(ii) Timing of verification submissions for design
Where possible, design documentation should be divided into logical packages per SCE in consultation with the ICP and a schedule for submission/examination established. This will allow the most effective use of resources on behalf of the ICP and enable the progress of the scheme, with regard to the different SCEs, to be easily established.
It is particularly important that the ICP be given the opportunity to review and comment on the design early enough to be in a position to influence any changes necessary to ensure suitability.
(iii) Scope of procurement/fabrication verification
activities
As early as possible within the FEED and detailed design stages, a procurement register should be made available to the ICP and agreement reached as to those items which are to be subject to verification at source
(i.e. at a vendor’s works).
The extent of verification activities proposed will be agreed between the ICP and duty holder and should relate to the risk associated with failure of each of the items) concerned. Verification activities at vendors works or at major fabrication sites, should be documented by the issue of specific instructions to ICP surveyors complemented by a markup of the vendor/fabricator’s planned inspection and test schedules to indicate those points where intervention is required.
(iv) Scope of verification activities during HUIC
Prior to commencement of commissioning activities
(either onshore or offshore) the commissioning plans for
SCE systems should be made available for ICP review,
comment and markup, to indicate those activities subject to verification review and the extent of ICP
involvement. The nature and frequency of these activities should again, be related to the risk of failure of the SCE to perform and should be agreed between the
ICP and duty tolder.
Verification activities during commissioning should be supported by the issue of specific instructions to ICP
surveyors.
Share with your friends: |
