Teacher Quality
Increase capacity of all staff to engage in a continuum of learning. Enhance leadership of all staff to implement the school continuous improvement plan.
Outcomes from 2012–2014
-
To increase to 100% of staff developing an individual Professional Learning plan
-
To increase to 100% of staff implementing the QTL framework in all teaching and learning programs (Years 7-12)
Evidence of progress towards outcomes in 2013:
-
Significant increase in number of staff developing an individual Professional Learning plan
-
Significant increase in number of staff implementing the QTL framework in all teaching and learning programs (Years 7-12)
Strategies to achieve these outcomes in 2014:
-
Implementation of School Evaluation process – two faculties per year – to identify areas in teaching and learning that improves differentiated quality teaching
-
External and school data used to identify Teacher Professional Learning needs
-
Teacher Professional Learning for all staff in using and analysing SMART data
-
Review current TARS and EARS process
Professional learning
All teachers and Administrative staff have the opportunity for professional learning. Professional Learning is linked with our School Development targets for each year are concentrated in immersing staff with the data, information and professional development to realise our school targets.
The Staff is given the opportunity for personal development in professional learning opportunities in programs covering Literacy, Numeracy, Technology, Student Engagement and Management, new syllabus implementation and Beginning Teachers.
All teaching staff participated in professional learning activities through the five school development days and in activities organised during staff and other meetings throughout the year. In addition teachers participated in individual activities for their own development and to report back to faculty and whole staff forums. This included curriculum areas of all KLAs and Technology in classroom practice.
Head Teachers also undertook a variety of professional learning courses in preparation for the National Curriculum and the school teams, who meet twice per term, focused on applying strategies to work towards meeting our school targets.
Parent/caregiver, student, and teacher satisfaction
In 2013 the school sought the opinions of parents, students and teachers about the school.
Students feel that what they learn is important and worthwhile and that they are acquiring skills that will help them in life. In particular, they feel that they can do well enough to be successful and achieve a high standard. More importantly, students believe that they have the opportunity to realise their career goals.
The Year 7 reviews completed at the end of first term showed a strong agreement that their son had settled in well, was enjoying her subjects and had made new friends. There were no negative responses to the school.
Year 12 students indicated that working towards the Higher School Certificate had been challenging and interesting and that their courses had developed their knowledge and understanding. A high percentage of students believe that school has taught them teamwork, communication, respect and responsibility and the skills necessary to make their goals a reality.
Information from all of the school self-evaluation tools suggests that within the school community there is a high level of appreciation for the value of learning and a strong commitment to the continued improvement of our student learning outcomes whilst enhancing the whole development of our young girls.
There is a consensus among staff and parents that we provide a holistic education so that in addition to academic pursuits, students are able to excel in the arts, in sport and be provided with a variety of social and cultural experiences.
Program evaluations
NSW public schools conduct evaluation to support the effective implementation of the school plan. In 2013 our school carried out evaluation of Cooks Learning Centre, student attendance and engagement.
Background
Our school welfare programs are the foundation of the school ethos which promotes a safe and happy learning environment where everyone achieves learning success. The school provides a supportive environment where students are heard and families are involved in the welfare and discipline needs of the students. The school has an organised welfare and discipline system where most cases are dealt with by teachers and the more difficult cases being referred to Head Teachers, Year Advisers and the Senior Executive
Cooks Learning Centre
Background
Our analysis of our system for student engagement identified that there were several students that required additional support to develop a positive attitude towards school and their education.
Cook’s Learning Centre (CLC) program was established in Term 2 of 2013 to provide an alternative education program for students who:
-
were disengaged from learning
-
exhibited challenging behaviours and
-
experienced low participation rates.
The program aimed to meet literacy and numeracy deficits by catering for individual needs; increase participation through project based activities and; build social development though lessons targeted at self-confidence and resilience. In 2013 the program supported up to 12 students ranging from Year 7 to Year 10. Students had the option to re-enter regular classes once they felt that the program had met their needs or had them reflect on what changes they would make in their approach to learning.
Findings and Conclusions
All students benefited in some way from the program. Some had been so resistant to learning in the core skill areas of literacy and numeracy that progress in this area was minimal, however, it was significantly more than they were achieving in their regular classes (based on initial observations of students in term 2). Others were more committed, building up a portfolio of work and also attempting assessment task from their regular classes.
