From the Destination Life Cycle to Carrying Capacity
The destination life cycle is a useful concept for the description of possible forms and consequences of tourism development. It focuses attention on some important mechanisms of tourism development. However, the destination life cycle should not be looked upon as an inevitable process. At any moment adaptations are possible, for example by government policies.
An important contribution of the life cycle concept is its focus on both temporal and physical concentration. The first is related to growth rates, the second to absolute numbers in relation to the destination’s resources. Both types of concentration can be analyzed in terms of carrying capacity.
Carrying Capacity
In the context of tourism, the concept of carrying capacity can be defined as the maximum number of people who can use a site without an unacceptable alteration in the human and natural environment and without an unacceptable decline in the quality of the experience gained by visitors (Mathieson and Wall, 1982).
The concept of carrying capacity is used mostly when assessing the environmental impacts of tourism. However, the concept is also applicable to other impacts such as socio-cultural and economic ones.
According to Muller (1994) five important dimensions of tourism development exist, together forming the “magic pentagon”.
For at least four of these dimensions one can imagine the existence of a carrying capacity.
-
economic health
-
well-being of locals
-
protection of resources
-
healthy culture
Assume respect for the economic, social, environmental and cultural carrying capacities respectively. Maybe satisfaction of guests can also be described in such terms: a “satisfactional” carrying capacity.
According to Muller sustainable tourism can only exist if none of the mentioned carrying capacities are violated. In practice, however, there appears to be a trade-off between the short term need for economic development and the long term sustainability interests.
Conclusions
Economic, environmental and socio-cultural impacts usually do not occur independently. Often, they can all be linked to a destination’s stage in tourism development. Crucial factors appear to be scale and rate of change, because these are intimately connected with foreign involvement and environmental and social carrying capacities.
In order to expose the inter-linkages between the different kinds of impact, the concepts of carrying capacity and destination life cycle offer interesting perspectives. However, empirical validation of the processes described in this chapter is crucial and will be an important element of future work.
Acknowledgement: Reproduced With permission from Drs. Bas Amelung, Global tourism towards an integrated approach, ICIS, 1995
List of Tables and Figures
Table 1
|
Push and Pull Factors Often Used
|
P. 88
|
Table 2
|
Tourist Types as Described by Nickerson and Ellis (1991)
|
P. 93
|
Table 3
|
Destination Preference by Tourist Type
|
P. 94
|
Table 4
|
Visitor Arrival Statistics
|
P. 107
|
Table 5
|
Visitor Profile
|
P. 108
|
Table 6
|
Places Visited
|
P. 108
|
Table 7
|
In-town Visitor per Capita Spending by Major Market Area
|
P. 109
|
Table 8
|
Overnight Visitor Spending Patterns
|
P. 109
|
Table 9
|
Main Items Bought
|
P. 110
|
Table 10
|
Purpose of Visit
|
P. 163
|
Table 11
|
Overnight Visitor Spending Patterns
|
P. 163
|
Table 12
|
Same-day In-town Visitor Spending Patterns
|
P. 164
|
Table 13
|
Top Ten Main Items Bought by Visitors
|
P. 164
|
Table 14
|
Top Ten Most Visited Places by Visitors
|
P. 165
|
Table 15
|
Top Five Performance Factors
|
P. 178
|
Table 16
|
Theme Parks Planning in Asia
|
P. 188
|
Table 17
|
The Effects of Tourism on Socio-cultural Aspects of Communities
|
P. 197
|
Table 18
|
Benefits and Costs of Tourism Development
|
P. 198
|
Table 19
|
Tourists who Seek for Local Culture vs Tourists who Look for Superficial Pleasure
|
P. 199
|
Table 20
|
Frequency of Types of Tourists and Their Adaptations to Local Norms
|
P. 200
|
Table 21
|
Host Attitudinal / Behavioural Responses to Tourist Activity
|
P. 202
|
Table 22
|
Doxey’s Index of Tourist Irritation
|
P. 209
|
Table 23
|
A Framework for the Study of Tourism and Environmental Stress
|
P. 245
|
Table 24
|
Green’s Checklist of the Environmental Impacts Caused by Tourism
|
P. 246
|
|
|
|
Figure 1
|
The Formation of Travel Motivations and Travel Actions
|
P. 73
|
Figure 2
|
Push and Pull Theory in One’s Travel Experience
|
P. 89
|
Figure 3
|
Pressures on Tourist Behaviour
|
P. 95
|
Figure 4
|
Tourism and the Structure of the Tourism Industry
|
P. 121
|
Figure 5
|
Connections between Tourists and Product Suppliers of Different Categories in the Tourism Industry
|
P. 122
|
Figure 6
|
Tourism Service Retail Channels Commonly Found in HK
|
P. 123
|
Figure 7
|
Community Problems Associated with the Development of Tourism
|
P. 201
|
Figure 8
|
Host Attitudinal / Behavioural Responses to Tourist Activities
|
P. 212
|
Figure 9
|
Levels of Cultural Penetration
|
P. 218
|
Figure 10
|
Economic Impacts of Tourism
|
P. 232
|
Figure 11
|
The Tourism Income Multiplier at Work
|
P. 233
|
Figure 12
|
The Multiplier Process
|
P. 233
|
Figure 13
|
How Leakages Happen?
|
P. 237
|
Figure 14
|
Environmental Impacts of Tourism
|
P. 253
|
Figure 15
|
The Destination Life Cycle
|
P. 257
|
Figure 16
|
Tourism Development’s Magic Pentagon
|
P. 261
|
Share with your friends: |