books of the Bible as arranged in Tanakh appears as a subsection of the Manual note for 221.
12.5
Arrange notes are also options. They represent suggestions only the material need not be arranged as specified. An example of an arrange note is found at 796.48 Olympic games Option Arrange specific games chronologically
12.6 Some national libraries and central cataloging authorities assign a few optional numbers, e.g., Library and Archives Canada uses C for Canadian literature in English and C for Canadian literature in French.
12.7 If organization by Indigenous people is preferred over organization by subject, a local- option notation could be formulated by appending Dewey notation for the subject to an alphabetic code representing an Indigenous people. Given the close relationship
between peoples and languages, possible sources for the alphabetic code are the ISO 639 Language Codes (parts 1-3 can be searched at https://iso639-
3.sil.org/code_tables/639/read
). For example, under such an option, Yupik education could be represented as YPK370.
12.8 Most of the time, the responsibility for implementing an option rests with the local library. Libraries should weigh the value of using an option against the loss in interoperability of numbers. The library will not be able to use numbers
assigned by other libraries, and other libraries will not be able to use the optional numbers assigned by the library. In addition, unless the option is widely used in a region, users maybe confused by the alternate notation.