The major practical task focused on a painting/graffiti project. Some students participated enthusiastically focusing on preparing and painting the walls and detailed areas of the classroom. Others were drawn to the graffiti aspect, creating the “Cook’s Crib” design as a way of identifying with the program, the notion of “crib” signifying a place of one’s own. This was an important step in attempting to re-engage previously alienated students into the school environment.
The concept of the CLC in 2013 has proved enormously beneficial, not only for the students who participated, but also for students in regular classes, avoiding disruption to learning from students now in the CLC. This has been acknowledged by staff across the whole school.
Future Directions
In November 2013, the regional Learning and Support Team were invited to assist in reviewing the CLC and to make recommendations for 2014. Recommendations for 2014 include:
-
Personalised Learning Plans
-
Case Management approach including parents
-
Formalised transition back to regular classes through case review process
-
Behaviour Management system which reflects the school’s (Cook’s Code) but makes accommodations for the students in CLC
These recommendations are in the process of being implemented for 2014.
This year has also seen the CLC enter into a landscape revitalisation around the school assisted project with Rockdale Bunnings, as a community partnership. Students are also benefiting from the addition of the “Rock and Water” program in order to focus on the need for self-discipline and self-management.
It is hoped that the CLC can continue at James Cook in 2014, in order to assist students with additional learning needs, as well as benefit the whole of the school community.
Student attendance and readiness to work in classes was also an area which was identified as needing evaluation.
Systems of student attendance and engagement
Background
The welfare team devised an initiative that was identified as “Operation Dragnet”. This whole school program specifically focused on reinforcing the ways in which students might responsibly manage their time, maintain habits of punctuality and consolidate consistent involvement in daily classes. It definitively promoted faster movement from the playground area to lessons, as well as the efficient movement of the boys between lessons. By so doing, this initiative contributed to the effectiveness of the students’ learning experiences in the classroom.
Findings and conclusions
This intensive operation garnered a number of benefits. In its first stages, the executive clearly established the parameters of the program ensuring that the students clearly appreciated the valuable correlation between being punctual to class and being ready to participate in educational activities. This was then affirmed by the positive, collaborative efforts of the rostered teachers, who moved around the school daily and monitored quality attendance. After one week, the findings indicated a very significant increase in punctuality as well as improved involvement in lessons. This outcome was sustained and resulted in both the school being more settled and students showing a steady willingness to engage in learning. The program also promoted personal awareness by prompting boys to exercise responsible choice and cooperation.
Future directions
The outcomes of Operation Dragnet have indicated that this initiative has the capacity to engender thoughtful social practices in students. To consolidate the norms of cooperation and learning engagement, the program will be further utilised and developed in 2014.
About this report
In preparing this report, the self-evaluation committee has gathered information from evaluations conducted during the year and analysed other information about the school's practices and student learning outcomes. The self-evaluation committee and school planning committee have determined targets for the school's future development.
Terry Vallis - Principal
Vicky Manos – Deputy Principal
Margaret Paraskevopoulos - P&C Pesident
Kamel El Chikrawe – School Captain
Tom Tomasi – School Captain
Steve Tsaridis – Head Teacher Welfare
Maree Rix- Head Teacher English
Robinson Mansour - Head Teacher Mathematics
Maria Atzemis - Head Teacher HSIE
Robert Barnes - Head Teacher TAS
Krishna Diwakar - Head Teacher Science (Rel)
Lesley Rae- Head Teacher Creative Arts
Alan Kentwell – Head Teacher PDHPE
Ben Yelavich – Sport Co-ordinator
Julie Blatchford – Careers Advisor
Fiona Sutton – Special Education Teacher
Sara Smith – National Partnerships Co-ordinator
Holly Cork – Peer Support Co-ordinator
Maxine Lee – International Student Co-ordinator
Judi Seggie- School Administration Officer
Matthew Edwards – English Teacher
School contact information
James Cook Boys Technology High School
Princes Highway
Kogarah NSW 2217
Ph: 02 9587 1770
Fax: 02 9553 8242
Email: jamescookb‐h.school@det.nsw.edu.au
Web: www.jamescookb‐h.schools.nsw.edu.au
School Code: 8882
Parents can find out more information about
Annual School Reports, how to interpret information in the reports and have the opportunity to provide feedback about these reports at:
http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/asr
Share with your friends: |