113to degrade them. Before any Soldier is ordered to appear or testify, the legal advisor should be consulted.
No witness not subject to the UCMJ can be required to make a statement or produce evidence that would violate the 5th Amendment to the US. Constitution. If a witness invokes
UCMJ Article 31 or the 5th Amendment, the IO must stop questioning and contact the legal advisor. The legal advisor should assist the IO in determining if the invocation is well taken. This may require sending the witness to see a legal assistance or Trial Defense Service attorney for advice. If the IO, in consultation
with the legal advisor, determines that the invocation is not well taken, the IO may order military and civilian employee witnesses to testify, or they may contact the witness’s supervisor for assistance.
Weingarten rights maybe necessary for bargaining unit member employees. If a civilian employee, who is a member of a certified bargaining unit represented
by a labor organization, reasonably believes that he or she might be disciplined as a result of an interview, and requests union representation, then the employee is entitled to have a union representative present during the interview.
If a bargaining unit member requests union representation, the IO should consult with the legal advisor. The IO’s options
are to grant the request, discontinue the interview, or offer the employee the choice between continuing the interview unaccompanied by a union representative and having no interview at all.
A confession or admission obtained by unlawful coercion or inducement likely to affect its truthfulness will not be accepted as evidence.
If members of the Armed Forces acting in their official capacity conductor direct a search that they know is unlawful, evidence obtained as a result of that search may not be accepted or considered by an IO or board. Such evidence is acceptable only if it can reasonably be determined by the legal advisor or, if none, by the IO or president that the evidence would inevitably have been discovered.
In all other cases, evidence obtained as a result of any search or inspection maybe accepted, even if it has been or would be ruled inadmissible in a criminal proceeding. This exclusionary provision is applicable only when a respondent is involved, in other words, during a formal investigation.
Share with your friends: